Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Portable Toilet Rental and Related Services
- Solicitation number
- FA4418-20-Q-0030
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Appendix A - Portable Toilet Locations.docx | DOCX document | |
| COMBO - Portable Toilets.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Pricing sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - Wage Determination 2015-4427.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - PWS Portable Toilets.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
JOINT BASE CHARLESTON PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL and SERVICE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Portable Toilet Rental and Service contract at Joint Base Charleston, SC.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Roger “Dale” Crews at (843) 963-3568 or roger.crews@us.af.mil .
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Telephone Number:
Address:
Fax Number: Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Address:
Telephone Number:
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Email:
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced supervisors and/or employees with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, (if necessary), qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving problems. |
| 6. |
| Provided/followed effective quality control plan and inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 13. |
| Met established project/delivery/service schedules. |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution to service calls. |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 17. |
| Provided equipment in a timely manner (as requested) as work-in-progress increased. |
| 18. |
| Provided accurate and complete proposals including requests for special events (additional equipment) and work-in-progress increases. |
| 19. |
| Cooperated with Government/Corporation/Company personnel after contract award. |
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract? |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .