Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 81 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- F3ST704296A001
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the Husterhoehe Warehouses Outside Plant Fiber Optic Cable (FOC) Installation project, solicitation number F3ST704296A001, issued by the Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa. The PPQ is designed to evaluate a contractor's past performance across multiple dimensions, including technical compliance, personnel qualifications, communication effectiveness, and overall project execution.
The questionnaire requires a detailed assessment using a six-point rating scale from Exceptional (E) to Neutral (N), covering areas such as technical order compliance, personnel quality, problem resolution, and contract completion. Key evaluation points include the contractor's ability to provide qualified personnel, meet project deadlines, communicate effectively, and avoid property damage. The completed survey must be returned by 09 July 2025 at 1500 CEST, with contact points being Ms. Petra Scholl and TSgt Carleen Clinger. The form also includes sections for documenting strengths, weaknesses, and additional remarks about the contractor's performance.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This PPQ is for the solicitation (No. F3ST704296A001) of Husterhohe Warehouses Outside Plant Fiber Optic Cable (FOC) Install at Husterhohe, Pirmasens, Germany.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name Contractor’s Address
Contractor’s Telephone # (add country code)
Contractor’s Email Address Contractor’s Point of Contact
(POC)
Project Title or Brief Description of Work
Contract Number Contract Amount Contract Period or Dates of Performance
Contract Place of Performance
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the Contracting Office.
Respondent’s Name Respondent’s Title Respondent’s Address
Respondent’s Telephone # (add country code)
Respondent’s Email Address
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM PRIOR TO OFFER DUE DATE OF 09 July 2025 at
1500 CEST:
Ms. Petra Scholl at petra.scholl.de@us.af.mil or TSgt Carleen Clinger at carleen.clinger@us.af.mil
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix below and please provide a narrative explanation for any rating given.
E G S M U N
Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
mailto:carleen.clinger@us.af.mil
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E G S M U N
1. Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to comply with the applicable technical orders required to render services in a timely fashion?
2. Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to provide qualified personnel (to include security/access and proper skill levels)
3. Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to retain qualified personnel?
4. Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to communicate and resolve technical problems timely and thoroughly?
5. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
6. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain outcome in “other remarks.”
YES / NO
7. Did the contractor ever damage any Government property?
If yes, explain the type(s) of damage and what resulted from the damage in “other remarks.”
YES / NO
8. Has the offeror met the required completion date for the service?
If no, please explain how long the service took versus how long it was originally scheduled for in “other remarks.”
YES / NO
9. For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES / NO
10. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES / NO
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Other Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .