Attachment 1 - SS and RFI Worksheet for Vendor Responses_SDA_C2.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- A039071
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) Worksheet related to a draft Performance Work Statement (PWS) for the Space Domain Awareness (SDA) / Command and Control (C2) Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Support Services requirement. The RFI worksheet poses a series of questions to potential vendors regarding their interest, qualifications, risk assessment, recommended evaluation factors, performance metrics, and other considerations for this upcoming federal contract opportunity.
The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for Space Domain Awareness / Command & Control, Operations & Maintenance Support, solicitation number A039071, issued by the Department of the Air Force Space Command. The requirement involves providing on-site, 24x7, Top Secret / Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) support services for the 19th Space Defense Squadron's Mission Processing System, Common Framework Environment, Astrodynamics Support Workstation, and Non-Traditional Data Pre-Processor. Responses to the RFI worksheet will help shape the final solicitation requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - RFI Worksheet_SDA_C2_CONSOLIDATED Q and A.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SDA_C2_RFI CONSOLIDATED Q and A.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Combined SS and RFI_SDA_C2 Reacquisition.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - DRAFT SDA C2 Re-Acq PWS .docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions
| SDA/C2 REACQUISITION SOURCES SOUGHT & REQUEST FOR INFORMATION | |
| Company | |
| Business Size / Economic Status | |
| Unique Entity Identification Number | |
| Cage Code | |
| Point of Contact Name, Email and Phone Number | |
| In reference to the DRAFT Performance Work Statement (PWS), please answer the questions below. In addition, comments on the DRAFT PWS are being accepted on the second worksheet in this workbook. | |
| Question | Response |
| 1. Do you intend to compete for inclusion consideration in this requirement? | |
| 2. How many years of experience does your company have supporting the requirements outlined in the DRAFT PWS as a PRIME CONTRACTOR and/or SUBCONTRACTOR? Please differentiate the years of experience in your answer between being a PRIME and SUBCONTRACTOR. | |
| 3. What actions and incentives have you implemented to incentivize, recruit, and retain employees? What outcomes did your company and your supported customer(s) realize from your approach? | |
| 4. What risk areas do you foresee with this requirement for the Government? | |
| 5. What risk areas do you foresee for a contractor to meet the Government's requirements? | |
| 6. What organizational conflicts of interest do you foresee if your company were selected for this requirement? Please explain. | |
| 7. Which evaluation factors and source selection approach do you recommend the Government consider for inclusion? Please explain. | |
| 8. What would you consider to be key critical performance measurements and minimum standards to be met as part of the SDA/C2 requirement? | |
| 9. Are the Service Summary performance thresholds included in the draft SDA/C2 PWS achievable? Do you recommend any changes to the performance objectives or thresholds that will be used to conduct Government evaluation of contractor performance and contractor quality control? | |
| 10. How much proposal preparation time do you anticipate needing to assemble a proposal for this requirement? | |
| 11. What would you consider to be key critical performance measurements and minimum standards to be met for a vendor to be considered? | |
| 12. Please identify any industry standards that exist for performance metrics for this type effort. What performance objectives could be beneficial to incentivize for both the contractor and Government to retain personnel or improve performance? | |
| 13. Would you recommend inclusion of incentives for this requirement? Why or why not? If incentives were included, what types of incentives would you recommend and against which parts of the PWS would you recommend aligning them to? | |
| 14. Are you currently providing the requirements outlined in the DRAFT PWS? If so, are you providing these services as an issued order from an existing Government-wide Acquisition Contract (GWAC), General Services Administration contract vehicle, or another existing Government Contract Vehicle? If so, please specify the contract and order number by its respective Procurement Instrument Identifying Number (PIIN). | |
| 15. Which labor categories would you recommend are needed to fulfill the requirements listed in the DRAFT PWS? | |
| 16. Which certifications would you recommend each labor category needs to have at a minimum to meet the requirements of the DRAFT PWS? | |
| 17. What education level(s) would you recommend for each respective identified labor category is needed to meet the requirements of the DRAFT PWS? | |
| 18. Please provide any other recommendations for the Government to consider for this requirement. |
Page &P of &N
PWS Comments
| After reviewing the Draft PWS, please suggest any recommended changes, if any, the Government should consider to increase clarity, achievability, or allow for a more performance-based requirement. Please identify any areas of the PWS which are too restrictive or prohibit the flexibility to perform according to your established practices. Please provide proposed language updates by noting the PWS paragraph along with your feedback below. | |
| PWS Paragraph Reference | Questions/Comment/Suggestion |
&"-,Bold"Market Research - GEODSS RFI No. 3
&A Page &P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .