Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionaire.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted

Attached to
Human Performance Optimization Services
Solicitation number
FA561326Q0006
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for solicitation FA561326Q0006, issued by the Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa for Human Performance Optimization (HPO) services. The questionnaire must be completed and returned to TSgt Carleen Clinger at carleen.clinger@us.af.mil prior to the offer due date of 13 July 2026. Respondents are required to provide general contractor information including name, address, contact details, and a brief description of work performed, along with identification of whether the contractor served as prime or sub-contractor and key personnel involved.

The PPQ evaluates contractor past performance across nine assessment areas using a six-point rating scale (Exceptional, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Neutral). Evaluation criteria include service turnaround times, ability to comply with performance work statements, qualification and retention of personnel with required certifications, problem communication and resolution, overall performance rating, and whether cure or show cause notices were issued. Additional questions address CPARS rating status and willingness to award future contracts. Respondents must provide narrative explanations for ratings and sections for strengths, weaknesses, and other remarks. This questionnaire is a template document designed to assess the qualifications and performance history of contractors bidding on the 435th Air Ground Operations Wing HPO services contract, which requires certified professionals in strength/conditioning, clinical social work, physical therapy, and operational psychology.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
HPO Consolidated Questions_Answers.pdf PDF
Revised HPO PWS_062326.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - HPO PWS.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA561326Q0006 V1.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

This PPQ is for the solicitation (No. FA561326Q0006) of 435th AGOW Human Performance Optimization (HPO) services across various German locations.

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name

Contractor’s Address

Contractor’s Telephone # (add country code)

Contractor’s Email Address

Contractor’s Point of Contact (POC)

Brief Description of Work (services conducted)

Type Personnel Serviced (Military, Special Warfare Military, Civilian)

Contract Number

Contract Amount

Contract Period or Dates of Performance

Contract Place of Performance

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the Contracting Office.

Respondent’s Name

Respondent’s Title

Respondent’s Address

Respondent’s Telephone # (add country code)

Respondent’s Email Address

C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM PRIOR TO OFFER DUE DATE OF 13 July 2026.

TSgt Carleen Clinger at carleen.clinger@us.af.mil Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix below and please provide a narrative explanation for any rating given.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Has the offeror met required service turnaround times?
2.
Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to comply with the applicable performance work statement/statement of work to render services in a timely fashion?
3.
Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to provide qualified personnel (to include certifications)
4.
Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to retain qualified personnel?
5.
Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to communicate and resolve problems timely and thoroughly?
6.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
7.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain outcome in “other remarks.”

YES / NO

8.
For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES / NO
9.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES / NO

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Other Remarks:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .