The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
SOURCES SOUGHT & ADVANCE NOTICE
MARKET RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division South Florida Waterfront and Maritime Operations (SFWMO)
SOURCES SOUGHT & ADVANCE NOTICE
MARKET RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division South Florida Waterfront and Maritime Operations (SFWMO)
INDUSTRY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SFWMO REQUIREMENT
Company:
Address:
CAGE Code:
EUID Number:
NAICS Code(s):
Point of Contact (POC):
POC Title:
POC Email address:
The following questions are designed to help the Government make a determination related to socioeconomic / small business opportunities as well as refine/improve current acquisition documents such as the SOW and solicitation.
| Contractor Info / Experience |
| Contractor Response |
| 1 |
| Does your company provide maritime services? |
| 1a |
| If your company does not directly provide maritime services, do you have an industry partner that does? |
| 2 |
| Are the services provided to industry, academia, or government (local, state, federal)? |
| 3 |
| Please specify type of maritime services provided (i.e.: transportation and logistics, shipbuilding and repair, marine vendor, marine safety, environmental, construction, marine professional services, ports harbors and infrastructure, allied industries, other – specify) |
| 4 |
| Does your company carry maritime insurance? |
| 5 |
| Does your company currently have or previously had a government contract performing maritime services? |
| 5a |
| If contract was for industry or academia, please provide contract information, a short description of maritime services provided, and number of years’ experience. |
| 5b |
| For government contracts, please provide: |
Contract Number (w/Task Order # as appropriate):
Description of services performed:
Similarity in scope:
Client POC with email address:
% work self-performed:
| 5c |
| Please add additional government contract information as needed, and designate new table rows as 5c, 5d, 5e, etc. |
Contract Number (w/Task Order # as appropriate):
Description of services performed:
Similarity in scope:
Client POC with email address:
% work self-performed:
| 6 |
| If you have not performed at least 50% of a similar support services contract in the past, how can you demonstrate your capability to meet the requirements of FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting? |
| 7 |
| Are your currently employed personnel capable of performing the work described in the SOW? |
| 8 |
| Does your company employ personnel with secret or higher security clearances? If ultimately required, would you be able to meet this SOW requirement? Please explain. |
| 9 |
| Do your currently employed personnel have the requisite Cyber Security Workforce certifications (as specified in DoD 8570.01-M) to perform the SOW tasks (see attached draft CSWF matrix)? |
| 10 |
| Does your company intend to provide the required support as the prime contractor or as a subcontractor? If prime, what percentage of the work would your company intend to perform? |
| 11 |
| Identify your company’s small business/socioeconomic status, as specified in the System for Award Management (SAM)? |
| 12 |
| Provide a brief description (maximum of four additional pages) identifying your company’s capabilities to perform the required services. Please address your company’s capabilities by referencing specific requirements of the attached draft SOW. |
| 13 |
| Does your company currently have or previously had a government contract performing services in South Florida? |
| 14 |
| The Government is seeking feedback from industry regarding the most appropriate NAICs code for this effort. What NAICs would your business suggest? |
| Acquisition Strategy |
| Contractor Response |
| 1 |
| Is the SOW clear and does it allow the proposal of an appropriate level of effort? If no, which portions are unclear and/or underdeveloped? |
| 2 |
| Are portions of the SOW suitable for firm-fixed pricing? If yes, which portions do you believe are suitable for firm-fixed-price? |
| 3 |
| Comparing the SOW to other Government/Department of Defense (DoD) solicitations, does the NSWCCD SOW appear comprehensive and finely tuned? If no, please provide suggestions (additions, deletions, clarifications, etc.). |
| 4 |
| Are any of the SOW’s specific requirements overly restrictive? |
| 5 |
| Are the requested key personnel sufficient (not too many and not too few) to determine the team representing the best value to the Government? If no, please provide suggestions. |
| 6 |
| Are the provided labor categories too restrictive? If yes, please suggest improvements (reduce key labor categories, add non-key labor categories, etc.). |
| 7 |
| Are the qualifications for the provided labor categories too restrictive? If yes, please provide suggestions. |
| 8 |
| Is your company able to meet the personnel experience requirements as specified? |
| 9 |
| Are there any barriers preventing your company from submitting a proposal? |
Section 3: Corporate Description. Capability Responses must include all of the following information (5 page limit):
(1) A completed Table 1. Table 1 is a listing the percentage of work a respondent can perform with respect to the stated requirements based on the respondent’s capabilities. This is an assessment/ analysis of a respondent’s independent abilities as to what they can or cannot perform – exclusive of any potential subcontractor/team member information. Do not include any documentation or percentages for any company other than your own. For respondents planning to propose a teaming arrangement that complies with the requirements set forth in FAR clause 52.219-27 (Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (Oct 2022), Table 1 must be completed for each of the teaming partners. In this case, additional Table 1 listings may be submitted on additional pages, but those additional pages shall only contain those additional tables – no additional narrative is permitted on these extra pages beyond a one line caption for each table.
Respondents shall fill in Columns B and C of Table 1.
a. The percentages listed in Column A represent the government’s estimated percentage of effort in each technical area that will be required relative to the overall effort of the Task Order.
b. Entries in Column B reflect the percentage work in each technical area that a respondent can accomplish as described above. The values in each of the rows of this column will be between 0 and 100%.
c. Values in Column C represent the percentages of the overall Task Order that the respondent can accomplish in each task area. For each task area, this is determined by multiplying the percentage listed in Column A with the percentage entered in Column B. The sum of the values in Column C represents the percentage of the overall Task Order that the respondent can accomplish. This value cannot exceed 100%.
TABLE 1 – Respondent’s Level of Effort Capability
| Task Area |
| Tasking Description |
(with PWS Paragraph Reference) Column A Percentage of Functional Area Effort in the Overall Task (Gov Est) Column B Respondent’s Projected Level of Effort in each Functional Area Column C Respondent’s Projected Level of Overall Task Effort (Col A) x (Col B)
| 3.1 |
| PROGRAM MANAGEMENT |
| 5% |
| 3.3.1 |
| WEIGHT HANDLING/ LOAD TESTING/ RIGGING |
| 6% |
| 3.3.3 |
| OPERATIONAL READINESS |
| 23% |
| 3.5 |
| INSTRUMENTATION AND TESTING |
| 6% |
| 3.6 |
| OCEAN, MECHANICAL AND ELECTICAL ENGINEERING |
| 13% |
| 3.7 |
| ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT |
| 5% |
Table 1 notes:
1. The Sum of the values in Column C represent the percentage of the task that the respondent can perform as the prime.
