Attachment 4- OPPD.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Harbor Pilot Services for NBVC
- Solicitation number
- M00244-25-Q-S166
About this file
This document is an Offeror's Past Performance Data form for a Harbor Pilot Services solicitation (N00024-25-Q-S166) issued by NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center San Diego. The form is designed to collect detailed past performance information from potential contractors, focusing on evaluating their quality of service, responsiveness, timeliness, and overall performance history through a comprehensive questionnaire.
The associated federal contract opportunity is a small business set-aside for commercial Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) harbor pilot services at Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) in Oxnard Harbor, Port Hueneme, California. The solicitation requires providers to facilitate safe movements of incoming and outgoing U.S. military vessels, with NAICS code 488330 for Navigational Services to Shipping. Prospective offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) prior to contract award, and proposals are to be submitted according to the solicitation's specified requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1- PWS.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis- RFQ N0024425QS166.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3- WD 2015-5625 Ventura County.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00024-25-Q-S166
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Patricia Castillo Phone: (619) 556-5523 Email: patricia.castillo26.civ@us.navy.mil
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .