Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation 1232SA26Q0398.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Janitorial Services (Base Year + Four Option Years) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1232SA26Q0398
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for Solicitation 1232SA26Q0398, issued by the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Contracting Operations Branch/Acquisition and Property Division. The form is used to collect evaluations of contractor past performance from government agencies or commercial companies that have previously worked with the offeror. The questionnaire requests information about the offeror being evaluated, including the contract number, delivery/task order number, contract title, location, award date, completion date, and contract value, along with details about whether the offeror performed as a prime contractor or sub-contractor. The government reserves the right to verify all information provided on the form.
The questionnaire requires evaluators to rate contractor performance across thirteen detailed criteria using a standardized five-point scale: "E" (Exceptional), "VG" (Very Good), "S" (Satisfactory), "M" (Marginal), and "U" (Unacceptable), with "NA" (Not Applicable) also available. Rated categories include the offeror's relationship with the client team, subcontractor management, employee recruitment and retention, corporate management and integrity, work quality, quality control, schedule adherence, cost control, labor and safety compliance, and timely documentation submission. The form also includes yes/no questions regarding cure notices, performance problem resolution, future contract award likelihood, customer satisfaction, and whether the firm was given opportunity to respond to negative comments. Evaluators must provide supporting information for any Marginal or Unacceptable ratings and sign and date the completed form.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 Performance Work Statement Janitorial Services.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 Terms and Conditions Solicitation 1232SA26Q0398.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 Quotation Pricing Sheet Solicitation 1232SA26Q0398.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Contracting Operations Branch/Acquisition and Property Division is requesting past performance information referencing requirements for Solicitation 1232SA26Q0398. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
Offeror Information
Name of Offeror Being Evaluated:
Address of Offeror Being Evaluated:
Project Information
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number:
Contract/Project Title:
Location:
Award Date:
Completion Date:
Contract Value:
| Offeror Performed As: |
| |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub-Contractor |
Description of Work Performed:
Evaluator Information
Name of Evaluator:
Government Agency/Commercial Company:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Position Held in Relation to this Project:
Rating: Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation.
DO NOT RATE ON A “+” OR “-” SCALE. If a “+” or “-” is used, the rating without the “+” or “-” will be applied. If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
| “E” |
| Exceptional |
| Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “VG” |
| Very Good |
| Performance exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “S” |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met the contract requirements. |
| “M” |
| Marginal |
| Performance met the minimum contract requirements, but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory. |
| “U” |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements. |
| “NA” |
| Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract. |
Please rate and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:
| 1. The relationship between the Offeror and client’s/customer’s contract team: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 2. The Offeror’s management and coordination of subcontractors: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 3. Ability/actions to hire and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees for the performance of the contract work: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 4. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 5. Quality of work: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 6. Quality control: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 7. Ability to meet the performance schedule: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 8. Ability/actions to improve schedule problems, if applicable: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 9. Ability to control costs and provide the required work at a reasonable total price: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 10. Compliance with labor standards, as applicable: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 11. Compliance with safety standards and/or number of safety related incidents, code compliance, as applicable: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 12. Ability to submit required documentation (work schedule, reports, data, etc.) in a timely manner: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 13. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain: |
| |_| |_| |
Yes No
| 14. Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from your procurement or technical personnel? If no, please explain: |
| |_| |_| |
Yes No
| 15. Would you award another contract to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain: |
| |_| |_| |
Yes No
| 16. Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain: |
| |_| |_| |
Yes No
| 17. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results? |
| |_| |_| |_| |
Yes No NA
18. Additional Remarks:
| 19. Overall rating for this firm: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U
Signature of Evaluator Date
The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its quote firm for 60 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of quotes.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .