Attachment 3 Performance Assessment Questionnaire Small Molecule Compound Library Storage Signed.pdf
PDF 339 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Small Molecule Compound Storage Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W81XWH22R0008
- Issued by
- Department of the Army Medical Command
About this file
This document contains a past performance assessment questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for small molecule compound storage services. The past performance assessment questionnaire is sent to a reference contact to evaluate an offeror's performance on a previous relevant contract for secure storage, inventory management, and distribution of approximately 400,000 chemical samples and 2,000 new samples annually. The offeror is to be evaluated on compliance with requirements and standards, project management effectiveness including subcontractor control, timeliness of deliverables, cost control on cost reimbursement contracts, and overall customer satisfaction. The completed questionnaire must be returned by November 19, 2021. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number W81XWH22R0008 seeking secure storage of chemical samples under appropriate environmental conditions, inventory management, and distribution of approximately 4,500 samples annually to the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and its collaborators. The Department of the Army Medical Command is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 PWS-Small_Molecule_Compound_Library_Storage 15 Nov 2021.pdf | ||
| W81XWH22R0008 Combined Synopsis Solicitation Amendment 0001 15 Nov 2021.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 Questions to Solicitation W81XWH22R0008 15 Nov 2021.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 PWS-Small_Molecule_Compound_Library_Storage 4 Nov 2021.pdf | ||
| W81XWH22R0008 Combined Synopsis Solicitation 4 Nov 2021.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 QASP-Small_Molecule_Compound_Library_Storage 4 November 2021.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQUISITION ACTIVITY
820 CHANDLER STREET
FORT DETRICK MD 21702-5014
FCMR-ACO-AA 4 November 2021
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W81XWH22R0008 Small Molecule Compound Storage Library
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity (USAMRAA) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate Offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the Offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 493190. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and return to the USAMRAA, 820 Chandler St.
Ft. Detrick, MD 21702, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 19 November 2021, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Jaclyn.p.svincek.civ@mail.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at patrick.k.harris11.civ@mail.mil.
Sincerely, PATRICK K. HARRIS
Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The Offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The Offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The Offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The Offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Comments:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name):
Telephone Number:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Patrick K. Harris Contracting Officer
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
| 2021-11-04T15:31:18-0400 | |
| HARRIS.PATRICK.K.1395451320 |
| 2021-11-04T15:31:39-0400 | |
| HARRIS.PATRICK.K.1395451320 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .