Attachment 4 - Evaluation Factors.pdf

PDF 69 KB Posted

Attached to
Cyclone/Equivalent Dust Collector
Solicitation number
FA441924Q0051
Issued by

About this file

This document is the Evaluation Factors attachment for a federal solicitation. It details the evaluation criteria that will be used to assess quotes submitted in response to the solicitation. The key details are:

The solicitation will be awarded to the responsible offeror whose conforming quote is the most advantageous to the Government, based on two evaluation factors: 1) Price, where award will be made to the lowest priced technically acceptable quote, and 2) Technical, where quotes will be rated as either "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" based on how well they meet the Salient Characteristics. Offerors must complete a separate technical submission document to be evaluated under the Technical factor. The solicitation is for the acquisition of Cyclone or Equivalent Dust Collectors for delivery and installation at Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4

Evaluation Factors

F1B3S24192A001

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

(NOV 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotes:

1. Price

2. Technical Acceptability

(End of provision)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2: Best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price. By submission of its quote, the vendor accepts all solicitation requirements, including all technical requirements and terms and conditions. Failure to conform to solicitation requirements may result in a quote being determined not awardable without further evaluation. The evaluation criteria are detailed below:

Factor 1 – Price. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose quotation conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government. Award will be made to the lowest price technically acceptable. Factor 2 –

Technical. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the vendor’s quoted item meets all of the provided information from the Salient Characteristics. Each vendor’s quote will be evaluated against technical requirements and will be assigned a rating of “acceptable” or

“unacceptable.” Technical submission must be completed using a secondary document. The

Technical information shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Quotes shall not simply rephrase or restate the Salient Characteristics or contain general statements such as “Standard procedures will be employed.” Proposals shall provide convincing rationale addressing how the technical portion of the offer meets solicitation requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s experience. The Government will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offer.

Rating Description:

“Acceptable” - Quote clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

“Unacceptable” - Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The quote will be determined technically acceptable if it meets the requirements set out in the

Attachment 1 – Salient Characteristics

(End of provision)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .