Attachment 3 Performance Assessment Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 233 KB Posted

Attached to
IDIQ JOB ORDER CONTRACT, FORT STEWART AND HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD, GA
Solicitation number
WG-54-0J
Issued by

About this file

This document includes a performance assessment questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The performance assessment questionnaire is a template for evaluating offerors on an Army contract for job order contracting services at Fort Stewart and Hunter Army Airfield in Georgia. It requests ratings and rationales on compliance, project management, timeliness, customer satisfaction, and other performance factors. The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity job order contract. The contractor will provide all labor, materials, equipment, and supervision to complete individual task orders for construction and facility-related work across various trades. Task orders will cover tasks like carpentry, plumbing, HVAC, electrical, concrete, and demolition. The contractor must provide the proprietary Gordian job order contracting system applications and construction task catalog for use by the government. The performance period is for one base year plus four option years.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

Mission Installation Contracting Command (MICC) – Fort Stewart 976 William H. Wilson Ave

Bldg. 621, Suite 100 Fort Stewart, GA 31314

17 July 2020

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) W9124M-20-R-0009

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army MICC is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 236220. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the

Mission Installation Contracting Command 976 William H. Wilson Ave Bldg. 621, Suite 100 Fort Stewart GA 31314 Attention: Mary Hightower

No later than 15 days after receipt of request or 8/20/2020, whichever occurs first.

Submit your completed questionnaire to mary.l.hightower2.civ@mail.mil and sheung.c.li.civ@mail.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at mary.l.hightower2.civ@mail.mil.

Sincerely, Mary L. Hightower Contracting Officer mailto:mary.l.hightower2.civ@mail.mil mailto:sheung.c.li.civ@mail.mil

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

2020-07-17T10:44:23-0400
HIGHTOWER.MARY.L.1061801355

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .