ATTACHMENT 3_ Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Regional Innovation Clusters Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 47QACA26R0295
About this file
This file is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor performance on federal contracts. The questionnaire captures evaluation data through a standardized Performance Rating Form that collects basic contract information (company name, address, contract number, period of performance, contract value, and contract type) along with the evaluator's details and contact information.
The evaluation framework assesses eight performance elements across four categories using a three-tier confidence rating system (High, Medium, or Low Confidence). Technical Performance is measured through quality of technical approach and understanding of requirements. Timeliness of Performance evaluates effective resource utilization and schedule adherence. Quality/Customer Satisfaction assesses commitment to customer service, business behavior, and communication effectiveness with government officials, technical representatives, end users, and other stakeholders. Cost Control measures planning, monitoring, budget adherence, and cost-effective implementation of changes. Each element allows evaluators to rate performance as Outstanding, Good, or Acceptable, with space for detailed comments explaining ratings. The form concludes with a yes/no question on contractor rehire likelihood and an additional comments section. This template serves as an appendix to the Regional Innovation Clusters solicitation (47QACA26R0295) issued by the Small Business Administration's Office of Investment and Innovation to solicit contractor services for creating regional public-private partnerships focused on technology innovation and economic growth.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Revised ATTACHMENT 5_ QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Revised ATTACHMENT 1_ PROVISION_CLAUSE PACKAGE.docx | DOCX document | |
| Revised Solicitation RFP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Revised ATTACHMENT 3_ Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Revised Pricing ATTACHMENT 4.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 1_ PROVISION_CLAUSE PACKAGE.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 4_ Price Schedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation RFP.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 5_ QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 6_ Sample PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 RICs SOO.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire The following standards shall be used in arriving at the rating.
| High Confidence |
| The Government has high confidence that the Quoter understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, to include its proposed cluster qualifications and key personnel and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention. |
| Medium Confidence |
| The Government has medium confidence that the Quoter understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, to include its proposed cluster qualifications and key personnel and will be successful in performing the contract with medium Government intervention. |
| Low Confidence |
| The Government has low confidence that the Quoter understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, to include its proposed cluster qualifications and key personnel or will be successful in performing the contract even with Government intervention. |
Performance Rating Form
Name of Company Evaluated:
Address of Company Evaluated:
| Contract Number: |
| Contract Period of Performance |
| Contract Value |
| Contract Type |
Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative Name, Address, Telephone Number and Email Address
Type of Services Performed:
| Name of Evaluator, Company/Agency, Address, Telephone Number and Email Address |
| Date Evaluation Provided |
| Performance Element |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
Technical Performance (Quality of Product or Service)
1. Quality of Technical Approach
(For example: Were the services comprehensive, complete, and feasible? (Metthe needs, performed successfully, and accommodated changing requirements.)
2. Understanding of the Requirement
(For example: Did the contractor show an understanding of the scope of therequirements and an appreciation of the complexity of the requirements? And did the contractor effectively identify flaws, inconsistencies, and other inaccuracies in your technical direction?)
Timeliness of Performance
3. Effective and Efficient use of Resources
(For example: Was the contractor able to obtain in a timely manner the amountand type of personnel resources required to support the project, effectively train personnel to perform the work required for the project, and maintain the required workforce throughout the term of the contract?)
4. Timeliness of Performance
(For example: Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realisticschedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)
Quality / Customer Satisfaction
5. Quality of Performance/Customer Satisfaction
(For example: Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?)
6. Business Behavior
(For example: Was the contractor reasonable and cooperative at the corporateand program levels in response to changes in technical direction, correcting errors, poor performance, criticism/rejection of contract deliverables and other quality issues?)
7. Communication
(For example: Did the contractor work and communicate well with contractingofficers, contracting officer’s technical representatives, end users, other contractors, subcontractors, and in-house staff?)
Cost Control
8. Cost Control
(For example: Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realisticcosts, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost-effective manner?)
| For #9, Please Answer “Yes” or “No”, as appropriate |
| YES or No |
9. Given the choice, would you do business with this contractor again?
Additional Comment Form Please provide any additional comments regarding your performance element ratings in the space below. Please add additional pages as necessary.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .