Attachment 2 - PPQ.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
RFP 1605C2-26-R-00002 - YouthBuild Technical Assistance & Coaching Services
Solicitation number
1605C2-26-R-00002
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire (PPQ) used by the Department of Labor to evaluate contractor performance for RFP 1605C2-26-R-00002. The questionnaire is sent to points of contact identified by offerors and must be completed and returned to the Contracting Officer (Delano Talley at Talley.Delano.S@dol.gov) and Contract Specialist (Rose Goodwin at Goodwin.Rose@dol.gov) within 10 days of receipt. The PPQ evaluates past performance on same or similar federal, state, local government, or commercial contracts within NAICS code 541613, using a four-tier rating system: Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, and No Confidence.

The questionnaire contains three main sections. Part I requires the offeror to provide contract identification details including contractor name, address, program identification, contract number, contract type, award date, completion date, nature of work, and total contract value. Part II, completed by the point of contact respondent, evaluates five performance criteria with required written rationales: compliance of products, services, and deliverables to specifications; project management effectiveness including subcontractor control; timeliness of performance; cost forecasting and control effectiveness (for cost reimbursement contracts only); and commitment to customer satisfaction. Part III includes sections for identifying other relevant past efforts and respondent identification information, followed by instructions to return the completed questionnaire to the identified Contracting Officer.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A19-Sol-1605C2-26-R-00002_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - PPQ_V2_4.2.26.docx DOCX document
RFP_1605C2-26-R-00002_3.25.26.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Vendor Questions.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

U.S. Department of Labor Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration & Management (OASAM) Office of the Senior Procurement Executive (OSPE)

March 25, 2026

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) 1605C2-26-R-00002

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The Department of Labor, Office of Acquisition Services, is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFQ. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 541613. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the U.S. Department of Labor, no later than 10 days after receipt of request. Submit your completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officer at Talley.Delano.S@dol.gov and Contract Specialist at Goodwin.Rose@dol.gov.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at Talley.delano.S@dol.gov.

Sincerely, Delano Talley

Delano Talley Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .