Attachment 2 Evaluation Criteria.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Automated Chemistry Testing Platform Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8601-21-Q-0093
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Core Lab Layout_Projected (002).pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 Evaluation Criteria-UPDATED.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4-SOW-July 2021.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 DRAFT BPA Document.pdf | ||
| Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
EVALUATION CRITERIA
*REFERENCE THE SOW TO SEE SUB REQUIREMENTS
| OBJECTIVES | Minimum Requirement | Minimum Requirement Rating | JUSTIFICATION FOR RATING: (Vendor must provide narrative to get credit - can attach narrative not to exceed one page per objective) | SUPPORTING INFORMATION LOCATION: Indicate where in the vendors offer the minimum requirement or objective is supported | |
| 1.1.6. The contractor shall provide a fully integrated testing platform solution consisting of 2 identical analyzers capable of performing all tests listed in Section 1.1.1. (No rating assigned) | N/A | Meets | |||
| 1.1.7. The contractor shall provide a comprehensive solution that addresses the reduction, mitigation, or complete elimination of carryover between samples. Please provide mitigation plan in proposal. |
Evaluation: Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory Definitions.
Excellent: Solution is expected to eliminate carryover between samples.
Satisfactory: Solution is expected to reduce or mitigate some carryover between samples.
| Unsatisfactory: Solution was not provided or is not reasonably expected to reduce or mitigate carryover between samples. | Does Not Meet | |
| 1.1.11. Analyzer must have minimal maintenance requirements. Provide a detailed schedule of daily maintenance performed by the user with hands-on times listed. |
Evaluation: Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory Definitions.
Excellent: <10 minutes of hands-on time per day.
Satisfactory: 10-30 minutes of hands-on time per day.
| Unsatisfactory: >30 minutes of hands-on time per day, or list was not provided. | Excellent | |
| 1.1.25. Analyzer should have Authorization to Operate (ATO) on Defense Health Agency (DHA) networks. Provide eMASS number. |
Evaluation: Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory Definitions.
Excellent: Contractor has approved ATO.
Satisfactory: Started process to get an ATO.
Unsatisfactory: ATO process not started.
| Satisfactory | ||
| 1.2.6 Reagents must be ready for use without reconstitution. Provide a list of any reagents that require preparation. | Unsatisfactory | |
| 1.2.14. Must have sufficient onboard reagent stability. Provide a list of any reagents with less than 14 days onboard stability. |
Evaluation: Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory Definitions.
Excellent: 3 or less reagents have onboard stability <14 days.
Satisfactory: 10 or less reagents have onboard stability <14 days.
Unsatisfactory: More than 10 reagents have onboard stability < 14 days, or list was not provided.
1.2.15. Assays must have sufficient calibration stability. Provide a list of calibration stabilities for each assay.
Evaluation: Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory Definitions.
Excellent: >90% of assays have >90 day stability Satisfactory: 50-90% of assays have >90 day stability Unsatisfactory: <50% of assays have >90 day stability, or list was not provided
Completed Excel Pricing Sheet (No rating assigned) N/A
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .