Attachment 2 DOJ AI RFI Capability Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This file is a capability matrix template designed for vendors responding to the Department of Justice's Request for Information (RFI) regarding artificial intelligence-enabled legal research solutions. The matrix serves as a market research instrument, not a scored evaluation tool, and requires vendors to complete detailed responses addressing 45 specific capability requirements across six primary categories: GSA/Commercial Availability, Legal Research, Document Review/Analysis, Legal Drafting/Productivity, Accuracy/AI Governance, and Security/Confidentiality, plus sections on Integration/Implementation, Federal Requirements, and Licensing/Cost.
Vendors must respond with "Yes," "No," "Partial," or "N/A" for each capability item while providing concise supporting information that identifies limitations, dependencies, additional licensing needs, third-party products, and required customization. Key requirements include demonstration of GSA MAS availability under SIN 511210 or applicable alternatives; support for federal case law, statutes, regulations, and natural-language legal research with proper citation and source attribution; document ingestion and analysis capabilities for multiple formats; AI governance controls addressing hallucinations and fabricated citations; security measures protecting confidential attorney work product with logical data segregation; FedRAMP authorization or equivalent compliance; integration capabilities with existing legal workflows; Section 508 accessibility compliance; and defined commercial licensing models with transparent pricing. Vendors must also document their experience serving federal agencies, their status as either original equipment manufacturers or authorized resellers, and all ancillary costs including infrastructure, subscriptions, and professional services required for implementation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 Statement of Objectives.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Vendor Information
| VENDOR INFORMATION |
| Proposed Product |
| OEM |
| Company Name |
| UEI |
| GSA MAS Contract Number |
| Applicable SIN(s) |
| Business Size / Socioeconomic Status |
| FedRAMP Status / Authorization |
| Typical Implementation Timeline |
| Licensing Model |
| ROM Price / Pricing Basis |
| Material Gaps or Exceptions |
| Industry Recommendations |
AI Capability Matrix
| ATTACHMENT 1 – LEGAL AI CAPABILITY MATRIX | ||||
| Instructions: Select Yes, No, Partial, or N/A for each item. Provide concise supporting information and identify limitations, dependencies, additional licensing, third-party products, or customization. This matrix is for market research and is not a scored evaluation. | ||||
| # | Category | Capability / Requirement | Response | Vendor Response / Explanation |
| 1 | GSA / Commercial Availability | Solution is currently available through GSA MAS SIN 511210 or another applicable MAS SIN. | Provide MAS contract number, SIN(s), and awarded product name. | |
| 2 | GSA / Commercial Availability | Proposed solution is an existing commercial legal technology product rather than a Government-specific development effort. | Describe any customization or development required. | |
| 3 | GSA / Commercial Availability | Respondent is the OEM or an authorized reseller/partner for the proposed solution. | Identify OEM and relationship. | |
| 4 | Legal Research | Solution supports research of federal case law. | Describe coverage and source libraries. | |
| 5 | Legal Research | Solution supports research of federal statutes, regulations, and other primary legal authorities. | Identify authorities and jurisdictions covered. | |
| 6 | Legal Research | Solution supports natural-language legal research and question answering. | Describe functionality and limitations. | |
| 7 | Legal Research | Solution provides citations or links to the underlying legal authorities supporting generated answers. | Describe citation/source functionality. | |
| 8 | Legal Research | Solution supports citation validation or treatment/history analysis comparable to traditional legal citators. | Describe validation methodology and coverage. | |
| 9 | Legal Research | Users can verify AI-generated propositions against authoritative source material within the solution. | Describe verification workflow. | |
| 10 | Document Review / Analysis | Solution can ingest and analyze legal documents uploaded by authorized Government users. | Identify supported formats, size limits, and restrictions. | |
| 11 | Document Review / Analysis | Solution can summarize pleadings, briefs, opinions, memoranda, contracts, discovery materials, or other legal documents. | Describe supported document types. | |
| 12 | Document Review / Analysis | Solution can compare multiple documents and identify differences, themes, issues, facts, or relationships. | Describe functionality and limits. | |
| 13 | Document Review / Analysis | Solution can extract key facts, dates, parties, legal issues, obligations, or other structured information from documents. | Describe extraction capabilities. | |
| 14 | Document Review / Analysis | Solution supports analysis across a collection or repository of documents rather than one document at a time. | Describe corpus/repository capabilities and limits. | |
| 15 | Legal Drafting / Productivity | Solution assists attorneys with drafting legal memoranda, briefs, correspondence, outlines, or other professional work products. | Describe drafting capabilities. | |
| 16 | Legal Drafting / Productivity | Solution can summarize and synthesize legal authorities into draft analysis while preserving source attribution. | Describe safeguards and source attribution. | |
| 17 | Legal Drafting / Productivity | Solution supports editing, rewriting, proofreading, or improving attorney-generated content. | Describe functionality. | |
| 18 | Legal Drafting / Productivity | Solution supports attorney-created templates, prompts, workflows, or reusable legal work products. | Describe customization available to administrators/users. | |
| 19 | Accuracy / AI Governance | Vendor provides controls or documentation addressing hallucinations, fabricated citations, or unsupported legal conclusions. | Describe safeguards and testing. | |
| 20 | Accuracy / AI Governance | Solution clearly distinguishes generated content from authoritative legal source material. | Describe user-facing controls. | |
| 21 | Accuracy / AI Governance | Vendor can identify the underlying AI/model provider(s) used by the solution. | Identify provider/model(s) as appropriate. | |
| 22 | Accuracy / AI Governance | Government administrators can establish restrictions governing approved AI features, data sources, users, and use cases. | Describe administrative governance. | |
| 23 | Accuracy / AI Governance | Vendor provides notice of material changes to underlying models, data-handling practices, or AI functionality. | Describe change-management process. | |
| 24 | Security / Confidentiality | Government prompts, documents, and other Government-provided information are not used to train public/shared AI models. | Explain data-use and model-training policy. | |
| 25 | Security / Confidentiality | Government data is logically segregated from other customers' data. | Describe segregation controls. | |
| 26 | Security / Confidentiality | Solution provides protections appropriate for confidential, privileged, attorney work-product, or sensitive legal information. | Describe technical and contractual protections. | |
| 27 | Security / Confidentiality | Vendor can identify where Government data is hosted, processed, and stored. | Identify hosting environment and geographic location. | |
| 28 | Security / Confidentiality | Government data can be retained and deleted in accordance with Government requirements. | Describe retention/deletion controls. | |
| 29 | Security / Confidentiality | Solution provides administrative controls, audit logs, and user activity monitoring. | Describe available logs and reporting. | |
| 30 | Security / Confidentiality | Solution supports SSO/MFA and Government identity-management capabilities. | Identify supported standards/integrations. | |
| 31 | Security / Confidentiality | Solution has a current FedRAMP authorization or operates within an applicable FedRAMP-authorized environment, if required. | Identify status, authorization level, and package details. | |
| 32 | Integration / Implementation | Solution provides APIs or other integration capabilities for authorized Government systems. | Identify APIs and integration methods. | |
| 33 | Integration / Implementation | Solution can integrate with document repositories, case-management systems, knowledge bases, or other legal workflows. | Identify existing integrations and dependencies. | |
| 34 | Integration / Implementation | Solution can be deployed without significant custom software development. | Identify implementation dependencies. | |
| 35 | Integration / Implementation | Vendor can support a limited Government pilot or sandbox prior to broader deployment. | Describe pilot approach, duration, and prerequisites. | |
| 36 | Integration / Implementation | Vendor can provide implementation, onboarding, administrator, and end-user training support. | Describe services and typical timeline. | |
| 37 | Federal Requirements | Solution supports applicable Section 508 accessibility requirements. | Provide VPAT/ACR or other supporting documentation. | |
| 38 | Federal Requirements | Vendor has experience providing the proposed legal AI solution to federal agencies or comparable public-sector organizations. | Provide representative experience; do not include sensitive customer information. | |
| 39 | Federal Requirements | Vendor can support applicable federal records-management and information-governance requirements. | Describe capabilities and limitations. | |
| 40 | Licensing / Cost | Solution is available under a defined commercial licensing model. | Identify named-user, enterprise, consumption, token/API, or other structure. | |
| 41 | Licensing / Cost | Vendor can provide ROM pricing for Government planning purposes. | Provide pricing basis, assumptions, and quantities. | |
| 42 | Licensing / Cost | Volume, enterprise, or tiered discounts are available. | Describe discount structure. | |
| 43 | Licensing / Cost | Vendor can identify all additional licenses, data subscriptions, third-party products, infrastructure, or professional services required. | Identify all dependencies and additional cost elements. | |
| 44 | Licensing / Cost | Vendor can provide mechanisms to monitor or control usage-based/consumption costs, if applicable. | Describe alerts, caps, dashboards, or controls. | |
| 45 | Overall Capability | Proposed commercial solution can substantially satisfy the Government's legal research, document review, and attorney-productivity needs as described. | Identify material gaps, exceptions, or recommended requirement changes. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .