Attachment 3- Performance Risk Assessment Questionaire (PRAQ).pdf
PDF 296 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Basic Life Support Emergency Medical Services
- Solicitation number
- W25G1V-22-R-0045
About this file
This document contains a performance assessment questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity to provide basic life support emergency medical services. The U.S. Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground is soliciting past performance evaluations from references provided by offerors as part of its competitive evaluation for solicitation number W25G1V-22-R-0045. Respondents are asked to evaluate offerors on contracts similar in scope to NAICS code 621910 and provide ratings and rationales for compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, customer satisfaction, and any other relevant performance information. Completed questionnaires must be returned within 15 days of receipt to the contracting officer.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Question and Answers_W25G1V-22-R-0045 REV 1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Question and Answers_W25G1V-22-R-0045.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FAR 19.704 Subcontracting plan requirements.pdf | ||
| W25G1V-22-R-0045 Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3- Performance Risk Assessment Questionaire (PRAQ) REV.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Government Furnished Property Form.pdf.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| W25G1V-22-R-0045.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND
TOBYHANNA DIVISION
11 HAP ARNOLD BOULEVARD
TOBYHANNA, PENNSYLVANIA 18466-5100
August 16, 2022
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Quotation
(RFQ) W25G1V22R0045
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army ACC-APG, Tobyhanna Division, is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFQ. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 621910. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and return to the ACC-APG, Tobyhanna Division, 11 Hap Arnold Blvd, Tobyhanna PA, 18466, no later than 15 days after receipt of request.
Submit your completed questionnaire via email to nicole.tokash.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at 570-615-9720 or john.e.thomas.civ@army.mil.
Sincerely, John E. Thomas Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: _________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| 2022-08-16T11:24:24-0400 | |
| THOMAS.JOHN.EDWARD.1032787645 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .