Attachment 2_Industry Day Request for Information Survey.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Low Altitude Stalking and Striking Ordnance - Industry Day Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W91CRB-23-D-LASSO_SS
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground

About this file

This document contains a survey for industry vendors regarding an unmanned aerial system with lethal payload capabilities. The U.S. Army is seeking information on readily available options for rapid experimentation to provide lethal firepower capabilities from the squad to brigade level via unmanned aerial systems. The survey collects information from potential prime vendors on system specifications, capabilities, certifications, production timelines, and pricing for 15 systems. Questions address attributes such as weight, dimensions, endurance, navigation, sensors, transportability, environmental testing, maintenance requirements, roles, technology readiness, and potential DoD contract vehicles. Subcontractor questions focus on areas of expertise, partnerships with prime contractors, and product testing. The related federal contract opportunity indicates the Army Materiel Command will be conducting an industry day for its Low Altitude Stalking and Striking Ordnance program.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Low Altitude Stalking and Striking Ordnance - Industry Day, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 1_LASSO Industry Day Follow-up RFI Questions.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Survey v2 Introduction:

The conflict in Ukraine has clearly demonstrated the ability of unmanned systems at increasingly lower echelons of employment to be highly effective in different roles from intelligence gathering, reconnaissance, and strike actions by both partners and potential near peer adversaries.

The Army is looking to develop knowledge of innovative ways to employ lethal and non-lethal effects delivery capabilities from unmanned aerial systems (UAS) from the Brigade Combat Team to the squad Level. Conflict in the EUCOM Area of Responsibility has demonstrated technology used in new ways by partners and potential near peer adversaries. The US industrial base must be ready to rapidly respond and provide capability forward to US service members.

The Army is interested in exploring a spectrum of kinetic delivery options to include unmanned aerial systems with built-in kinetic capability or those UAS that can be retrofitted with munition carry/release capabilities. The Army is analyzing the loitering munitions (LM) market and adjacent markets to identify readily available options for the purposes of rapid unit-level experimentation in an operational environment. Problem Statement: What is the problem that needs to be solved?

US Soldiers need the fire power capability from the squad to brigade level to employ lethal capability via UAS to increase Soldiers’ safe standoff distance from enemy forces while increasing the general situational awareness that unmanned systems offer our formations. There is likely no single solution to this problem and the Army will need a mixture of capabilities that suit light/SOF and mounted (Stryker/mechanized) formations from the squad to, potentially, the brigade level. The target sets will likely be a mixture of adversary vehicles and troops. This capability must use existing network capability resident within the Army and DoD. Options for control or employment that include pure teleoperation or are inclusive of semi- or fully-autonomous activity for target detection, navigation, and object avoidance are acceptable. Any decision for employment of lethal effects must have a human operator in the loop. The Army also needs the option to field these capabilities to not only US forces but potentially partner nation forces if required.

Survey Questions
#Company InformationVendor 1 (example)
1Company NameAcme Systems Inc
2Name of SystemXR27K
3What is the main expertise of your company?System integrator- loitering munition
4Are you a prime vendor or subcontractor?Prime vendor
#Prime Vendor QuestionsVendor 1 (example)
1What is the AUR Weight?60lbs
2What are the dimensions of the AUR?55" length x 15" diameter
3What is the ISR Weight?20lbs
4What are the dimensions of the ISR?
5What is the Fire Control Station Weight (includes all ancillary equipment needed to operate out to 20km)?30lbs
6Is the controller handheld in size? Provide demensions.Yes. 15"x7"x.5"
7What is the total shipping weight of the system?112lbs
8What are the shipping dimensions of the system?72" Ht x 36"Width x25" Depth
9Is the lethal payload capable of defeating a tank? Warhead/fuze must be internal to airframe.Yes payload has been tested for tank mobility and firepower kills
10What is the munition type and is it certified by US Govt EOD?Javelin, yes.
11Is the fuse board certified and who produces it?Yes, PER
12What is the system's endurance at 20km under favorable conditions?Yes, 20 minutes.
13What is the system's max loitering time?45 min
14Is the launch mechanism either gas generated, compressed air, or battery?Compressed Air
15What is the system's setup time?8 minutes
16What radio does the system use and what is its max range?Silvas, 37.5Km
17Is the FCS data encrypted using NSA approved encryption standard?Yes
18Can the FCS perform handoff, abort, arm/disarm (to include status), and waypoints functionality?Yes
19Can the operator remotely retarget missiles after launch?Yes
20Can the operator be capable of receiving a target hand-off from another controller?Yes
21Can the operator confirm target with the on-board EO/IR sensor?Yes
22Can the operator sustain lock in the terminal phase of engagement?Yes
23Is the flight control on the FCS semi-autonomous with continuous flight when loss of communication is experienced?Yes
24What type of navigation does the AUR utilize (GPS or INS)?GPS
25Is the GPS SAASM or M-Code (preferred) compliant?M-Code
26Is the wing configuration collapsible, man portable.Yes (rotary)
27What type of EO/IR Sensor is mounted/integrated into the AUR?Single axis EO/IR gimbal for day/night operations.
28Is the EO/IR capable of providing target monitoring, target hand-off, system status and mission planning with real-time sensing?Yes
29Is the system fully transportable in field handling and crated configuration?Yes, 2-man lift
30Has any environmental performance testing been conducted on the system?Yes, all environmental testing have been conducted except…
31What are the specific maintenance requirements for your productCharge the battery every 6 months, replace battery after 18 months of non use
32Does your product provide multiple rols capabilitiesYes, modular munitions payload capable of swapping with an ISR enhance camera package
33What is the Technology Readiness Level of the system?TRL 8
34What is the estimated AUR Unit Price for 15 systems? (prime vendors)$66,000
35What is the estimated FCS price for 15 systems? (prime vendors only)$25,000
36What is the production lead time of the system?2 months
37What is the monthly production rate200 per month
38What DoD contract vehicles does your company have that this LASSO program could leverage for production?Contract xxx with US Air Force
39Do you have any International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) or other similar restrictions
#Subcontractor QuestionsVendor 1 (example)
1What is the main expertise of your company?
2Are you partnered with any prime contractor?
3Is your product ready for immediate integration into the LASSO components?
4Has your product already been integrated into a LASSO component?
5What testing and certifications has your product completed?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .