Attachment 4 - Past Performance.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP #6923G226R000002 USMMA FOOD SERVICES
- Solicitation number
- 6923G226R000002
About this file
This is a Past Performance evaluation form designed to assess contractor qualifications for the USMMA Food Services contract. The document functions as a template that requires prospective vendors to demonstrate their experience and historical performance in providing food service operations. Contractors must document relevant past performance examples showing their capability to manage comprehensive food service operations, including personnel management, equipment procurement and maintenance, supply chain coordination, facility operations, and compliance with food safety standards established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The form evaluates contractors' ability to meet the performance standards outlined in the Performance Work Statement and their experience transitioning food service operations through a structured Transition-In Plan.
The Past Performance form requires vendors to provide detailed information about previous similar contracts or projects, including client references, contract values, performance periods, and specific accomplishments demonstrating their capacity to deliver the full-scale food services required at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. Evaluators use this documentation to assess contractor reliability, technical competence, financial stability, and compliance history. Vendors should present examples that directly correlate to the scope of work defined in the solicitation, emphasizing experience with institutional food service operations, regulatory compliance, quality assurance, and successful contract performance within the federal contracting environment or comparable commercial settings.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP 6923G226R000002
ATTACHMENT 4
FOOD SERVICES AT THE US MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY, NY
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
FULL FOOD SERVICE PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the offeror)
1. Contractor’s Title, Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact: ___________________________________
3. Phone Number (with area code): __________________________
4. Contract Number: ________________
5. Description / Explanation of contract services provided
SECTION B: Respondent Information: (To be completed by Respondent, i.e., Commercial Sector or Government)
1. Respondent’s Title, Name and Address:
2. Phone Number & email address: __________________________________________________
3. Contract Specifics:
a. Contract Number:
b. Contract Type: Firm-Fixed-Price Indefinite Quantity/Task Order Cost-Reimbursement
c. Start Date / End Date:
d. Original Contract Amount:
e. Current Contract Value:
f. Estimated Value at Completion:
Please e-mail the completed questionnaire by 7/30/2026 to: durba.ray@DOT.GOV; felizc@usmma.edu
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OFFEROR’S REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Complete this questionnaire using the grading system explained below. Your assessment should only consider performance for which the contractor is responsible and accountable. Each offeror shall be assigned one the following ratings:
(HS) HIGH CONFIDENCE - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
(MC) MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
(LC): LOW CONFIDENCE: Performance hardly meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some major problems for which corrective action taken b the contractor appear or were not so satisfactory.
(U) UNSATISFACTORY/NO CONFIDENCE - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) NOT APPLICABLE/UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area is not applicable to effort assessed.
2. Please circle the rating, the appropriate letter, for each item on the questionnaire, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. Provide frank, concise comments or supporting narrative explanations in the spaces provided. When responding to the descriptive statements, select the answer, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. You may use additional sheets if more space is needed.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS
a. Quality of services received was satisfactory. Any dissatisfaction, please explain.
HS MC LC U N
b. Quality of food provided was satisfactory. Any dissatisfaction, please explain.
HS MC LC U N
c. Variety of food provided was satisfactory. Any dissatisfaction, please explain.
HS MC LC U N
d. Contractor met established work schedules to complete all performance requirements. (Yes/No). What were the causes of any schedule variances? (Explain)?
HS MC LC U N
e. Randomly performed required 100 % surveillance procedures (Yes/No)? Discrepancies where identified by Periodic or Customer complaint methods? (Circle one). Did offeror re-perform the service promptly?
HS MC LC U N
f. Was money deducted for services not received? If yes, please explain
g. Has the necessary experience and knowledge of the full food service industry? (Yes/No). Explain any negative comments.
h. Had the necessary manpower to perform during the initial start-up period in an efficient and timely manner.
HS MC LC U N
i. Provided the necessary manpower to perform.
HS MC LC U N
j. Adequately complied with all Federal and mandated sanitation requirements.
HS MC LC U N
k. Provided all reports required by your contract in a timely manner.
HS MC LC U N
l. Identified problems in advance and when necessary, took positive and effective corrective actions.
HS MC LC U N
m. Offeror provided effective Quality Control/Inspection procedures.
HS MC LC U N
n. Offeror has a history of recurring problems? (Yes/No). If yes, please explain.
o. Met terms of the contract and within the contractual price.
HS MC LC U N
p. Responded timely and professionally to your needs in performing emergency responses.
HS MC LC U N
q. Responsive to the quality program by identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies.
HS MC LC U N
r. How well did the contractor safeguard, track and account for Government Furnished Property?
HS MC LC U N
s. List the contractor’s documented strength in performing the contract requirements and rate them.
t. List the contractor’s top documented weaknesses in performing the contract requirements and rate them.
HS MC LC U N
u. Is there any indications that the contractor has financial concerns that would jeopardize contract performance? (If YES, please explain in “Remarks” section)
HS MC LC U N
v. Contract managers have sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions necessary to ensure services were performed.
HS MC LC U N
w. Were there any problems with employees or subcontractors payments? (Yes/No). Explain any negative response.
x. Submit changes to the schedule due to manning shortages or broken equipment.
HS MC LC U N
y. Any replacement in contract managers during the duration of the contract period of performance? (Yes/No). If yes, please explain.
z. Was it ever elected not to exercise an option due to the contractor’s poor performance? (Yes/No). If yes, please explain.
aa. Do you have any reservations in awarding another contract to the offeror? (Yes/No). If yes, please explain.
ab. Select one rating which most accurately describes the contractors’ overall performance on your contract.
HS MC LC U N
Attachment 3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .