Attachment 3 - TSSOM FY23 Engine Brand Name Justification.pdf

PDF 208 KB Posted

Attached to
Training Ship State of Maine FY23 Engine Inspections
Solicitation number
6933A223Q000011
Issued by

About this file

This memorandum provides a brand name justification for engine inspection and repair services for the Training Ship State of Maine. The main propulsion engine and three diesel generator engines on the ship are MaK models that require all work to be completed by authorized MaK Original Equipment Manufacturer certified service personnel. As such, the requirement will be solicited on a brand name basis and is open to all authorized MaK certified vendors. No additional efforts will be made to obtain competition, and no actions have been taken to preclude future brand name awards. The related solicitation is number 6933A223Q000011 for Training Ship State of Maine FY23 Engine Inspections issued by the Department of Transportation Maritime Administration.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation

Maritime Administration

BRAND NAME REQUIREMENT JUSTIFICATION

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLIES/SERVICES REQUIRED

This requirement is for Engine Inspection and Repair Services for the Training Ship State of Maine.

2. JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLICITING A BRAND NAME

The main propulsion engine on the State of Maine is an MaK Model 6M601. The three diesel generator engines on the ship are MaK Model 6M332. All work must be completed by authorized MaK Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) certified service personnel.

Therefore, this requirement is being solicited on that basis.

3. EFFORTS TO OBTAIN COMPETITION

This requirement is solicited on a brand name basis due to manufacturer’s requirements. It will be open to all authorized MaK certified vendors. Therefore, no additional efforts will be made to obtain competition for this specific requirement.

4. STEPS TO PRECLUDE FUTURE BRAND NAME AWARDS

Because the requirement for OEM authorized personnel is a manufacturer’s requirement, no actions have been taken to preclude future brand name awards.

5. OTHER FACTORS

N/A.

6. REQUIRING ACTIVITY DETERMINATION

As the technical or requirement personnel, I certify that the evidence of the supporting data that forms the basis of this justification is complete and accurate.

MATT O'DONNELL, SURVEYOR/PORT ENGINEER

REQUISTIONER PRINTED NAME & TITLE

SIGNATURE DATE

CONTRACTING OFFICER’S DETERMINATION

I have determined, in accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b)(1), that the circumstances of this procurement action deem only a brand name is reasonably available.

CONTRACTING OFFICER SIGNATURE & DATE

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLIES/SERVICES REQUIRED
2. JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLICITING A BRAND NAME
3. EFFORTS TO OBTAIN COMPETITION
4. STEPS TO PRECLUDE FUTURE BRAND NAME AWARDS
5. OTHER FACTORS
6. REQUIRING ACTIVITY DETERMINATION
CONTRACTING OFFICER’S DETERMINATION
2023-05-14T12:23:22-0400
MATTHEW GREGORY ODONNELL
DATE: 5/14/2023
2023-06-05T17:04:40-0400
LANA ELIZABETH DENNING

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .