This document contains questions from a federal agency following an industry day event for a Low Altitude Stalking and Striking Ordnance procurement. The agency requests detailed responses on proposed systems and components, technology readiness levels and testing, warhead integration schedules and capabilities, manufacturing and supply chain challenges, performance specifications and schedules, reliability data, and operational workflows under degraded communications. It seeks estimated unit costs, production experience and contacts, and warhead effectiveness under different attack conditions and levels of testing. The related solicitation is for the Low Altitude Stalking and Striking Ordnance program and was an industry day hosted by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Other files attached to Low Altitude Stalking and Striking Ordnance - Industry Day, newest first.
The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
LASSO Industry Day Follow-up RFI Questions
Question
Response
1
What system will be proposed for the Tranche 2/3 Procurement? Describe the Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP) allocation for each subcomponent (launch mechanism, air vehicle, control system computer, radios and antennas, etc.).
2
Describe in detail your justification for your Technology Readiness Level Assessment. Provide details on all the environmental testing used to assess TRL.
3
Provide a detailed warhead integration schedule and test article delivery schedule for fifteen (15) systems with an anti-tank (mobility, firepower) integrated warhead capability.
4
Discuss your technical and supply chain challenged associated with meeting your schedule for Tranche 2/3.
5
What specific Performance Specifications are not achievable by February 2024? If not achievable, is there a plan in place to accomplish the full requirements and when? Provide applicable development and test schedule.
6
Discuss your manufacturing capability and how many systems can be delivered per month.
7
Do you have U.S. DoD production contracts for the proposed or a similar system? If yes, please provide Program Sponsor POC.
8
Provide the estimated Average Unit Product Cost (AUPC) for each system capable of meeting requirements shared during the industry day.
9
Provide reliability data (field, lab, or analysis) for the entire system to successfully complete the mission once commanded.
10
Provide the system operational work flow of the system when the communication link or the satellite navigation link is compromised during the mission.
11
Step thru your CONOP from setup to impact and discuss how the system functions, how ready/effective the system is, and any planned work that is being done to improve it.
12
Under what conditions (angles of attack, locations on a vehicle, armor thickness) is your warhead effective? What testing has been performed for each condition? Describe both standalone warhead testing and warhead-on-platform testing.
File details come from the government source that posted it.
Updated .