Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionaire_(PPQ)_0001.docx

Attachment 6 – Past Performance Questionnaire

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Offeror:___________________________________________________________________

B. Agency/Customer:___________________________________________________________

C. Contract Title:______________________________________________________________

D. Contract number: ____________________________________________________________

E. Contract type: _______________________________________________________________

F. Award Date: ________________________________________________________________

G. Completion Date: ____________________________________________________________

H. Contract Value:

Initial: _____________________________________________

Final: ______________________________________________

I. Period of performance: _______________________________________________________

J. Offeror Role (Prime or Sub): __________________________________________________

K. Government Point of Contact:

L. Project Description

SECTION 2: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

Effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.

Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program

Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

Government Contracts Only: has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 3: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this form to the contractor that has submitted for evaluation, they will provide with their proposal submission.

If uncomfortable with providing directly to the contractor, please submit a copy to:

Stephanie McCullough, stephanie_mccullough@ibc.doi.gov

And

Stephanie Gibbs, stephanie_gibbs@ibc.doi.gov