Attachment 3 - Evaluation Process.pdf
PDF 109 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- MSU-RFP-2025-0644
- Issued by
- Cascade County, Great Falls City, Montana
About this file
The document is an Attachment 3 - Evaluation Process for a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the State of Montana for virtual mental health and well-being services to be provided to the students of Great Falls College MSU. The evaluation criteria include Specifications (60% of 300 points), Offeror Qualifications/Informal Requirements (10% of 100 points), and Cost Proposal (20% of 100 points). The Specifications section is further divided into Services (200 points) and Vendor Support (100 points). The Offeror Qualifications/Informal Requirements include References (50 points), Company Profile and Resume (50 points), and Provider Licensure (pass/fail). The Cost Proposal will be evaluated based on the lowest responsive offer, with the lowest cost receiving the maximum 100 points.
The State and local jurisdictions involved are the State of Montana, Cascade County, and Great Falls City. The contract opportunity is described as providing virtual mental health and well-being services to the students of Great Falls College MSU.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1249026-event.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Cost Proposal.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Scope of Work.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3: EVALUATION PROCESS
BASIS OF EVALUATION
The evaluator/evaluation committee will review and evaluate the offers according to the following criteria based on a total number of 500 points
The Offeror Qualifications/Informal Requirement, and Specifications portions of the offer will be evaluated based on the following Scoring Guide or as Pass/Fail as appropriate. The Cost Proposal will be evaluated based on the formula set forth on the following page.
A "fail" for any individual evaluation criterion may result in proposal disqualification at the discretion of the procurement officer.
SCORING GUIDE
In awarding points to the evaluation criteria, the evaluator/evaluation committee will consider the following guidelines:
Superior Response (90-100%): A superior response is a highly comprehensive, excellent reply that meets all of the requirements of the RFP. In addition, the response may cover areas not originally addressed within the RFP and/or include additional information and recommendations that would prove both valuable and beneficial to the department.
Good Response (75-89%): A good response meets all the requirements of the RFP and demonstrates in a clear and concise manner a thorough knowledge and understanding of the project, with no deficiencies noted.
Fair Response (60-74%): A fair response minimally meets most requirements set forth in the RFP.
The offeror demonstrates some ability to comply with guidelines and requirements of the project, but knowledge of the subject matter is limited.
Failed Response (59% or less): A failed response does not meet the requirements set forth in the RFP.
The offeror has not demonstrated sufficient knowledge of the subject matter.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Specifications 60% of points for a possible 300 points
Category eMACS Question Point Value
A. Specifications - Services Question 2.3 200 B. Specifications - Vendor Support Question 2.3 100
Offeror Qualifications / Informal Requirements 10% of points for a possible 100 points Category eMACS Question Point Value
A. References Question 2.1 50 B. Company Profile and Resume Question 2.2 50 C. Provider Licensure Question 2.2 Pass/Fail
Cost Proposal 20% of points for a possible 100 points
A. Cost Proposal Question 3.2 100
Lowest overall cost receives the maximum allotted points. All other proposals receive a percentage of the points available based on their cost relationship to the lowest. Example: Total possible points for cost are 30. Offeror A's cost is $20,000. Offeror B's cost is $30,000. Offeror A would receive 30 points, Offeror B would receive 20 points ($20,000/$30,000) = 67% x 30 points = 20).
Lowest Responsive Offer Total Cost x Number of available points = Award Points This Offeror's Total Cost
Bonus Points 50 points
A. Equal Pay for MT Women Question 1.9 50
| SCORING GUIDE |
| EVALUATION CRITERIA |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .