Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 469 KB Posted

Attached to
Waste Water Sampling / Testing Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W50S6S22Q0003
Issued by
Department of the Army Arizona Army National Guard

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Waste Water Sampling / Testing, newest first.
File Type Posted
W50S6S22Q0003 Q and A.docx DOCX document
Permit (Redacted).pdf PDF
Amended RFQ W50S6S22Q0003 - Wastewater Sampling Testing.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5 - SCA WD 15-5473 (Rev 14).txt TXT text file
Attachment 6 - 162WG KTR Env Awareness Brochure.pdf PDF
DRAFT RFQ W50S6S22Q0003 - Wastewater Sampling Testing.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 - PWS Waste Water Sampling.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 - Past Performance Reference List.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4 - CERT of 52.204-2425 26 (REV).pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information

A. Contractor’s name and address: __ _________________________________________

B. Point of Contact: _____________________________

C. Phone Number (with area code): _________ __________

D. Contract number: ________________________________________

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project: ___ _______________________________

F. ContractType:
Firm‐Fixed‐PriceIndefinite‐Delivery/IndefiniteQuantityTaskOrderCost‐Reimbursement

G. Contract Award Date: Scheduled Completion Date: _____________________________

H. Contract Award Amount: Current/Final Project Amount: ____________________

I. Contractorbeingevaluatedperformedasthe:
PrimeContractorSubcontractorSupplieronthiscontract/order.

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

_________________________________ Organization:____________________________________
(TypedorPrintedName)

______________________ Address: _______________________________ (Title)

(EmailAddress)
PhoneNumber:_______________________________

NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing the reference information shall not be disclosed.

Source Selection Sensitive

PERFORMANCERATINGQUESTIONNAIRE
(Contractortoforwardtotheirreferencesforcompletion)
(ThisQuestionnaire,whencompleted,shallbetreatedasSourceSelectionSensitiveinaccordance
withFAR3.104‐3andshallnotbedisclosedtoanyoneoutsidetheGovernment)
TheRATINGdefinitionsareasfollows:
EEXCEPTIONAL–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirementsandexceeded/exceedmany
requirementstotheorganization’sbenefit.Nocontractualperformanceproblemsfortheelementbeing
assessedhaveoccurredorifanyminorproblemsoccurredthecorrectiveactionstakenbythecontractor
werehighlyeffective.
VVERYGOOD–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirementsandexceeded/exceedssome
requirementstotheorganization’sbenefit.Thecontractualperformanceoftheelementbeingassessedwas
accomplishedwithsomeminorproblemsforwhichcorrectiveactionstakenbythecontractorwereeffective.
SSATISFACTORY–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirements.Thecontractualperformanceof
theelementbeingassessedwasaccomplishedwithsomeminorproblemsforwhichcorrectiveactionstaken
bythecontractorweresatisfactory.
MMARGINAL–Performancedidnot/doesnotmeetsomecontractualrequirements.Thecontractual
performanceoftheelementbeingassessedreflectsaseriousproblemforwhichthecontractorhasnotyet
identifiedcorrectiveactions,orthecontractor’sproposedactionsappearonlymarginallyeffective,orwere
notfullyimplemented.
UUNSATISFACTORY–Performancedidnot/doesnotmeetmostcontractualrequirementsandrecovery
isnotlikelyinatimelymanner.Thecontractualperformanceoftheelementbeingassessedcontainsserious
problem(s)forwhichthecontractor’scorrectiveactionswereineffectiveorwerenotimplementedtimely.

N NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable.

PERFORMANCERATINGQUESTIONNAIRE
(Contractortoforwardtotheirreferencesforcompletion)
(ThisQuestionnaire,whencompleted,shallbetreatedasSourceSelectionSensitiveinaccordance
withFAR3.104‐3andshallnotbedisclosedtoanyoneoutsidetheGovernment)

The contractor:

1 How efficient was the contractor in abiding by all Rules, Regulations, Laws, and Safety Standards?

2 Were you satisfied with the quality of service performed or items supplied?

3 How effective were the contractor’s quality control and/or inspection procedures?

4 How well did the contractor perform in a respect to timeliness and schedule?

5 How well did the contractor resolve Issues/

Problems/Customer Complaints?

6 How flexible, cooperative, reasonable was the contractor, particularly when faced with short‐notice mission changes or requirements changes?

7 How well was the contractorabletomaintaina
good relationship withagencycontractingand
technical/projectmanagementpersonnel?

8 How likely are you to award another contract to this contractor?

9 Wasthecontractoreverissuedacure or show cause
noticeunderthereferencedcontract?Ifyesexplain
outcomein‘remarks’ sectionbelow.

ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

**Please forward this questionnaire directly to the 162D Wing Contracting Office **

E‐MAIL:

162.WG.MSG.MSC@us.af.mil Subject: W50S6S22Q0003 PPQ

1250948111N Highlight

Text8: Vendor being evaluated
Text9:
Text10:
Text11:
Text12:
Text13:
Text14:
Text15:
Text16:
Text17:
Text18:
Text19:
Text20:
Check Box25: Off
Text26: Individual evaluating vendor above
Text27:
Text28:
Text29:
Text30:
Text31:
Text32:
Text33:
Check Box1: Off
Check Box2: Off
Check Box3: Off
Check Box4: Off
Check Box5: Off
Text7:
Dropdown1: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown3: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown4: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown5: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown6: [Not Applicable]
Dropdown7: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown8: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown9: [Somewhat Likely]
Dropdown10: [No]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .