Attachment 12 Past Performance Questionnare.pdf

* PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE *

MEMORANDUM FOR WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

FROM: 20th Contracting Squadron/PKA 321 Cullen St.

SHAW AFB SC 29152-5105

Subject: Request for Performance Information, Solicitation# FA480323QB065, Packing and Crating Services

1. One of the integral considerations in proposal evaluations is the verification of the offeror's past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. This effort, solicitation number FA480323QB065 is for Packing and Crating Services for Shaw AFB, SC.

We depend upon information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of their pe1formance. Therefore, we request that the attached questionnaire be completed concerning the offeror's present/past performance.

2. Our areas of interest are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. You are urged to submit your comments on similar programs for which your activity has contracts or administers contracts with the offeror. Any additional information that you think would benefit Shaw AFB, SC in our evaluation of the offeror's proposals would be appreciated. Please note we may contact the offeror on problem areas or concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken.

3. Due to time constraints, it is imperative that the questionnaire be completed and returned by 2:00 PM EST on 21 December 2023 to:

20th Contracting Squadron/PKA Attn: Ms. Shaunannette Watson 321 Cullen St.

Shaw AFB SC 29152-5105

Mark documents “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY”

Completed questionnaires may be mailed to shaunannette.watson@us.af.mil.

If additional information is required, please contact, Ms. Nancy Hunt at (803) 895-5349, or SSgt Jason Hibbs at jason.hibbs@us.af.mil or (803)895-9802.

JASON S. HIBBS

Contracting Officer

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA480323QB065

Packing and Crating Services

1. Please complete this questionnaire. The following is an explanation of the evaluation codes:

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY

RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA480320RA001

Base Telecommunication System (BTS)

Evaluation please complete the following:

A. Contractor:

B. Subcontractor:

C. Contract number:

D. Total annual contract dollar amount:

E. Period of Performance: From: To:

F. Description of services being performed:

1. How well did management work to resolve problems encountered throughout the performance of the contract?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

2. How well did the contractor demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

3. How well did the home office participate in solving significant local problems?

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

4. How well did they contractor provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

5. How well did the contractor comply with all regulations and guidelines?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

6. How effective was the contractor’s quality control program?

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

7. Did the contractor correct deficiencies in a timely manner in accordance with their quality control procedures?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

8. Based on your judgement of the contractor’s performance, would you award the contractor another contract?

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

9. Did management personnel have sufficient experience to accomplish the requirements of the contract?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

10. Please rate the contractor’s demonstrated ability on this contract in each of the following service areas (if applicable). “Satisfactory” needs no further explanation; however, if possible please provide a short explanatory narrative for performance deemed Unknown Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence.

a. Did contractor exhibit ability to identify and correct non-compliance issues or internal concerns (i.e.

management, personnel, scheduling, and quality issues)?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

b. The contractor prevents unacceptable performance?

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

c. During the course of the contract, was notification sent to the contractor identifying unsatisfactory work: [ ] Yes [ ] No

d. If answered, was immediate action taken by the contractor to correct the situation? [ ] Yes [ ] No

e. How well did contractor meet required deadlines?

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

f. How well did contractor respond to contract changes?

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Please check “yes” or “no” to the following questions:

11. Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, a suspension of payment, or had a claim denied?

Respondent(s) to questionnaire

A. Name(s):

B. Phone Number(s):

C. Position/Duty Title:

Name of reviewer (print):

Location:

Telephone Number: