Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
T-EPF ISOTTA FRASCHINI SYSTEMS SSDG IDIQ
Solicitation number
N3220519R6175
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor. The questionnaire is in reference to solicitation number N3220519R6175 for T-EPF ISOTTA FRASCHINI SYSTEMS SSDG IDIQ services issued by the Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command. The contractor is being evaluated on its performance under a previous contract for quality, timeliness, business relations, key personnel, and cost control. References are asked to provide ratings and comments in these areas using definitions provided for exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory performance. Responses to the questionnaire are due by April 23, 2020 to be considered in the evaluation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AMEND 0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 FMSNA SSDG Pricing Worksheet Revised Amend 0003.xls XLS spreadsheet
AMEND 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 FMSNA SSDG Pricing Worksheet Revised Amend 0001.xls XLS spreadsheet
AMEND 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 FMSNA SSDG Pricing Worksheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
N3220519R6175.pdf PDF
Past Performance Data.doc DOC document
Attachment 2 Non-Disclosure_Agreement.docx DOCX document
EPF JA FMSNA SSDG IDIQ_redacted.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, 23 Apr 2020 at 10:00 am E.T. to Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins at alvinia.jenkins@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Alvinia Jenkins
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Mrs. Alvinia Jenkins

Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Mr. Alvinia Jenkins
(Phone Number)(757) 443- 5881
(E-mail Address)Alvinia.jenkins@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .