Attachment 3 - PPQ (21Q-2003).docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HE1254-21-Q-2003
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This document contains a draft solicitation and present and past performance questionnaire for bus safety aide and attendant services in Okinawa, Japan. The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) seeks to award a single-award, firm-fixed price IDIQ contract for five years including a base period of one year and four one-year option periods. The purpose is to provide transportation services for special needs, Sure Start, and pre-K through second grade students attending DoDEA Pacific schools in Okinawa. Services must comply with DoDEA and host nation requirements and may require specialized equipment for students with disabilities. School buses will be provided by the government. The contractor will provide all personnel, supervision, supplies, equipment, and services necessary to safely transport students. Safety has the highest priority, and services must be performed safely, prudently, and professionally. The present and past performance questionnaire is to be completed by offerors and their references to evaluate compliance, practices, performance, and satisfaction on prior contracts.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HE1254-21-Q-2003 Attachment 3
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This Questionnaire Pertains to: Bus Safety Aides & Attendants for Okinawa, Japan
The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the complete PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:
Department of Defense Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: Mileska M. Rodriguez Contracting Officer: Collen C. Pritchard 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350
E-Mail: mileska.rodriguez@dodea.edu E-Mail: colleen.pritchard@dodea.edu
This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.
| Contractor Information: | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number: E-mail Address:
Point of Contact: Point of Contact Number:
Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
Reference Information:
Business Name of Reference: Address:
Phone Number: E-mail Address:
Point of Contact: Point of Contact Number:
Contract Number: Final Contract Value:
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Period of Performance:
Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFQ.
Explain any problems and resolutions
This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor/Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral/N/A |
Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.
Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.
Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.
No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available.
1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones? Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG |_| E |_| N |_|
2. How would you rate the contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)? Comments:
3. How would you rate the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service/timeliness of performance/report submission? Comments:
4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract? Comments:
5. How would you rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer? Comments:
6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? Comments:
7. Would you purchase services from this contractor again? Comments:
|_| YES |_| NO
Please provide any additional comments applicable to the contractor’s past performance:
Present and Past Performance Questionnaire
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .