Attachment 4 - Evaluation of Offerors.pdf
PDF 687 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA441720Q0021
About this file
This addendum to the solicitation provides evaluation criteria for the Grease Traps, Sewage Lift Stations & Holding Tanks Maintenance contract at Hurlburt Field Air Force Base. Price and three technical factors will be evaluated using a lowest price technically acceptable approach. Price must be determined fair and reasonable, and technical submissions must receive an acceptable rating under emergency response plan, accident prevention plan, and company safety plan subfactors by demonstrating adequate procedures to respond to emergencies within four hours and address spill response and safety precautions as required by the performance work statement. The Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command will award a contract for these maintenance services to the lowest priced technically acceptable offeror by August 24, 2020.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4 - FA441720Q0021
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL ITEMS
1. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
This acquisition will utilize the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) evaluation approach. The award will be made to the lowest priced offeror who has been determined to be technically acceptable. The evaluation factors are described below:
Factor 1: Price
Factor 2: Technical
The evaluation approach does not permit tradeoffs between price, cost, and past performance. It will include an evaluation for technical acceptability.
2. SYNOPSIS OF EVALUATION
The first step of the evaluation process is to rank each offeror by price from lowest to highest.
The Government will then ensure the lowest priced quote adheres to all submission requirements IAW the Attachment 3, Addendum to 52.212-1 and proceed to evaluate the lowest priced responsive offeror’s Technical Submission. If the lowest offeror’s Technical Submission is deemed acceptable, the offeror is determined responsible, and the price is determined fair and reasonable, then the Government will proceed to award to this offeror and no further evaluations will be conducted.
If the lowest offeror receives a technical rating other than acceptable, the Government will follow the same evaluation method for the next lowest offeror until an offer is found with a rating of acceptable or until all quotes have been evaluated. During all stages of the evaluations, the Government reserves the right to engage with one or multiple offerors, but is not required to do
so. Therefore, offerors should provide their best available pricing in their initial quote.
3. PRICE EVALUATION
To receive an acceptable rating for the Price Factor, the offeror’s price must 1) adhere to all requirements of 52.212-1 and accompanying addendum and 2) be determined fair and reasonable.
Total price will be calculated by totaling all CLINs inclusive of all option years and the option to extend services IAW FAR 52.217-8. FAR 52.217-8 will be included in the price evaluation by adding 50% of the value of each CLIN in option year four to the total price. This amount is for evaluation purposes only and will not be included in the awarded contract value. Prices will be rounded off to two decimal points. Total price will be evaluated for price reasonableness IAW at least one of the methods indicated in FAR 13.106-3(a).
4. TECHNICAL EVALUATION
The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposal based on an acceptable or unacceptable basis. Offerors must receive a rating of “Acceptable” in all subfactors to receive an overall rating of Technically Acceptable. The subfactors are as follows:
Attachment 4 - FA441720Q0021
Subfactor 1: Emergency Response Plan
Criteria: The offeror shall submit a plan explaining how emergency responses will be completed within the required four-hour response time.
Technical Merit: To receive an Acceptable rating for this subfactor, the offeror must adequately demonstrate reasonable approach on how the contractor will respond to an emergency with the required four hours as detailed in the PWS paragraph 1.1.
Subfactor 2: Accident Prevention Plan
Criteria: The offeror shall submit a plan detailing the procedures and methods to be utilized in response to spills, hazardous or non-hazardous.
Technical Merit: To receive an Acceptable rating for this subfactor, offeror must adequately demonstrate the approach in the methods and procedures utilized in response to a spill at the job site as detailed in the PWS paragraphs: 4.5; 4.5.2; and 4.5.3.
Subfactor 3: Company Safety Plan
Criteria: The offeror shall submit detailed plan identifying hazards and safety precautions associated with this contract.
Technical Merit: To receive an Acceptable rating for this subfactor, the offeror must adequately demonstrate the approach in identifying and detailing all hazards and safety precautions associated with this contract as detailed in the PWS paragraphs: 4.5.1; 4.5.2; and 4.5.3. This submission shall include compliance to company's employees and subcontractors associated with the contract.
(End of Addendum)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .