Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SAIL RIGGING INSPECTION TRAINING COURSE Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70Z02323QCVC00002
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and a solicitation for sail rigging inspection training course services. The Coast Guard is seeking quotes for contractor training support, including two one-week sail rigging inspection courses for up to 20 students each. Offerors must submit responses by June 15, 2023 to Brenda Taylor's email address. The solicitation will result in a firm fixed-price contract for an initial one-year base period plus four one-year options. Offerors will be evaluated on technical capability, past performance, and price. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by offerors and references to assess performance on criteria like quality, schedule, cost control, and small business utilization. Relevant experience and past performance will be important factors in the award decision.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 70Z02323QCVC000020001.pdf | ||
| 70Z02323QCVC00002 A0001.pdf | ||
| Solicitation 70Z02323QCVC00002_Sail Rigging Inspection Course.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Price Summary.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
70Z02323RCVC00001
ENCLOSURE 3
Past Performance Questionnaire (Complete one form per reference)
Please fill out the following information in regards to the solicitation.
SECTION A – TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
Offeror:
Contract Number:
BPA Number:
Order Number:
_____ Prime or _____ Subcontractor (Check one)
| Dollar Amount: |
| Date Completed: |
| Contract Type: |
| _____ Fixed Price _____ Cost Reimbursement _____ Other (Specify) |
(Check one)
Item/Service Description:
Contract Quantity/Period of Performance:
Customer/Business/Agency Name:
Customer POC (Note: Ensure POC information is valid and current) Name:
Address:
Phone:
E-mail:
SECTION B – TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE GOVERNMENT
The Offeror in Section A provided you as reference for a solicitation they are a party to. Please complete the following.
Evaluation Indicate the contractor’s past performance for each category area and overall by identifying with an “x” of check mark for the most appropriate rating according to the scale shown below. Provide rationale, including specific examples, as appropriate, to support your ratings in the space provided for comments for each category area. If more space is needed, continue your comments in the “Additional Comments” section at the end of this questionnaire.
Use the criteria for each category area in Table 1 in the assessment.
TABLE 1- Category Area
| Rating |
| Description |
| Quality of Service |
| Assessment based on the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards). |
| Schedule |
| Assessment based on the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance). |
| Cost Control |
| Assessment based on the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost. |
***If contract is/was Firm-Fixed Price or Firm-Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment, please mark “Not Applicable”***
| Business Relations |
| Assessment based on the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts. |
| Management of Key Personnel |
| Assessment based on the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel. |
| Utilization of Small Business |
| Assessment based on whether the contractor provided maximum practicable opportunity for Small Business including Women Owned Small Businesses, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Businesses, HUBZone, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business, and 8(a) to participate in contract performance consistent with efficient performance of the contract. Also assessment based on compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to Small Business participation (including FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Businesses and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (when required). |
***If Contractor is a Small Business Concern then mark Not Applicable”***
Use the rating definitions in Table 2 to assess contractor performance where appropriate.
TABLE 2 - PERFORMANCE RATINGS DEFINITIONS
| Rating |
| Description |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Neutral |
| No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance rating. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the Offeror, key personnel, or subcontractors. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. |
Use the ratings in Table 3 to assess contractor performance where appropriate.
TABLE 3 - PERFORMANCE RATINGS
| Category |
| Rating |
1. Quality of Service:
__Exceptional __Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Neutral
| 2. Schedule: |
| __Exceptional |
__Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Neutral
3. Cost Control:
__Exceptional __Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __ Neutral
| 4. Business Relations: |
| __Exceptional |
__Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __ Neutral
| 5. Management of Key Personnel: |
| __Exceptional |
__Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __ Neutral
6. Utilization of Small Business:
__Exceptional __Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Neutral
Additional Comments:
Based on the categorical ratings use the Table 4 to assess contractor’s overall performance.
TABLE 4 – OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
| Overall |
| Rating |
__Exceptional __Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Neutral
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .