Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire Court Reporting.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25625Q0054
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for Court Reporting Services for the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Office of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Veterans Integrated Service Network 16 (VISN 16).
The Questionnaire requests the contractor's information, such as contract number, period of performance, and negotiated price, as well as an assessment of the contractor's performance by the evaluator in areas of quality of services, timeliness of performance, and business relations. The evaluator is asked to provide adjectival ratings (Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) for each performance element, identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses, and indicate whether they would award to the contractor again. The completed Questionnaire is to be returned to the VA contact by the solicitation close date of 2:00 pm CST on Thursday, November 14, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - VHA Local BAA Sept 2024.doc | DOC document | |
| 36C25625Q0054_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachmentment 2 - Wage Determination.txt | TXT text file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C25625Q0054
Central Arkansas Veterans Health Care System - Court Reporting Services
CONTRACTOR: PLEASE SENT TO YOUR RATEES. YOUR RATEES ARE TO COMPLETE.
RATEES: PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO ARLENE A. BLADE AT ARLENE.BLADE@VA.GOV, SOLICITATION CLOSE DATE IS 2:00 PM CST THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2024.
I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
Negotiated price or cost at award:
Current estimated contract dollar amount:
Describe service acquired:
II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Name:
Organization:
Phone Number:
Relation to Program:
(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, etc.)
Time On Contract:
III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under pars. III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance adjectival rating under par. III.F based on the attached Adjectival Rating Descriptions. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.
PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.
| EXCELLENT |
| GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
A. QUALITY OF SERVICES
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), for performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.
2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory
| B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: | |
| 1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’s | specific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing administrative reports/documents required by your contract. |
2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
| C. BUSINESS RELATIONS | ||
| 1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct | noncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous and | responsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff? |
2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
D. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:
E. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?
YES |_| NO |_|
If no, please explain:
F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .