Attachment 3 QASP Saco plow.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12444323Q0002
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 12444323Q0002 Questions and Answers 12-08-2022.docx | DOCX document | |
| 12444323Q0002 Questions and Answers 12-01-2022.docx | DOCX document | |
| 12444323Q0002 WMNF RFQ.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 PWS Saco Plow.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 5 FS-List of Sustainable Products Saco snow removal.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Updated Schedule_of_Items_SACO_Plow.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 6 Wage Determination Carroll County.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 Saco Ranger Station map 2020-2021.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACT NO. ______________________
Winter Snow Removal White Mountain National Forest
SACO RANGER DISTRICT
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
1. INTRODUCTION:
This quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP) will be used to ensure service levels are received that meet the requirements listed in the contract performance work statement. The plan sets forth the procedures and guidelines the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) will use to ensure performance standards are achieved by the contractor.
The Forest Service relies on the Contractor’s existing quality assurance system for commercial services as a substitute for Government inspection and testing before tender for acceptance unless customary market practices for the commercial service being acquired include in-process inspection. Any in-process inspection by the Government shall be conducted in a manner consistent with commercial practice. The Forest Service may conduct quality assurance for its benefit and has the right to refuse acceptance of nonconforming services. Quality issues with services tendered for acceptance or rejected by the Government shall be resolved under Contract Clause FAR 52.212-4(a), “Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items”.
2. METHODOLOGIES:
Simplified surveillance methods will be used by the COR to evaluate contractor performance. The primary methods of surveillance are
· Random monitoring through observations performed by the COR
· Valid Customer Complaint
· Review of Deliverables
· Review of Contractor inspection reports
3. The acceptable quality levels are provided in the contract Performance Requirements Summary Table:
| Performance Requirements Summary Table PWS Para # |
| Required Services |
| Performance Standards |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
(AQL)
Monitoring Method
| 1-5 |
| Removal of snow |
| Snow is removed from driveways and parking areas |
| 100% of snow is removed from parking areas and driveways |
| COR observation |
Valid customer complaint
| 1-9, 1-11 |
| Scheduling Services |
| By 1630 EST the day of snowfall or 0700 the day following snowfall, whichever comes first |
| No more than 1 occurrence per month where services are not delivered on schedule. |
| COR Observations |
Valid customer complaint
4. Documenting Performance: The COR will document surveillances/observations on the attached form.
5. Inspection and Acceptance will be in accordance with FAR 52.212-4(a) – Commercial Terms and Conditions – Commercial Items (Oct 2018) Inspection/Acceptance.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
MONITORING FORM
SERVICE OR STANDARD:
SURVEY PERIOD:
SURVEILLANCE METHOD (Check):
Random Monitoring Report Review Customer Complaint Review of Contractor Inspection Reports LEVEL OF SURVEILLANCE (Check):
| Weekly | Monthly | As Required | |
| PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS SAMPLED DURING SURVEY PERIOD: | ______ % |
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS:
Observed Service Provider Performance Measurement Rate: ______%
| Service Provider’s Performance (Check): | Meets Standards |
| Does Not Meet Standards |
Narrative of Performance During Survey Period:
PREPARED BY: ___________________________________ DATE: _________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .