Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement.pdf

PDF 542 KB Posted

Attached to
SAIL RIGGING INSPECTION TRAINING COURSE Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70Z02323QCVC00002
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security US Coast Guard

About this file

This performance work statement and solicitation describe requirements for contractor-provided sail rigging inspection training services for the U.S. Coast Guard. The contractor shall conduct two one-week courses per year to train up to 20 students each on inspecting sail rigging on small passenger vessels. The training must cover traditional and modern sail systems, components, materials, inspection procedures, and typical problems. The contractor must provide facilities, student materials, assessments, and certificates of completion. Quotes are due by June 15, 2023 for the base year plus four option years. The award will be made based on technical capability, past performance, and price to provide the required training support services.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SAIL RIGGING INSPECTION TRAINING COURSE, newest first.
File Type Posted
70Z02323QCVC000020001.pdf PDF
70Z02323QCVC00002 A0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Price Summary.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation 70Z02323QCVC00002_Sail Rigging Inspection Course.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PR #: 75110PR230000083

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 1/14

FOR

TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE U.S. COAST GUARD

Sail Vessel Rigging Inspection Course (100439)

1.0 GENERAL

1.1 BACKGROUND

One of the missions of the USCG is to ensure that passenger vessels are sea worthy and meet industry and federal standards for marine safety. The USCG conducts vessel inspections to ensure the safety of passengers, protect the marine environment, and ensure safe navigation of our waterways. The Coast Guard requires the services of a commercial vendor to conduct two

(2) one week (5 business days) courses designed to train USCG Marine Inspection personnel in providing effective and efficient inspection of sail rigging on small passenger vessels. Emphasis shall be placed on the variety of sail vessel rigging systems, methods of problem detection, and examination techniques. The training shall include an overview of typical problems found in past inspections. Each one week, (five business day, 40 hours training session) class shall be attended by twenty (20) students.

1.2 SCOPE

The USCG requires the contractor to provide all administrative and technical support services required to conduct two (2) one-week (five business day) Sail Vessel Rigging Inspection Course (100439). Each convening shall be attended by twenty (20) students.

1.3 OBJECTIVE

To ensure the USCG Marine Inspection workforce can conduct inspections of Sail Vessel Rigging Inspection Course efficiently and effectively to ensure the safety of our maritime community.

1.4 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

1.4.1 Compliance Documents

a. Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) 19-14

1.4.2 Reference Documents

The following documents may be helpful to the Contractor in performing the work described in this document:

a. Coast Guard policy - Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) 2-16.

b. Title 46 of the U.S. Code

c. Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 176 - 178

d. COMDTINSTs 16000.70 – 16000.72

e. COMDTINST M16000.9, Marine Safety Manual, Volume IV – 6.E.3 Special Rules

Pertaining to Specific Vessel Types

f. Marine Safety Center Plan Review Guidlines H1-15 - Review of Rigging Systems for

Sailing Vessels

1.5 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY.

This contract includes a Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) at PWS 9.0. The PRS plays an integral role in the administration of the contract. In addition to any applicable inspection clauses or other related terms and conditions contained in the contract, the PRS must serve as a primary tool for inspection and acceptance of services as facilitated by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). Evaluation of the Contractor’s overall performance

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 2/14

must be in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the PRS, and will be conducted by the COR. The PRS constitutes a material aspect of the contract and will not be changed or otherwise modified without prior written approval of the Contracting Officer.

2.0 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/TASKS

The Contractor shall provide training and related support services for two (2) one-week (five business day) Sail Rigging Inspection Courses (100439). The courses shall be designed to train USCG Marine Inspection Personnel in providing effective and efficient inspection of sail rigging on small passenger vessels. Emphasis shall be placed on the variety of sail vessel rigging systems, methods of problem detection, and examination techniques. The training shall include an overview of typical problems found in past inspections.

2.0.1 The Contractor shall structure each course, to provide one week (5 business days, 40 training hours) of instruction for each course.

2.0.2 Each one week (5 business days, 40 training hours) course should be attended by up to twenty

(20) USCG students. The government will coordinate the course schedule annually with the Contractor at award of each Optional Period. The government will provide at minimum 45 days notification of course schedule change request. The USCG will provide a course roster to the contractor within 30 days of each scheduled course convening.

2.0.3 The Contractor shall structure the course to provide a combination of classroom instruction, field trips, representative vessel inspections, underway training opportunities, lab/workshop, and vessel site visits.

2.0.4 The Contractor shall provide to the USCG for review and approval a Sail Vessel Rigging Inspection Course. The Course curriculum must include the most currently available information regarding sail rigging inspection procedures for USCG inspected small passenger vessels.

Draft course curriculums shall be submitted with Contract proposal. Annual course curriculum updates are required at the award of each Optional Period of Performance. The course should provide training on the technical aspects of sail-rigging, and include the following minimum content:

Design characteristics of sail-rigging Types of sail-rigged vessels, traditional and contemporary All training modules shall cover both traditional and contemporary vessels and rigging systems and equipment Components utilized in sail-rigging systems (masts, spars, booms, cable, rope, terminals, etc.)

Materials used in sail-rigging equipment and characteristics Sails and sail configurations Inspection methods and procedures Evaluation of component/s condition Evaluation of vessel fitness for service Current USCG policy-guidance for inspected sail-rigged vessels Managing deficiencies (CG-835s)

2.1 TRAINING OBJECTIVES:

Training and learning objectives need to provide attendants with sufficient retained knowledge and skills to effectively conduct marine inspections on USCG-inspected (sail-rigged) passenger

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 3/14

vessels. Training scope must address, in detail, both traditionally and contemporarily rigged sailing vessels in all cases.

2.1.1 The Contractor shall provide students with a comprehensive overview of the tasks performed by USCG small passenger vessel inspectors.

2.1.2 The Contractor shall ensure the course addresses the following objectives:

1. Students will have an understanding of the role of the Marine Inspector during an examination of sail rigging.

2. Students will have an understanding of the USCG and industry standards for sail rigging.

3. Students will have an understanding of design considerations and construction techniques for sail rigging.

4. Students will become familiar with and capable of identifying materials used in the repair and construction of sail rigging.

5. Students will develop a thorough understanding of inspection procedures and what to look for during an inspection of sail rigging.

2.2 TERMINAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

2.2.1 Sail Rigging Inspection. The Contractor shall provide performance based training to ensure students are able to inspect sail rigging in accordance with Federal Regulation, Coast Guard Policy, and good marine practice. The training shall include but not be limited to the following Terminal Performance Objectives:

1. Given references and diagrams of sail rigging systems, examine references and diagrams to discern the terminology and location of sail components, types of parts/materials, and specifications acceptable for sail vessels with 100 percent accuracy.

2. Given references, access to various sail vessels, and/or examples of various deficiencies in sail vessels, inspect structural components for deficiencies with 100 percent accuracy.

3. Given references, access to various sail vessels, and/or examples of various repairs made to sail hulled vessels, inspect the repairs for compliance with Coast Guard policy and “good marine practice” with 100 percent accuracy.

4. Given a sail propelled vessel, copies of appropriate Marine Information System Safety and Law Enforcement (MISLE) entries, paper files, personal protective equipment (PPE), tools, a T-Boat Inspection Job Aid (or notebook), a Notice of Merchant Marine Inspection Requirements Form (CG-835) and/or a work list, inspect the exterior and interior surfaces of the vessel for suspect areas of damage, decay, and/or defects with 100 percent accuracy.

5. Given references, the results of a completed exterior/interior inspection, a T-Boat Job Aid, and a sail propelled vessel, complete a detailed inspection of the suspect areas to determine the extent of damage, decay, and/or defects with 100 percent

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 4/14

accuracy.

6. Given a sail propelled vessel, the results from an inspection, and review notes for each suspected area, a Job Aid and a Notice of Merchant Marine Inspection Requirements Form (CG-835) and/or a work list, record areas in need of remediation with 100 percent accuracy.

7. Given references, a repair proposal for remediation from an authorized vessel representative, evaluate the repair proposal for acceptance with 100 percent accuracy.

8. Given a sail propelled vessel with completed remediation repairs and an accepted repair proposal, inspect repairs for acceptance/rejection per accepted repair proposal with 100 percent accuracy.

9. Given a sail propelled vessel, it’s accepted and completed remediation repair/work list or Notice of Merchant Marine Inspection Requirements Form (CG-835), and its T- Boat Job Aid or notebook, inspect the vessel for watertight integrity as part of a dry dock examination with 100 percent accuracy.

10. Given a sail propelled vessel under construction and/or an existing wooden hulled vessel undergoing initial inspection and approved plans, inspect the construction and materials for compliance with approved plans with 100 percent accuracy.

2.3 TRAINING FACILITIES.

The Contractor shall provide a classroom facility of appropriate size with appropriate access to male and female restroom facilities for a class size minimum of twenty (20) students and shall be free from external noise and distractions. The classroom will be outfitted with instructional support equipment necessary to deliver the course material. The Contractor shall be responsible for setting up the training facility, arranging furniture as necessary, laying out participant materials, and preparing equipment and instructor aids.

2.3.1 The Contractor shall provide break periods not to exceed five (5) minutes every training hour. The Contractor may combine two breaks to provide break periods not to exceed ten

(10) minutes every two (2) hours.

2.3.2 The Contractor shall facilitate availability of parking spaces for students with vehicles.

2.4 COURSE EVALUATION

2.4.1 Level 1 Evaluation

The Contractor shall provide a structured student course evaluation questionnaire to be completed by all participants at commencement of the course.

2.4.1.1 The questionnaires shall be directed toward eliciting participants’ comments as to the value of the material taught, recommended changes and/or additions, and the quality of the instructor personnel.

2.4.1.2 The evaluation shall be initially submitted with the project plan and approved by the COR. Any changes to the evaluation shall be approved by the COR.

2.4.1.3 The Contractor shall provide a consolidated report of the Level 1 evaluations with recommendations for course enhancement not later than thirty (30) days to the COR after the end of each course.

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 5/14

2.4.2 Level 2 Evaluation. The Contractor shall provide a learning evaluation (tests) to be completed by all participants and that encompasses the terminal performance objectives of the course curriculum.

2.4.2.1 A level 2 Evaluation will be developed to test the TPOs.

2.4.2.2 The questions must be designed to accurately capture the following:

a. What knowledge students learned.

b. What skills students developed or improved.

2.4.2.3 The evaluation shall be initially submitted with the project plan and approved by the COR. Any changes to the evaluation shall be approved by the COR.

2.4.2.4 The Contractor shall provide a consolidated report of the Level 2 evaluations (test results) with recommendations for course enhancement not later than thirty (30) days to the COR after the end of each course.

2.4.3 Level 3 Evaluation.

The Contractor shall provide a structured evaluation to measure whether the course graduates have performed the terminal performance objectives (TPO) in the workplace. A survey shall be administered to both graduates and their supervisors for each convening not less than six (6), but no more than seven (7) months after each course completion.

2.4.3.1 At a minimum, the level 3 evaluation shall consist of a question for each TPO listed in the course curriculum outline. The question must ask whether the graduate has performed the TPO. It shall include the performance portion of the TPO. The condition and standard portion of the TPO may be included in the level 3 question but are not required.

2.4.3.2 The evaluation shall include a follow-up question for each negative response to the initial TPO question (i.e., If no, then why?)

Survey takers will then choose from five responses. These are:

Lack of skills or knowledge to perform the task Have not had the opportunity to perform the task Someone else performs this task at the unit Unit has different equipment than the graduate was trained on Unit has different procedures that the graduate was trained in

2.4.3.3 The evaluation shall be initially submitted with the project plan and approved by the COR. Any changes to the evaluation shall be approved by the COR.

2.4.3.4 The Contractor shall provide a consolidated report of the Level 3 evaluation responses with recommendations for course enhancement no later than eight (8) months after each course convening to the COR.

2.5 COURSE CERTIFICATES.

The Contractor shall provide each graduate with a certificate attesting to the successful completion of the course. The certificates shall include, at a minimum, the course title, date of completion, statement that the student has successfully completed the course, name and address of training facility, an individual identification number for the certificate, and signatures of the contractor’s Director of Training (or equivalent) and the Contractor’s Instructor.

2.5.1 The Contractor shall provide the certificate to the attendee no later than ten (10) business days after the course ends.

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 6/14

2.5.2 The Contractor shall provide to the COR a consolidated list of the students who successfully completed course no later than ten (10) business days after the course ends.

3.0 CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL

3.1 QUALIFIED PERSONNEL

The Contractor shall provide qualified personnel to perform all requirements specified in this

PWS.

3.1.1 Instructor(s)- Instructors shall have a minimum 15 years of experience with sail-rigged vessels and small passenger sail vessels, or have conducted sail-rigging inspections on behalf of owner/operators, or for the United States Coast Guard and have been an instructor on this or related subjects for a minimum of 4 years. Equivalent level of experience will be accepted for individuals with an advanced degree in Naval Architecture or Marine Engineering or training in similar subject matter. The instructor must be able to impart on the students a basic level of understanding for the following:

The inspection of Traditional Sailing Vessels The inspection of Modern Sailing Vessels The inspection of Standing Rigging The inspection of Running Rigging The inspection of Rigging Components

Proof of current eligibility shall be submitted with all proposals and bids. Any additions to the list of potential instructors must be approved by the COR no fewer than ten (10) days prior to course convening. Instructor(s) must also meet the requirements of a Qualified Instructor as described in Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) 19-14. The name of all instructor(s) and their resumes shall be provided to the Government as part of the Contractor's proposal. Instructor(s) are further designated as Key by the Government (see PWS 3.2).

3.2 KEY PERSONNEL

Before replacing any individual designated as Key by the Government, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer no less than 30 business days in advance, submit written justification for replacement, and provide the name and qualifications of any proposed substitute(s). All proposed substitutes shall possess qualifications equal to or superior to those of the Key person being replaced, unless otherwise approved by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall not replace Key Contractor personnel without approval from the Contracting Officer. The following Contractor personnel are designated as Key for this requirement. Note:

The Government may designate additional Contractor personnel as Key at the time of award.

3.3 PROJECT MANAGER

The Contractor shall provide a Project Manager who shall be responsible for all Contractor work performed under this PWS. The Project Manager shall be a single point of contact for the Contracting Officer and the COR. It is anticipated that the Project Manager shall be one of the senior level employees provided by the Contractor for this work effort. The name of the Project Manager, and the name(s) of any alternate(s) who shall act for the Contractor in the absence of the Project Manager, shall be provided to the Government as part of the Contractor's proposal.

The Project Manager is further designated as Key by the Government. During any absence of the Project Manager, only one alternate shall have full authority to act for the Contractor on all matters relating to work performed under this contract. The Project Manager and all designated alternates shall be able to read, write, speak and understand English. Additionally, the

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 7/14

Contractor shall not replace the Project Manager without prior approval from the Contracting Officer.

3.3.1 The Project Manager shall be available to the COR via telephone between the hours of 0800 and 1700 EST, Monday through Friday, and shall respond to a request for discussion or resolution of technical problems within 24 hours of notification.

4.0 OTHER APPLICABLE CONDITIONS

4.1 SECURITY

Contractor access to classified information is not currently required under this PWS. Under this task order, the Contractor may require access to Sensitive but Unclassified Information (SBU) in performance of tasking.

4.2 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

The period of performance for this contract is a one-year base period with four one-year option periods as follows:

Base Period One Year From Date of Award Option Period One Period to Begin day after the end of Base Period Option Period Two Period to Begin day after end of Period One Option Period Three Period to Begin day after end of Period Two Option Period Four Period to Begin at day after end of Period Three

4.3 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

The primary place of performance will be the Contractor’s facilities.

The Contractor’s facility shall be located no greater than 25 miles from a major port in the Continental United States: Preferred ports include: San Diego, CA, San Francisco, CA, Corpus Christi, TX, Niantic, CT, Baltimore, MD, Tampa, FL and Norfolk, VA.

An alternate location may be used when mutually agreed by both the contractor and the Coast Guard. The request for an alternate location must be submitted in writing by the initiating party.

If an alternate, location is identified Government property, the contractor would not be compensated for costs accrued for the facility.

The Contractor’s facility and any facilities used by the Contractor to provide training to U.S.

Coast Guard personnel shall comply with all applicable OSHA requirements ( 29 CFR Part 1910) and have adequate sanitary facilities (male and female restrooms), lighting for training, and heating and cooling.

4.4 HOURS OF OPERATION

The Contractor shall convene courses between the hours of 0800 and 1600 local time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays).

4.5 TRAVEL

Contractor travel may be required to support this requirement. All travel required by the Government outside the local commuting area(s) will be reimbursed to the Contractor in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulations. The Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining COR approval (electronic mail is acceptable) for all reimbursable travel in advance of each travel event.

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 8/14

4.6 POST AWARD CONFERENCE

The Contractor shall attend a Post Award Conference with the Contracting Officer and the COR no later than 10 business days after the date of award. The purpose of the Post Award Conference, which will be chaired by the Contracting Officer, is to discuss technical and contracting objectives of this contract and review the Contractor's draft project plan. The Post Award Conference will be held at the Government’s facility, located at 2703 Martin Luther King Ave. SE Washington, DC 20593 or via teleconference.

4.7 PROJECT PLAN

The Contractor shall provide a draft Project Plan at the Post Award Conference for Government review and comment. The plan, at a minimum, shall include: (a) list of work to be performed;(b) project schedule; (c) description of intended results; (d) role of key personnel, if applicable and

(e) how quality of service (project) will be maintained throughout life of contract. The Contractor shall provide a final Project Plan to the COR not later than seven (7) business days after the Post Award Conference.

4.8 PROGRESS REPORTS

The Project Manager shall provide a progress report no later than 10 business days after the completion of each course convening to the Contracting Officer, COR, and designated SME via electronic mail. This report shall include a summary of all Contractor work performed, including a breakdown of labor hours by labor category, all direct costs by line item, an assessment of technical progress, schedule status, any travel conducted and any Contractor concerns or recommendations for the previous reporting period.

4.9 PROGRESS MEETINGS

The Project Manager shall be available to meet with the COR upon request to present deliverables, discuss progress, exchange information and resolve emergent technical problems and issues. These meetings shall take place via teleconference.

4.10 GENERAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall provide all written reports in electronic format with read/write capability using applications that are compatible with DHS workstations (Microsoft Office Applications).

4.11 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

All Contractor developed processes, procedures, curriculum, and other forms of intellectual property first developed under this contract shall be considered Government property. All documentation, photography, and electronic data and information collected by the Contractor and entered into or generated in support of this contract shall be considered Government property, and shall be returned to the Government at the end of the performance period.

4.12 PROTECTION OF INFORMATION

Contractor access to information protected under the Privacy Act is required under this PWS.

Contractor employees shall safeguard this information against unauthorized disclosure or dissemination in accordance with the law and Government policy and regulation.

4.13 PROFESSIONAL APPEARANCE.

The Contractor’s employees shall present a professional appearance at all times and their conduct shall not reflect discredit upon the United States, the Department of Homeland Security and the United States Coast Guard. If the Government feels there is a problem with a

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 9/14

Contractor’s appearance; the issue will be brought to the attention of the KO who will report the issue to the Contractor.

4.14 SECTION 508 REQUIREMENTS

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (classified to 29 U.S.C. § 794d) requires that when Federal agencies develop, procure, maintain, or use information and communications technology (ICT), it shall be accessible to people with disabilities. Federal employees and members of the public with disabilities must be afforded access to and use of information and data comparable to that of Federal employees and members of the public without disabilities.

All products, platforms and services delivered as part of this work statement that, by definition, are deemed ICT shall conform to the revised regulatory implementation of Section 508 Standards, which are located at 36 C.F.R. § 1194.1 & Appendixes A, C & D, and available at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=e1c6735e25593339a9db63534259d8ec&mc=true&node=pt36.3.1194&rgn=div5. In the revised regulation, ICT replaced the term electronic and information technology (EIT) used in the original 508 standards. ICT includes IT and other equipment.

Exceptions for this work statement have been determined by DHS and only the exceptions described herein may be applied. Any request for additional exceptions shall be sent to the Contracting Officer and a determination will be made according to DHS Directive 139-05, Office of Accessible Systems and Technology, dated November 12, 2018 and DHS Instruction 139-05- 001, Managing the Accessible Systems and Technology Program, dated November 20, 2018, or any successor publication.

4.14.1 Section 508 Requirements for Technology Services When developing or modifying ICT, the Contractor is required to validate ICT deliverables for conformance to the applicable Section 508 requirements. Validation shall occur on a frequency that ensures Section 508 requirements is evaluated within each iteration and release that contains user interface functionality.

1. When modifying, installing, configuring or integrating commercially available or government-owned ICT, the Contractor shall not reduce the original ICT Item’s level of Section 508 conformance.

2. When developing or modifying electronic documents and forms provided in a Microsoft Office or Adobe PDF format, the Contractor shall demonstrate conformance to the applicable to the applicable Section 508 standards (including WCAG Level A and AA Level 2.0 Success Criteria) by conducting testing using the test methods published under “Accessibility Tests for Documents” at https://www.dhs.gov/compliance-test-processes.

3. When developing or modifying ICT deliverables that contain the ability to automatically generate electronic documents and forms in Microsoft Office and Adobe formats, or when the capability is provided to enable end users to design and author web based electronic content (i.e. surveys, dashboards, charts, data visualizations, etc.), the Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to ensure these outputs conform to the applicable Section 508 standards (including WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA Success Criteria). The Contractor shall demonstrate conformance by conducting testing and reporting test results based on representative sample outputs. For outputs produced as Microsoft Office and Adobe PDF file formats, the Contractor shall use the test methods published under “Accessibility Tests for Documents”, which are published

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 10/14

at https://www.dhs.gov/compliance-test-processes. For outputs produced as web based electronic content, the Contractor shall use the DHS Trusted Tester for Web Methodology Version 5.0, or successor versions. This methodology is published at https://www.dhs.gov/trusted-tester

4. Contractor personnel shall possess the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary to address the accessibility requirements in this work statement.

4.14.2 Section 508 Deliverables

1. Section 508 Test Plans: When developing or modifying ICT pursuant to this contract, the Contractor shall provide a detailed Section 508 Conformance Test Plan. The Test Plan shall describe the scope of components that will be tested, an explanation of the test process that will be used, when testing will be conducted during the project development life cycle, who will conduct the testing, how test results will be reported, and any key assumptions.

2. Section 508 Test Results: When developing or modifying ICT pursuant to this contract, the Contractor shall provide test results in accordance with the Section 508 Requirements for Technology Services provided in this solicitation.

3. Section 508 Accessibility Conformance Reports: For each ICT item offered through this contract (including commercially available products, and solutions consisting of ICT that are developed or modified pursuant to this contract), the Offeror shall provide an Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) to document conformance claims against the applicable Section 508 standards. The ACR shall be based on the Voluntary Product Accessibility Template Version 2.0 508 (or successor versions). The template can be found at https://www.itic.org/policy/accessibility/vpat. Each ACR shall be completed by following all of the instructions provided in the template, including an explanation of the validation method used as a basis for the conformance claims in the report.

4. Other Section 508 Documentation: The following documentation shall be provided upon request for ICT items offered through this contract:

o Documentation of features provided to help achieve accessibility and usability for people with disabilities.

o Documentation on how to configure and install the ICT Item to support accessibility.

o Documentation of core functions that cannot be accessed by persons with disabilities.

o Documentation of remediation plans to address non-conformance to the Section 508 standards

4.15 CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The contractor warrants that to the best of its knowledge and belief, and except as otherwise disclosed, he or she does not have any organizational conflict of interest, which is defined as a situation in which the nature of work under a government contract and a contractor’s organizational, financial, contractual or other interests are such that:

(1) Award of the contract may result in an unfair competitive advantage; or

(2) The contractor’s objectivity in performing the contract work is or might be otherwise impaired.

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 11/14

The contractor agrees that if after award he or she discovers an actual or apparent organizational conflict of interest with respect to this contract, he or she shall make an immediate and full disclosure in writing to the contracting officer which shall include a description of the action which the contractor has taken or intends to take to eliminate or neutralize the conflict. The government may, however, terminate the contract for the convenience of the government if it would be in the best interest of the government.

In the event the contractor was aware of an organizational conflict of interest before the award of this contract and intentionally did not disclose the conflict to the contracting officer, the government may terminate the contract for default.

The provisions of this clause shall be included in all subcontracts and consulting agreement wherein the work to be performed is similar to the service provided to the Government by the prime contractor. The contractor shall include in such subcontracts and consulting agreements any necessary provisions to eliminate or neutralize organizational conflicts of intetest.

4.16 EMPLOYEE CONDUCT.

Contractor’s employees shall comply with all applicable Government regulations, policies and procedures (e.g., fire, safety, sanitation, environmental protection, security, “off limits” areas, wearing of parts of military uniforms, and possession of weapons) when visiting or working at Government facilities. The Contractor shall ensure contractor employees present a professional appearance at all times and that their conduct shall not reflect discredit on the United States, the Department of Homeland Security or the U.S. Coast Guard.

4.17 EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION.

Contractor employees visiting Government facilities shall wear an identification badge that, at minimum, displays the Contractor name, the employee’s photo, name, clearance-level and badge expiration date. Visiting Contractor employees shall comply with all Government escort rules and requirements. All Contractor employees shall identify themselves as Contractors when their status is not readily apparent and display all identification and visitor badges in plain view above the waist at all times.

4.18 REMOVING EMPLOYEES FOR MISCONDUCT OR SECURITY REASONS.

The Government may, at its sole discretion, direct the Contractor to remove any Contractor employee from U.S. Coast Guard facilities for misconduct or security reasons. Removal does not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility to continue providing the services required under any task order awarded under this contract. The Contracting Officer will provide the Contractor with a written explanation to support any request to remove an employee.

5.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED RESOURCES

The Government will provide the following resources necessary to perform the Contractor services, unless specifically stated otherwise in this performance work statement.

5.1. The government will provide copies of the relevant compliance documented cited (PWS 1.4.1) at the Kick-Off meeting.

5.2. The Government may send auditors and/or observers to the facility during course sessions to evaluate the Contractor’s performance in meeting the course objectives and the other requirements of this PWS.

5.3. Class Schedule and Roster. The COR/CG Program Manager will coordinate class schedule(s) and course roster with the Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days prior to each

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 12/14

course convening. Each class will consist of no more than twenty (20) students. Occasionally the USCG may send a program auditor(s) to sit in on the course. These personnel will not be considered students & will not count against the number of course participants.

5.4. The Contractor shall use Government furnished information only for the performance of work under this contract. At the end of contract performance or in the event of termination, the Contractor shall return all GFR to the Government.

6.0 CONTRACTOR FURNISHED PROPERTY

6.1 COURSE PREPARATION. The Contractor shall furnish all facilities, materials, equipment and services necessary to fulfill the requirements of this contract, except for the Government Furnished Resources specified in PWS 5.0.

6.2 STUDENT MATERIAL. The Contractor shall prepare and provide all required student materials (course manuals, workbooks, vessel drawings, handouts, quizzes, tests, completion certificates).

7.0 GOVERNMENT ACCEPTANCE PERIOD

The COR will review deliverables prior to acceptance and provide the contractor with an e-mail that provides documented reasons for non-acceptance. If the deliverable is acceptable, the COR will send an e-mail to the Contractor notifying it that the deliverable has been accepted.

7.1 The COR will have the right to reject or require correction of any deficiencies found in the deliverables that are contrary to the information contained in the Contractor’s accepted proposal. In the event of a rejected deliverable, the Contractor will be notified in writing by the COR of the specific reasons for rejection. The Contractor may have an opportunity to correct the rejected deliverable and return it per delivery instructions.

7.2 The COR will have 30 business days to review deliverables and make comments. The Contractor shall have 30 business days to make corrections and redeliver.

7.3 All other review times and schedules for deliverables shall be agreed upon by the parties based on the final approved Project Plan. The Contractor shall be responsible for timely delivery to Government personnel in the agreed upon review chain, at each stage of the review.

The Contractor shall work with personnel reviewing the deliverables to assure that the established schedule is maintained.

(SECTION 8.0 Begins on next page)

LAST UPDATED: 01/20/2023 PAGE 13/14

8.0 DELIVERABLES

The Contractor shall consider items in BOLD as having mandatory due dates. Items in italics are deliverables or events that must be reviewed and/or approved by the COR prior to proceeding to next deliverable or event in this PWS.

ITEM

PWS

REFERENCE

DELIVERABLE / EVENT DUE BY

DISTRIBUTION

1 4.7 Draft Project Plan Submitted with Proposal

N/A

2 2.1.3 Draft Course Curriculum Submitted with Proposal

COR,

Contracting Officer

3 4.7 Final Contractor Project Plan

Not later than ten (10) business days after Kick-Off Meeting.

COR,

Contracting Officer

4 2.0.4 Final Course Curriculum Not later than ten (10) business days after Kick-Off Meeting.

COR

5 2.0.4 Annual Amended/Updated Course Curriculum

Not later than ten (10) business days after the establishment of the first Task Order of each ordering period.

COR

6 2.5.1 Course Certificates Presented to personnel at the conclusion of each convening.

Students

7 4.8 2.5.2

Progress Reports with consolidated list of students who successfully completed course.

Not later than thirty (30) business days after the conclusion of each course convening.

COR

8 2.4.1.3 2.4.2.4

Consolidated Report of the Evalulations(s) with Recommendations.

Not later than thirty (30) business days after the conclusion of each course convening.

COR

9 2.4.3.4 Consolidated report of the Level 3 Evaluations with Recommendations

Not later than eight (8) months after conclusion of each course convening.

COR

PR #: 75110PR230000039

LAST UPDATED: 1/20/2023 PAGE 14/14

9.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS).

The PRS establishes key elements of Contractor performance that represent “mission essential” service requirements, which are identified in the table below in the “Service Output” column. The “Performance Objective” column represents the standard against which Contractor performance will be measured in relation to accomplishment of the corresponding service output. The performance objective or “standard” describes the minimum acceptable level of service by the Contractor for satisfactory performance. The “Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)” column displays the maximum allowable deviation from the performance objective, which, if exceeded, evokes the negative incentive specified in the table below.

Service Output Performance Objective Acceptable Quality Level

(AQL)

Positive/Negative Incentive

1. Contractor Availability (PWS 3.3.1) Contactor shall ensure the Project Manager is available to the COR via telephone between the hours 0800 and 1700 EST, Monday through Friday Method of Inspection-COR ability to contact the PM to discuss or resolve technical Problems

+/- 100% CPAR rating reflecting good or poor performance could affect decision to exercise Option.

2. Proficient Training Methods (PWS 2.0)

Contractor shall ensure students maintain an 80% or greater pass rate in courses taught and ensure that 100% of the Technical Performance Objectives are covered in the Course Curriculum..

Method of Inspection-COR surveillance through users surveys and Auditor reports.

+/- 100% CPAR rating reflecting good or poor performance could affect decision to exercise Option.

3. Deliverables (PWS 8.0) Contractor shall ensure the timely receipt of all deliverables..

Method of Inspection-COR monitoring receipt of deliverables.

+/- 100% CPAR rating reflecting good or poor performance could affect decision to exercise Option.

4 Contractor Appearance (PWS 4.13) Contractor shall present a professional appearance at all times and conduct shall not reflect discredit upon the US, USCG and DHS.

Method of Inspection-COR surveillance through users surveys and Auditor reports.

+/- 100% CPAR rating reflecting good or poor performance could affect decision to exercise Option.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .