Attachment 2 - YC 1648 QASP.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N3904022Q0216
About this file
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan outlines oversight of a contract for routine overhaul services for Barge YC-1648. The services include towing the barge from Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine to the contractor's facilities, performing overhaul work, and returning the barge. A small business set-aside solicitation was issued on July 13, 2022 seeking firm fixed price proposals due by August 1, 2022 for work to be completed by October 15, 2022. The Naval Sea Systems Command and Portsmouth Naval Shipyard are the contracting parties. Contractor performance will be monitored by a Contracting Officer's Representative for quality, timeliness and responsiveness according to the metrics and methods defined in the plan, including customer feedback and inspections.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N3904022Q0216 AMD 001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Past Performance Report Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 - YC-1648 Specifications.pdf | ||
| N3904022Q0216.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Government Furnished Property.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Past Performance Information Form.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N39040-XX-X-XXXX
Attachment 1
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
YC 1648 OVERHAUL
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a Government developed and applied document used to make sure that systematic quality assurance methods are used in the administration of the Performance Based Service Contract (PBSC) standards included in this contract and in subsequent task orders issued there under. The intent is to ensure that the Contractor performs in accordance with performance metrics set forth in the contract documents, that the Government receives the quality of services called for in the contract and that the Government only pays for the acceptable level of services received.
1. AUTHORITY
Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under FAR 52.212-4(a), Inspection/Acceptance, and FAR 52.212-4(m), Termination for cause, and documentation called for in the contract to be accomplished by the Contracting Officer or his duly authorized representative.
1. SCOPE
The QASP is put in place to provide Government surveillance oversight of the Contractor’s quality control efforts to assure that they are timely, effective and are delivering the results specified in the contract or task order. The QASP is not a part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the Contractor’s Management Plan.
1. GOVERNMENT RESOURCES
The following definitions for Government resources are applicable to this plan:
Contracting Officer - A person duly appointed with the authority to enter into, administer, or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the Government.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)/Alternate Contracting Officer’s Representative (ACOR) - An individual designated in writing by the Contracting Officer to act as his authorized representative to assist in administering a contract. The source and authority for a COR is the Contracting Officer. COR limitations are contained in the written letter of appointment.
1. RESPONSIBILITIES
The Government resources shall have responsibilities for the implementation of this QASP as follows:
Contracting Officer – The Contracting Officer ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the Contracting Officer that assures the Contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under the contract. The Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR/ACOR is responsible for administration of YFN 1204 FY 17 overhaul work, and assures proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance. The COR or ACOR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. Any changes that the Contractor deems may affect contract, price, terms, or conditions shall be referred to the Contracting Officer for action. The COR will serve as the Quality Assurance Evaluator (QAE).
1. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
The below listed methods of surveillance shall be used in the administration of this QASP.
Customer Feedback – Customer feedback may be obtained from random customer complaints. Naval Supply Systems form 1343 will be made available by the COR for the patrons. The COR shall have sole custody of the suggestion box. Customer complaints, to be considered valid, must set forth clearly and in writing the detailed nature of the complaint, must be signed and must be forwarded to the COR. .
Inspections – Each phase of the services rendered under the contract is subject to Government inspection during the Contractor’s operations and after completion of a task. Inspections may be routine functions performed by the COR. Government inspections may be conducted in an unannounced manner by the COR or ACOR. The COR shall maintain a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), a copy of which will be provided to the Contractor. Within three days, the Contractor shall reply in writing to CDR(s) by stating reason(s) for unsatisfactory performance(s) and shall identify the corrective action(s) that will be taken to prevent recurrence(s).
IDENTIFIED QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE ITEMS
The following PBSC items are identified within the Statement of Work presented in Section C of the solicitation and are to be monitored under this QASP.
All deliverables covered by this contract
Measurement/Metric – Quality, Timeliness, and Responsiveness.
Performance Standard – Quality – shall focus on the contractor’s ability to
| satisfactorily meet the customer’s expectations of |
| completed work. How many deficiencies were found or |
| instances of rework were required are the types of things |
| that shall be examined. |
Timeliness – within the times and periods, such as on time delivery of products, status reports, invoicing, contractor’s written response within 3 days of CDR(s), and adherence to schedules shall impact any review of Timeliness.
Responsiveness–shall be concerned with how well the contractor responds to customer concerns and the approach used to resolve problems.
Maximum Error Rate – Quality - 0%
| Timeliness – 0% |
| Responsiveness – 0% |
COR may perform unannounced inspections at any time during the availability.
1. DOCUMENTATION
The COR will, in addition to providing documentation to the Contracting Officer, maintain a complete Quality Assurance file. All such records will be retained for the life of this contract. Information in the Quality Assurance file will be considered when completing the annual Contractors Performance Assessment Reporting Systems report.
1. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A – QASP Matrix
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .