Attachment 4 - Evaluation Factors .pdf
PDF 287 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WSA JA COURTROOM AV UPGRADES
- Solicitation number
- FA441924Q0045
About this file
This document is the Evaluation Factors attachment for Solicitation FA441924Q0045 for the WSA JA Courtroom AV Upgrades contract opportunity.
The solicitation seeks proposals for substantial audio/visual/network/projection upgrades to the courtroom at Altus AFB, OK to meet federal court system technology standards. The preferred product is "Wolf vision", but other products meeting the salient characteristics in the Statement of Objectives will also be considered technically acceptable. The award will be made to the responsible offeror whose quote is technically acceptable and has the lowest evaluated price. Quotes will be evaluated on two factors: 1) Price, with the total evaluated price determined by the total of the single CLIN 0001, and 2) Technical Acceptability, where quotes will be rated as "Acceptable" if they meet the specifications or "Unacceptable" if they do not. The contracting officer must determine the price to be fair and reasonable prior to award.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4 - Evaluation Factors
FA441924Q0045
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES
(May 2024)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1. Price
2.Technical Acceptability
(End of provision)
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2:
Most advantageous to the Government is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price. By submission of its quote, the vendor accepts all solicitation requirements, including all technical requirements and terms and conditions. Failure to conform to solicitation requirements may result in a quote being determined not awardable without further evaluation. The evaluation criteria are detailed below: Factor 1: Price The total evaluated price will be determined by the total of CLIN 0001. Before a contract may be awarded, the contracting officer must determine the price fair and reasonable per FAR 13.106-3. No telephonic responses will be processed. Factor 2: Technical Acceptability The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the vendor’s quoted item meets all of the provided salient characteristics for the required item. Each vendor’s quote will be evaluated against technical requirements and will be assigned a rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable.” Rating Description: “Acceptable” - Quote clearly meets the items specifications of the solicitation. “Unacceptable” - Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. The quote will be determined technically acceptable if it reflects the salient physical, functional, or performance characteristic specified in Attachment 1 – SOO, "Technical Requirements" section, of this solicitation.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .