Attachment 4 - Past Performance Information Sheet.pdf
PDF 302 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6817126QT016
About this file
This is a Past Performance Information Sheet template for a federal contract solicitation related to maritime tug boat services. The form requires quoters to submit up to three past performance references documenting relevant contract experience.
Each reference section requires quoters to provide contract identification information (contract number, value, period of performance), procurement agency details, and a reference point of contact with phone and email. For each reference, quoters must describe the work performed with specific metrics including total annual ship movements supported and average number of tug boats used per ship movement. The form requires detailed disclosure of any performance issues encountered, including the number, type, frequency, and duration of issues along with their impact on quality, delivery, and cost. Quoters must also describe corrective actions taken and their outcomes. Finally, quoters must self-assess the relevance of each past performance reference using four defined categories: Very Relevant (essentially same scope, magnitude, and complexity), Relevant (similar scope, magnitude, and complexity), Somewhat Relevant (some alignment with scope, magnitude, and complexity), or Not Relevant (little or no alignment). The definitions clarify that relevance is evaluated based on scope (range of operations), magnitude (dollar value), and complexity (degree of difficulty) compared to the current solicitation requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ_N6817126QT016.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - ELIN Pricing Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 - Tugboat Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4 – PAST PERFOR MANCE INFORMATION SHEET
Reference #1
Contract Value:
Period of Performance:
Contract Number:
Procurement Agency or Organization:
Reference Point of Contact Name:
Phone Number:
Email:
1. Detailed description of the work performed under the contract. Include the total number of ship movements supported per year and the average number of tug boats used per ship movement:
2. Describe any issues during the contract performance (including the number, type, frequency, duration of issues and impact on quality, delivery or cost in performing the contract):
3. Describe any corrective actions taken and the outcome of those actions:
4. Does the Quoter consider their past performance to be very relevant, relevant, somewhat relevant or not relevant? (See definitions on pg.4). Please discuss why:
Type of Contract and identify if Prime or Subcontractor:
Reference #2
Contract Value:
Period of Performance:
Contract Number:
Procurement Agency or Organization:
Reference Point of Contact Name:
Phone Number:
Email:
1. Detailed description of the work performed under the contract. Include the total number of ship movements supported per year and the average number of tug boats used per ship movement:
2. Describe any issues during the contract performance (including the number, type, frequency, duration of issues and impact on quality, delivery or cost in performing the contract):
3. Describe any corrective actions taken and the outcome of those actions:
4. Does the Quoter consider their past performance to be very relevant, relevant, somewhat relevant or not relevant? (See definitions on pg.4). Please discuss why:
Type of Contract and
Reference #3
Contract Value:
Period of Performance:
Contract Number:
Procurement Agency or Organization:
Reference Point of Contact Name:
Phone Number:
Email:
1. Detailed description of the work performed under the contract. Include the total number of ship movements supported per year and the average number of tug boats used per ship movement:
2. Describe any issues during the contract performance (including the number, type, frequency, duration of issues and impact on quality, delivery or cost in performing the contract):
3. Describe any corrective actions taken and the outcome of those actions:
4. Does the Quoter consider their past performance to be very relevant, relevant, somewhat relevant or not relevant? (See definitions on pg.4). Please discuss why:
Type of Contract and
The definitions for “Relevant”, ”Not Relevant” “scope”, “size” and “complexity” are as follows:
• Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
• Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
• Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
• Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Scope: Range of operations covered.
Magnitude: Dollar value.
Complexity: Degree of difficulty.
| Reference #1 |
| Reference #2 |
| Reference #3 |
| Contract Number: |
| Contract Value: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Reference Point of Contact: |
| Procuring Agency or Organization: |
| Describe any issues during the contract performance: |
| Describe any corrective actions taken: |
| Type of Contract: |
| Detailed description of the services performed under the contract: |
| Past performance relevancy: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .