Attachment 4 - Evaluation Criteria.pdf

ATTACHMENT 4 – Evaluation Criteria Solicitation No: 1240BH26Q0007

Project Name: GAOA MGVC Deferred Maintenance Phase 1

Rev. 11/5/25

Comparative Analysis Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria

The provision at FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services is not applicable to this solicitation. In lieu of this provision, quotes will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 12.203 based on the criteria listed below. Award will be made to the offeror(s) representing the best value to the Government.

Technical Response Instructions

The technical response will be used to make an evaluation and arrive at a determination as to whether the response will meet the requirements of the Government. Therefore, the technical response must present sufficient information to reflect a thorough understanding of the requirements and a detailed description of techniques, procedures and program for achieving the objectives of the specifications/statement of work. At a minimum the technical response should clearly address the following:

FACTOR 1 – Experience of Key Personnel:

Explain in detail the Project Manager and Site Superintendent responsible for the work being completed. Provide these persons’ skill level, years of experience, and classification via a resume. The Government will assess the quality and extent of the qualifications of the offerors proposed personnel based on a detailed review of the content of submitted resume. Personnel will be evaluated on education and experience to the extent it adds value to accomplishing this project.

FACTOR 2 – Past Performance and Experience:

Submit a list of relevant projects completed within the last six (6) years that are similar in scope and complexity to this one. Include at least two projects on which you performed successfully in similar climates (coastal Southeast or Southcentral Alaska) and in communities not located on a road system. Offerors may include project photos or other information related to experience if desired. For each project, submit the project name, location, description of the work, dollar value and name/phone/email of project owner representative (Attachment 6 to this solicitation is a Past Performance Form that is optional for use.) Proposals should address (at a minimum) the following experience:

a. Facilities renovation projects which are similar in scope and complexity.

b. Construction projects located in communities not located on a road system.

c. Construction or other projects located in cool, damp coastal maritime climates (coastal

Southeast or Southcentral Alaska).

d. Any other type of experience that is similar in scope to this project.

ATTACHMENT 4 – Evaluation Criteria Solicitation No: 1240BH26Q0007

Project Name: GAOA MGVC Deferred Maintenance Phase 1

Rev. 11/5/25

FACTOR 3 – Proposed Approach to Performing the Work:

Describe your planned approach to performing this work, including specific reference to the following:

a. How will you deliver equipment and materials/supplies to the job site including moving equipment and materials within the site?

b. How will you accomplish off site debris disposal?

c. Proposed sequence of major construction milestones, i.e. utility work, construction of the addition, HVAC replacement, heating oil fuel system decommissioning, flooring and stone repointing.

d. Identify your Quality Control manager; provide information regarding their experience and qualifications.

e. Submit a draft Quality Control plan.

f. Provide a preliminary schedule and sequence of work showing major project milestones and dates and ensuring completion within the required period of performance.

The following Confidence Rating Table will be used in evaluation Offeror’s responses to the Technical Evaluation Factors listed above.

Confidence Rating

Definition

High Confidence (Low Risk)

The government has high confidence that the vendor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention.

Some Confidence (Moderate Risk)

The Government has some confidence that the vendor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach and will be successful in the performing the contract with some Government intervention.

Low Confidence (High Risk)

The Government has low confidence that the vendor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach or will be successful in the performing the contract even with some Government intervention.

Evaluation Method

The Government intends to evaluate quotations using a comparative evaluation methodology.

This means quotations will be compared against one another to determine which provides the best value to the Government, based on the evaluation factors outlined in this solicitation.

The Government may consider quotations that exceed minimum requirements and offer additional value or benefits, even if they are not the lowest priced. However, formal tradeoff procedures will not be conducted.