Attachment_3_-_Ace_Servuces_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Lacreek_National_Wildlife_Refuge_Staff_Housei.pdf

1 | P a g e

Asbestos Survey Report

Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge Staff Housing Garage

Vetal, SD 57751

Prepared For:

29746 Bird Road

Martin, SD 57551

ACE SERVICES | P.O. BOX 1912 RAPID CITY, SD 57709

2 | P a g e

November 7, 2022

TO: Mr. Todd Schmidt

29746 Bird Road

Martin, SD 57551

RE: Asbestos Survey Report

Staff Housing Garage

Vetal, SD 57751

Dear Mr. Schmidt, Per your request, ACE Services is pleased to submit the results of an asbestos survey performed on 10-27-2022 at the above referenced site at Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, Vetal, SD. This structure will be scheduled for demolition and is the reason for this inspection

INTRODUCTION

ACE Services conducted an asbestos survey of the building located in Vetal, SD. The survey was conducted on 10-27-

2022 by a State of South Dakota certified asbestos inspector. Interior & exterior building components were surveyed and homogeneous areas of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were visually identified and documented.

Although reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials, additional suspect but un-sampled materials could be located in walls, in voids or in other concealed areas. Suspect ACM samples were collected in general accordance with the sampling protocols outlined in EPA regulation 40 CFR 763 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency

Response Act, AHERA). Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by polarized light microscopy.

FIELD ACTIVITIES

The survey was conducted by Mr. Aaron Cable, a State of South Dakota certified asbestos inspector (certification #

9229). A copy of Mr. Cable’s certificate is attached as Appendix C. The survey was conducted in general accordance with the sample collection protocols established in EPA regulation 40 CFR 763, the Asbestos Hazard Emergency

Response Act (AHERA).

The existing buildings were assessed to identify suspect ACMs, which were then grouped into three categories according to their intended use:

• Surfacing Materials – material that is sprayed on, troweled on, or otherwise applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings and fireproofing materials on structural members, or other material on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes.

• Thermal System Insulation (TSI) – material applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching tanks, ducts, or other interior structural components to prevent heat loss or gain, water condensation, or for other purposes.

• Miscellaneous Materials – interior building materials on structural components, structural members, or fixtures, such as floor and ceiling tiles, but does not include surfacing materials or thermal system insulation.

VISUAL ASSESSMENT

Our survey activities began with visual observation of the interior areas of the buildings to identify homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area consists of building materials that appear similar throughout in terms of color, texture and consideration given to date of application. Interior assessment was conducted throughout visually accessible areas of the buildings. Building materials identified as concrete, glass, wood, masonry, metal or rubber were not considered suspect ACM.

3 | P a g e

PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT

A physical assessment of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the friability and condition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the EPA as a material which can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Friability was assessed by physically touching suspect materials.

SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYTICAL

Based on results of the visual observation, suspect ACMs were collected in general accordance with AHERA sampling protocols. Bulk samples were collected, placed in plastic bags, and labeled with unique identification number. Chain-of-custody forms were completed, signed, dated, and along with the bulk samples transported to ENVIRONMENTAL

HAZARDS SERVICES, LLC in Richmond Virginia for analysis by polarized light microscopy per EPA methodology

EPA/600R-93/116

REGULATORY OVERVIEW

The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and asbestos waste disposal practices. It also requires the identification and classification of existing building materials prior to demolition or renovation activity. Under NESHAP, asbestos-containing building materials are classified as either friable, Category I non-friable or Category II non-friable ACM. Friable materials are those that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure and contain more than 1% asbestos. Category I non-friable ACM includes packing’s, gaskets, resilient floor coverings & associated mastics and asphalt roofing products containing more than

1% asbestos. Category II non-friable ACM are any materials other than Category I materials that contain more than

1% asbestos.

Friable ACM, Category I and Category II non-friable ACM which is in poor condition and has become friable or which will be subjected to drilling, sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading and which could be crushed or pulverized during anticipated renovation or demolition activities are considered regulated ACM (RACM).

FINDINGS

EPA recognizes a material as Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) if an asbestos content of greater than one percent asbestos is detected in a representative sample analyzed by polarized light microscopy.

Laboratory analysis confirmed that asbestos was detected in the following sampled materials:

• Transite Hardboard Siding – Located throughout the exterior of the structure.

Miscellaneous Materials – Non-Friable (18% Chrysotile)

All other sampled materials returned from testing with NO asbestos detected. They are listed below.

• Roofing Materials – Throughout.

Photographs of the sampled materials are included in Appendix B.

FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS

It must be realized that hidden ACMs may be present which may not be exposed or defined without actual demolition.

Any such previously concealed ACMs which are revealed only during the demolition process should be sampled for testing by a licensed inspector and should be removed as necessary prior to resumption of work.

GENERAL

This asbestos survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the sample locale. The results, findings, 4 | P a g e conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are based on conditions observed during our survey of the building. The information contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, for specific application to their project as discussed. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. ACE Services does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made.

The following are made part of and complete this report:

Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Report

Appendix B Photographs

Appendix C Asbestos Certification

We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service to you. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the undersigned at 605-484-9129.

Sincerely, Aaron Cable

ACE Services

P.O Box 1912

Rapid City, SD 57709

5 | P a g e

APPENDIX A

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS

6 | P a g e

7 | P a g e

8 | P a g e

9 | P a g e

APPENDIX B

Photographs Appendix B

10 | P a g e

• Transite Hardboard Siding – Located throughout the exterior of the structure.

Miscellaneous Materials – Non-Friable (18% Chrysotile)

11 | P a g e

All other pictured materials returned from testing with NO asbestos detected.

12 | P a g e

13 | P a g e

14 | P a g e

15 | P a g e

APPENDIX C

ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION

16 | P a g e

17 | P a g e

18 | P a g e