Attachment 3 - PPQ.pdf

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The 628th Contracting Squadron at Joint Base Charleston, SC is in the process of competitively seeking a source to provide customized Mobility War Trailers for the 437 Maintenance Group/ AMXS. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offeror’s past and present performance on contracts which reflect the Offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have firsthand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror’s performance on those contracts.

Prospective offerors may be contacted regarding problem areas or concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken. However, the individual's name completing the questionnaire will not be disclosed to the Offeror.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance. Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this selection. Please return via email no later than 12 pm EST on 25 April 2025 to Morgan Hart; morgan.hart.1@us.af.mil and Nicole Alvarez;

nicole.alvarez.1@us.af.mil.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

POC Title:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Contract Title:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Requirement (Describe Scope of Contract):

MAGNITUDE:

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Prime Subcontractor

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

Assess how the Contractor: E V S M U NA

Demonstrated the ability to meet salient characteristics and quality standards for this contract

Delivered the requirement on time and within budget

(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

E V S M U NA

Was responsive in communications with Government during and after the contract action (especially if customization of design, engineering or manufacturing were involved in the contract)

Followed through on quoted engineering and manufacturing capabilities

Met expectations regarding safety during production and upon acceptance

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract?

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Yes No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default, convenience or cause?

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: Date:

Print Name: Title:

Telephone:

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.