Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Eielson AFB Medical Courier Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HT941025Q2017
- Issued by
- Defense Health Agency
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template associated with solicitation HT941025Q2017 for Medical Courier Services at the 354th Medical Group, Eielson AFB, Alaska, issued by the Defense Health Agency (DHA). The questionnaire is designed to be completed by previous customers of potential contractors and submitted to John Lam Ho at DHA.
The PPQ evaluates contractor performance across key courier service areas including vehicle condition, timely service delivery during and outside normal operating hours, and manifest documentation. Performance is rated on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory. The form collects detailed information about the reference contract including contract number, type, period of performance, dollar value, and whether the contractor served as prime, subcontractor, teaming partner or joint venture. It also includes sections for explaining any non-satisfactory ratings, documenting contract terminations, and providing additional comments about the contractor's past performance.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions for HT941025Q2017 - Medical Courier Services.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Pricing Worksheet Revised 16 Dec 2024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HT941025Q2017 - CSS.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination 2015-5683 Revision 21.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work - 12 December 2024.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Pricing Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation HT941025Q2017 Attachment 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Defense Health Agency (DHA) is conducting a Fair Opportunity competition. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Solicitation HT941025Q2017 is to provide Medical Courier Services at the 354th Medical Group, Eielson AFB, Alaska.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance and email to John Lam Ho at ho.j.lam.civ@health.mil.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contractor Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Telephone Number:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract Number:
Task Order Number:
Type of Contract:
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services:
MAGNITUDE
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value:
Contractor performed on this contract as:
| Prime |
| Subcontractor |
| Teaming Partner |
| Joint Venture |
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Courier Services
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided vehicle in good operating condition and meeting state requirements
Provided timely courier services between facilities during normal operating hours
Provided timely courier services between facilities outside of normal operating hours
Provided a complete manifest showing materials to be transported to the receiving facility
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Telephone: _________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .