Attachment 2 - Evaluation Factors.pdf
PDF 174 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hurst E-draulic Rescue Tools Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA441925Q0027
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Factors attachment for Solicitation FA441925Q0027 for Hurst E-draulic Rescue Tools to be delivered to Ebbing Air National Guard Base in Arkansas. The evaluation will use two primary factors: Price and Technical Acceptability. The total evaluated price will be determined by the total of Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) 0001, 0002, and 0003, and the contracting officer must verify the price is fair and reasonable. Technical evaluation will involve assessing the two lowest-priced quotes against technical requirements, with quotes receiving either an "acceptable" or "unacceptable" rating based on meeting salient physical, functional, and performance characteristics. If only one quote is acceptable, an award will be made to that Small Business concern.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Brand Name Justification Amended_Signed.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation Amended.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation - Fillable Amended.pdf | ||
| Questions and answers.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Brand Name Justification.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation - Fillable.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Instruction to offerors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3. Provision and Clauses.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2 - Evaluation Factors
FA441925Q0027
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES
(Jan 2025)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1. Price
2. Technical Acceptability
(End of provision)
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2:
Most advantageous to the Government is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price. By submission of its quote, the vendor accepts all solicitation requirements, including all technical requirements and terms and conditions.
Failure to conform to solicitation requirements may result in a quote being determined not awardable without further evaluation. The evaluation criteria are detailed below: Factor 1:
Price The total evaluated price will be determined by the total of CLIN's 0001, 0002, and 0003.
Before a contract may be awarded, the contracting officer must determine the price fair and reasonable per FAR 13.106-3. No telephonic responses will be processed. Factor 2: Technical Acceptability The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the vendor’s quoted item meets all of the provided salient characteristics for the required item. The two lowest vendors’ quotes will be evaluated against technical requirements and will be assigned a rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable.” Rating Description: “Acceptable” - Quote clearly meets the items specifications of the solicitation. “Unacceptable” - Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. The quote will be determined technically acceptable if it reflects the salient physical, functional, or performance characteristic specified by the customer. If one or both of the two lowest quotes are determined to be “Unacceptable”, the next lowest quotes will be evaluated. The next lowest quotes will be evaluated until there are two acceptable quotes. If there is only one acceptable quote, an award will be made to that Small Business concern.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .