Attachment 3 - Basis for Award.pdf
PDF 284 KB Posted
- Attached to
- (Amendment 0004) Packing and Crating Services - Maxwell AFB Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA330021Q0013
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment - FA330021Q00130004.pdf | ||
| (Updated 0004) Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA330021Q00130004 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - FA330021Q00130003.pdf | ||
| (Updated 0003) Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA330021Q00130003 SF 30.pdf | ||
| (Updated 0002) Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - FA330021Q00130002.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA330021Q00130002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA330021Q00130001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| (Updated) Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA330021Q0013.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Instructions to Offerors.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PACKING AND CRATING
SOLICITATION #FA330021Q0013
BASIS FOR AWARD
This will be a competitive firm fixed- price acquisition utilizing FAR13, Simplified Acquisition
Procedures. Award will made to the lowest offeror that has an acceptable technical rating. Technical acceptability will be evaluated as acceptable or unacceptable based on Table A-1. Only offers rated technically acceptable will then be ranked by price.
Each offeror's quotation will be evaluated against the following: Part I - Technical and Part II - Price
List/Quote.
The evaluation process for this requirement will be conducted as follows:
PART I - TECHNICAL
The Government will evaluate technical using the ratings described in Table 1 for the following contractor responsibilities below:
Table 1. Technical Ratings and Definitions
Rating Definition
Acceptable
Based on the offeror’s technical quotation, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unacceptable
Based on the offeror’s technical quotation, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
1. The contractor must have the ability to perform and shall provide documentation or plan demonstrating its capability to successfully provide the requirements in the PWS.
2. The contractor must have at least three (3) years experience providing the same or similar services outlined in the PWS.
PART II - PRICE LIST/ QUOTE
The offeror's quote will be evaluated on price based on Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The Government may use any of the following price analysis techniques in accordance with FAR 13.106-3(a) to determine if quotes are fair and reasonable based on competitive quotes, comparison with similar services in a related industry, comparison to an independent Government estimate, or any other reasonable basis.
AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS:
The Government intends to award one Firm-Fixed Price award without discussions with offerors. The
Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.
SUMMARY OF EVALUATIONS:
The Government will evaluate all quotations PART I - Technical & PART II - Price List/Quote for responsiveness. The Government will evaluate all offerors for technical acceptability. Offerors that are rated technically acceptable will then be evaluated based upon price. Award will be made to the lowest price offeror that has an acceptable technical rating.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .