Attachment_1_-_Request_for_Qualifications.pdf

Request for Qualifications CMAR

Airfield Maintenance Facility

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

FOR

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK

SERVICES FOR A

AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE FACILITY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

RESPONSES MUST BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY TO:

OPENGOV

https://procurement.opengov.com/

STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE

NOVEMBER 19, 2026

2:00 PM PACIFIC STANDARD TIME

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

A. Eligibility to Submit a Response

B. Overview for Submitting a Response

C. Questions and Communications

D. Addenda

E. County’s right to withdraw, cancel, suspend and/or modify RFQ

F. SOQs will not be returned

II. Project Overview

A. Project Description

III. Preliminary Screening Requirements

A. Optional Pre-Proposal Conference

B. Screening Questionnaire

C. Scoring Questionnaire

IV. Statement of Qualification Requirements

A. SOQ Format and Content

B. Required Content for Statement of Qualifications

V. Submission Instructions

A. Submission

B. Authority to Verify Respondent’s Information

C. Alteration/Modifications to Response

D. Withdrawal of Response

E. Ownership and Disposition of Documents Submitted

VI. Evaluation and Selection Process

A. Review and Selection Process

VII. Recommendation for Approval and Selection

A. Final Approval and CMAR Validation Process

B. Disposition and Ownership of Response Documents

VIII. Appendices

Appendix A: Initial Screening Questionnaire (Pass/Fail)

Appendix B: Scoring Questionnaire

Appendix C: Acknowledging Receipt of All Addenda

Appendix D: Affidavit Indicating Degree of Acceptance of the Sample

Contract

Appendix E: CMAR Fee Proposal and Instructions

IX. Attachments

Attachment 1: Projected RFQ Timeline

Attachment 2: Pre-Proposal Conference Location Map

Attachment 3: Sample Contract

I. Introduction

The County of Sacramento (County) owns and operates the Sacramento

International Airport (SMF) through the Department of Airports

(Department). SMF is a commercial service airport located 12 miles from downtown Sacramento. SMF opened in 1967 under its previous name, the

Sacramento Metropolitan Airport, and in the 1990s it was renamed

Sacramento International Airport (Airport). Currently, SMF is best known as the gateway between Northern California destinations and major cities across the United States and the world.

The proposed Airfield Maintenance (AFMX) Facility project (Project) will consist of a new, approximately 20,000 square foot pre-engineered steel structure that will provide a modern, durable, and cost-effective solution to house maintenance equipment, vehicles, materials, and administrative functions in support of airfield operations in a single location at SMF. The proposed new building will be able to accommodate AFMX needs and estimated future growth.

The Department invites all qualified Construction Manager At Risk (CMAR) firms interested in providing their services described in this Request for

Qualifications (RFQ) to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) in compliance with the requirements stated herein.

A. Eligibility to Submit a Response

Respondents that intend to submit an SOQ must meet the following minimum requirements:

• Ability to provide adequate bonds and insurance commensurate with the work to be performed

• Hold a Class B or higher California Contractors License which is current, valid, and in good standing with the California Contractors

State License Board

• Be registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations and qualified to perform public works as required by California Labor

Code sections 1771.5 and 1725.5

• Have delivered projects using the CMAR delivery method or other delivery methods that require Guaranteed Maximum Prices (GMP) and managed work through GMP contracts

• Ability to deliver similar projects within performance period and budget

• Have experience working with government agencies and with public works projects, including applicable public contracting and labor compliance requirements

In addition, experience in the following areas is desired:

• Working in secure public areas

• Working in an operational setting that interacts with the public

• Experience with complex equipment replacement projects

B. Overview for Submitting a Response

The review and selection process will consist of the process described herein to determine the responsiveness of all SOQs received to the requirements set forth in this RFQ and to determine the CMAR providing the best value to the County.

Firms and entities meeting the minimum eligibility requirements set forth in

Sections I.A, III, and IV of this RFQ and interested in providing CMAR services for the Project are invited to submit an SOQ. Respondents should read this entire RFQ and meet all requirements described herein. SOQs that are deemed incomplete or are submitted past the due date and time shall be rejected. All required forms in the appendices must be completed and signed. Any SOQ not containing the information required by this RFQ will be rejected.

While attendance is not mandatory, all prospective CMARs are strongly encouraged to participate in the Pre-proposal Conference described in this document.

C. Questions and Communications

Questions concerning this RFQ must be submitted in the project Q&A section in OpenGov Procurement by the date and time stated in the RFQ timeline set forth in this document.

Questions received via phone or e-mail will not be considered nor responded

to. The County shall respond only to questions properly submitted as described above via addenda.

It is the responsibility of the Respondent to monitor the website for all information related to this RFQ.

D. Addenda

The County reserves the right to modify this RFQ at any time prior to the

SOQ due date. The County will modify the RFQ only by written addenda.

SOQs should be based on this RFQ document and any formal written addenda issued thereafter by the Department. Respondents should not rely on oral statements. Addenda will be posted in OpenGov Procurement. It is the responsibility of each prospective respondent to ensure receipt of all addenda.

E. County’s right to withdraw, cancel, suspend and/or modify RFQ

The County reserves the right to withdraw, cancel, suspend, and/or modify this RFQ for any reason and at any time with no liability to any prospective respondent for any costs or expenses incurred in connection with the RFQ or otherwise.

F. SOQs will not be returned

Upon submission, SOQs will not be returned.

II. Project Overview

The current AFMX facilities are in three different buildings and trailers, including a 4-wide portable trailer unit that is over 26 years old. It is necessary to consolidate the AFMX workspaces into one facility to improve work efficiency to centralized workflow, eliminate redundant utility expenses, staffing overhead, and equipment. The change will help with management oversight, scheduling, reducing downtime and increasing quality control.

The current facilities are undersized for the current AFMX staff, notwithstanding future staffing needs, limiting operational efficiency and safety. This presents several challenges and requires a proactive approach to ensure that AFMX operations can keep pace with SMF aircraft operations growth.

A. Project Description

This Project involves the planning, design, procurement, and construction of a new AFMX building. Based on the initial programming effort, the

Department has identified the desired components and functions of the facility, which are anticipated to include, but are not limited to, the following:

• A pre-engineered steel structure of approximately 20,000 square feet

• Three (3) equipment and vehicle storage bays

• Maintenance work areas

• Administrative and support offices, including restrooms and break areas

• Sweeper dump station, emulsion cleanout area in an accessory structure of approximately 3,000 square feet

• A concrete raised loading dock above grade

• Parking for thirty-two (32) staff/county vehicle parking spaces and two (2) ADA parking spaces

• Utilities connections (power, water, sewer, communication, etc.)

• HVAC, lighting, and fire suppression systems

• Building Site and Delta Road preparation, grading, drainage, paving, and landscaping and irrigation

• To achieve LEED Silver certification, meet specific prerequisites and earn points across various categories such as energy efficiency, water conservation, indoor environmental quality, and sustainable site development

• Compliance with all local, state, and federal codes and FAA requirements

• Signage scope for the building, including both exterior and interior signages

• Modification of the Aircraft Operations Area (AOA) fence and install a new gate

The Office of Planning and Environmental Review (PER) evaluated the

Project and issued an “Addendum to Original Sacramento International Airport (SMF) Master Plan Update Final Supplemental Environmental Impact

Report” for the SMF Airfield Maintenance Facility project on August 7, 2007, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Sections 15000 et seq of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

However, a successful respondent will be required to comply with applicable mitigation measures. See Attachment 3, Exhibit G.

Schematic Site Plan

Schematic Floor Plan - Airfield Maintenance Facility

Schematic floor plan Sweeper dump station, emulsion cleanout area

Rendering Southwest View

Rendering Northwest View

Rendering Southeast View

III. Preliminary Screening Requirements

A. Optional Pre-Proposal Conference

The Department strongly encourages interested respondents to attend the

Pre-Proposal Conference although attendance is not mandatory.

The Pre-Proposal Conference will be held at 6705 Lindbergh Dr., Sacramento, CA, 95837 (Map included in Attachment 2). For the date, please refer to Attachment 1, Projected RFQ Timeline, or the date as amended by Addendum. The purpose of this conference is to review the RFQ package, schedule of events, evaluation process, submission requirements, and forms to be completed.

Additionally, County staff and the Project team will be available to answer questions regarding the RFQ, scope of work, and other related matters.

Information received at the Pre-Proposal Conference may aid prospective respondents in deciding whether to submit an SOQ. The Pre-Proposal

Conference may also provide a forum for networking with other entities that may be interested in collaborating on an SOQ. Questions asked during the

Pre-Proposal Conference may be answered informally; however, all questions for which a prospective CMAR desires a written response from the

Department must be submitted in writing. Written responses will be provided via Addenda. For the last day to submit questions, please refer to

Attachment 1, Projected RFQ Timeline (or the deadline as amended by

Addendum). The Pre-Proposal Conference will be held in person.

B. Screening Questionnaire

Appendix A contains the Initial Screening Questionnaire that a prospective

CMAR must pass to continue with the RFQ process. The County may request proof or additional documentation in support of answers provided to any screening question(s). This Questionnaire is a pass or fail qualifier; if any question results in a “not eligible” response, the SOQ submitted by that prospective CMAR will be removed from further consideration.

C. Scoring Questionnaire

Appendix B contains a Scoring Questionnaire intended to provide the

Department with detailed information about the prospective CMAR. It is recommended that CMARs review the scoring questions early in the process to ensure any detailed information required is included. Depending on the answers given, additional information or explanations may be required by the Department.

A completed Scoring Questionnaire and all relevant detailed responses must be included in the SOQ responses.

IV. Statement of Qualification Requirements

The SOQ must demonstrate the prospective CMAR’s qualifications, be concise, and be well organized. Responses from prospective CMARs shall comply with the following requirements for formatting, forms, content, and supplemental materials in accordance with the instructions below. SOQs may be considered non-responsive, and the prospective CMAR may be disqualified from further consideration if the instructions are not followed.

A. SOQ Format and Content

The SOQ portion described in Section IV.B below should not exceed a maximum of eighty (80) single-sided pages. This page count shall not include the cover letter, resumes, fee schedules, appendices, and other attachments which provide supplemental information that lends context to the SOQ but does not substantively respond to it directly.

Responses must adhere to the following format:

1. Cover Letter

a. A statement that the SOQ is effective for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) days or the date the contract takes effect, whichever is later;

b. A statement confirming that the respondent has reviewed and agrees to be bound by County’s standard contract set forth in Appendix E, including insurance provisions; or, alternatively, a statement confirming that the respondent has reviewed and agrees to be bound by the County’s standard contract, excluding only those provisions that have been redlined for negotiation purposes and are included in their SOQ; and

c. A statement that the respondent does not have an actual or perceived conflict of interest regarding this RFQ or in the submission of their SOQ, or alternatively a statement explaining any conflict of interest and how to avoid, mitigate or neutralize the conflict.

2. Statement of Qualifications

SOQs must contain the following information (and in the same order as listed below):

a. Brief profile of the respondent, including the size, organizational structure and history.

b. Statement that includes:

• A description of the firm’s qualifications for performing the requested scope of work. Clearly indicate your specialized expertise and experience.

• Identify qualifications for any subcontractors that will be performing services.

c. Schedule for the scope of work and a plan showing phasing

d. Names of key personnel that will be assigned to this project.

e. Narrative of the respondent’s experience in implementing similar services and scope of work for other clients, preferably governmental clients.

f. Three (3) references for whom the respondent has provided services similar to those described in this RFQ. The County reserves the right to check other references not provided by the respondent. The following information is required for each reference.

• Customer name and address.

• Point of contact (name, telephone number, email) for contractual/administrative matters and technical performance

• Time of contract

• Brief description of work performed

3. Experience of the CMAR

Provide a listing of the three (3) most recently completed projects where the CMAR has participated as the prime contractor. Preference should be given to example projects similar in size, scope and delivery method as described in this RFQ. For each project listing, provide as much of the following information that is available:

• Project name, location, owner and contact information

• Project architect name and contact information

• If working as a subcontractor, the project general/prime contractor and contact information

• Summary of the work

• Planned completion date and actual completion date

• Initial contract value (bid amount) and final contract value (bid plus added costs) and explain any differences

• Whether the project was delivered as a CMAR or similar project delivery method

• Similarities to the project scope of work

• The role, if any, of members of your currently proposed Staff that were involved on the project

• Any value-added services that were provided on the project

B. Required Content for Statement of Qualifications

1. CMAR’s Approach to the Project

This portion of the SOQ must be limited to (20) single-sided pages.

a. Pre-Construction Phase Approach:

A narrative explaining how the CMAR will use its management team to perform the pre-construction services, which include, but are not limited to, estimating, schedule development, reporting, site logistics planning, design review, detection of coordination and constructability issues, bid/award of subcontracts, preparation and submission of GMP proposals. Include a description of the CMAR’s past experience performing similar pre-construction services by using specific examples involving the staff proposed for this project.

b. Overview of the Processes to Control the Work:

Provide a description of proposed project meetings during the preconstruction and construction phases of the project. Include both management and field meetings.

c. Construction Management Approach:

• A narrative description of CMAR’s proposed construction management approach for this project through progressive

GMPs. Discuss the CMAR’s ability to prepare progressive GMPs and meet achievable construction schedule for the construction project. Discuss methods for management of sequencing, long-lead, float, and critical path elements of the schedule. Include discussion on schedule management procedures and specific methods for successful mitigation of delays to project completion.

• Discuss the CMAR’s ability to manage costs and stay within budget on comparable projects. Identify and address potential construction issues related to the design and sequencing during the design phase.

• Discuss the CMAR’s ability to ensure construction quality control.

Provide specific control measures, means and methods, and staffing requirements for this project. The CMAR shall demonstrate its ability and will respond quickly when there is a construction related issue identified by the Department that is negatively affecting and has the potential to negatively affect operations.

2. Screening Questionnaire

Provide the completed Screening Questionnaire provided in this document described in Section III.B above.

3. Scoring Questionnaire

Provide the completed Scoring Questionnaire described in Section III.C above. Where the answer requires explanation and/or supporting documentation, provide this information on the following pages, and include a signature of an authorized representative of the prospective

CMAR attesting that the above-mentioned statements are true to the best of their knowledge.

4. Acknowledge receipt of all addenda

Per Appendix C, provide a signed affidavit acknowledging receipt of all addenda issued by the County.

5. Acceptance of the Sample Contract

Per Appendix D, a sample contract is attached to this RFQ.

Within this portion of SOQ, the prospective CMAR shall indicate that the terms and conditions described in the Sample Contract appear acceptable. Areas of concern with the Sample Contract should be identified, if applicable. If there are requested revisions to the Sample

Contract, these matters must be clearly detailed in the SOQ.

V. Submission Instructions

The following documents are to be included in this section of the RFQ.

A. Submission

The SOQ documentation must be assembled as one printable, searchable, and bookmarked PDF document. With the sole exception of screenshots taken from the project drawings provided with this RFQ, the SOQ must not include screen captured content. All content within the SOQ must be original, natively rendered, text, schedule, charts, diagrams, tables, or high-resolution graphic files. Screen-captured content other than the exceptions stated here is strictly prohibited and may result in disqualification.

Responses must be received by the date and time outlined in Attachment 1, Projected RFQ Timeline, or as amended by Addendum. Only SOQs uploaded to the SacCounty Ebids (OpenGov procurement/ProcureNow) website will be accepted.

B. Authority to Verify Respondent’s Information

The prospective CMAR agrees that by submitting an SOQ the County is authorized to verify all claimed information stated therein and any references named in their SOQ document. If a prospective CMAR wishes to claim an exception to any information requested in the RFQ, the proposer must detail the nature of the exception in writing at the time of the package submittal. The County will review the exception and decide based upon the information provided.

C. Alteration/Modifications to Response

Responses to all components of this RFQ must be complete when submitted.

There will be no changes, modifications, corrections, or additions made to an

RFQ once submitted to the County. A prospective CMAR may withdraw its

RFQ submission in its entirety and submit a revised or updated SOQ prior to the RFQ response submission due date and time.

D. Withdrawal of Response

Prior to the deadline for submission, an SOQ may be withdrawn by submission of a written request signed by the Respondent’s Proposal

Manager.

Respondent wishing to withdraw their SOQs should reach out to the Point of

Contact listed on the SacCountyEbids (OpenGov Procurement/ProcureNow) website for further.

E. Ownership and Disposition of Documents Submitted

All materials submitted in response to this RFQ will become the property of the County and, as such, are subject to the California Public Records Act

(Government Code sections 7920.000 through 7931.000).

The County will treat all information submitted in an SOQ as available for public inspection once negotiations with the selected Respondent have been completed. If a Respondent believes protected data is included in its SOQ, the Respondent shall clearly identify the data and provide the legal basis in support of the asserted classification. Respondents must present such information separately as part of its proposal OR type in bold red letters the term “CONFIDENTIAL” on that specific part or page of the SOQ which

Respondent believes to be confidential. Classification of data as trade secret data will be determined pursuant to applicable law, and, accordingly, merely labeling data as “trade secret” or labeling every page “CONFIDENTIAL” does not necessarily make the data protected as such under any applicable law.

In order for the County to assert the confidentiality of any such information in the event a California Public Records Act request is received, the

Respondent must request, execute and submit a County-prepared written agreement to defend and indemnify the County for any liability, costs and expenses incurred in asserting such confidentiality.

The final determination of whether the County will assert a Respondent’s claim of confidentiality shall be at the sole discretion of the County. Any information determined to be non-confidential shall be considered a public record. If the County determines that the Respondent’s information does not meet the criteria for confidentiality, the Respondent will be notified of the

County’s intent to release the public record in response to a California Public

Records Act request received by the County.

The Respondent agrees, as a condition of submitting its SOQ, that the

County will not, as between the parties, be liable or accountable for any loss or damage, which may result from a breach of confidentiality related to the

SOQ. The Respondent agrees to indemnify and hold the County, its officials, agents, and employees harmless from all claims arising out of, resulting from, or in any manner attributable to any violation of any provision of the

California Public Records Act, including legal fees and disbursements paid or incurred to enforce this provision

VI. Evaluation and Selection Process

A. Review and Selection Process

The review and selection process consists of two (2) steps to determine the responsiveness of all SOQs received and select the best value CMAR for recommendation to the BOS for approval and contract award.

I. Step 1 – Statement of Qualifications (Scoring and Evaluation)

The Department will evaluate the SOQs based on the rating and scoring information outlined in this Section. Each respondent submitting a responsive SOQ will be scored and ranked.

SOQs not including the required documentation and forms as specified in this RFQ will be considered non-responsive and will not be forwarded to the Selection Committee for consideration. The SOQ that has an Initial

Screening Questionnaire response resulting in a “not eligible” answer will not be forwarded to the Selection Committee for consideration.

If the SOQ meets all RFQ requirements, then the SOQ will be submitted to the Department’s Selection Committee for evaluation and review.

SOQs will be scored based on the thoroughness and inclusiveness of information requested in the RFQ. It is critical for prospective CMARs to provide clear, concise, and complete information in the narrative text of the SOQ that is consistent with other information, such as forms, contained in the SOQ. Each criterion shall have the following maximum point values:

II. Step 2 – Interviews

Upon completion of this review, the Selection Committee reserves the right to invite a short list of the top ranked Respondents for an interview.

It is anticipated that the three (3) top-ranked respondents will be interviewed although the Department reserves the right to invite more or fewer firms to interview. Please refer to Attachment 1, Projected RFQ

Timeline, for information about the projected timeframe for interviews, if conducted. Interviews will consist of a presentation by the Respondent followed by a question-and-answer discussion session. The presentation shall not be used to fill in missing or incomplete information that was required in the SOQ. No new information shall be presented by any

Respondent. An interview invitation letter will be provided by the

Department and identify items for discussion during the interview presentation. Date, time, location, required personnel, allotted time for the interviews, and equipment available to the Respondent for the presentation shall also be provided in the interview letter. Only key personnel listed by the Respondent in its SOQ shall participate in the interview. Respondents will be evaluated based on their presentation and responses to questions and a single score will be established.

CMAR Fee Proposal Sealed Envelope: Each prospective CMAR invited to an interview will be required to provide a separate sealed envelope which includes the completed CMAR Fee Proposal form, as set forth in Appendix E.

Each CMAR Fee Proposal shall include the Fee Percentage to be applied to the Direct Cost of Work plus General Conditions for the Final GMP (GMP

Criteria Point Value

Section 1: Adherence to RFQ Submission Requirements / Instructions (Pass / Fail) 0

Section 2: Project Team 25

Section 3: Communication & Collaboration

• Phasing Plan

Section 4: Construction Plan

• Safety

• Schedule

• Quality

• Cost Control

• Commissioning & Closeout

Maximum total 100 proposals will be developed during the Preconstruction Phase of the Project).

In addition, the supervisory and management staff labor rates that will be provided by the CMAR must also to be included on the CMAR Proposal Form for both the Preconstruction Phase Proposal and the GMP Proposal

(Construction Services Phase).

This estimated budget for the Direct Cost of Work plus General Conditions and Hours has been developed by the Department and is included in

Appendix E. The estimated budget will be used to determine the Lowest Cost

Fee Proposal. The actual hours to be included in the Preconstruction Phase

Proposal will be prepared and developed during negotiation phase of the

Preconstruction Proposal. The actual hours for the progressive GMP will be developed during the Preconstruction Phase services and negotiated between the CMAR and the Department prior to the Construction Services

Phase.

• Bid Detail: Each prospective CMAR shall submit bid detail for three (3) bidders for the scope of work outlined in Section II. If the CMAR cannot obtain three (3) bidders, proof of good faith efforts to meet

RFQ requirements shall be included in the submission. A good faith effort means the CMAR made every reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions of the three-bidder requirement.

• GMP(s): Each prospective CMAR shall also submit their General

Conditions, General Requirements, Contingencies, and Allowances as a

GMP for this scope of work.

Sealed envelopes must be delivered prior to the CMAR interview with the

Department. Any prospective CMAR that does not present their sealed envelopes at check-in prior to the interview shall be deemed non-responsive, and the County Review Panel may decline to move forward with the interview.

At the conclusion of each prospective CMAR’s interviews, the interview performance will be evaluated by the Selection Committee based on the following scoring system:

Criteria Point Value

Section 1: Presentation 50

Section 2: Interview 50

Maximum total 100

At the conclusion of the prospective CMAR interviews, the County will add scores from steps 1 and 2. The top-ranked prospective CMAR will be notified and have its sealed envelope containing their CMAR Fee Proposal Form opened. Selection will be based on the overall evaluation of the interview performance and other criteria identified in this solicitation. Upon successful negotiation of said contract, the Department will recommend the selected

CMAR to the County Board of Supervisors (County Board) for selection and

Project award. In the event the County determines that negotiations with the selected CMAR are unsuccessful, the County shall notify the prospective

CMAR with the second highest combined score and begin negotiations with that firm. The County shall have no obligation to accept any fee proposal, or components thereof, prior to completing negotiations.

VII. Recommendation for Approval and Selection

A. Final Approval and CMAR Validation Process

The County reserves the right to choose or reject any and all SOQs and to further modify, at its sole and absolute discretion, any specific deadlines, timelines, instructions, or requirements contained in this RFQ. SOQs containing omissions, erasures, alterations, conditions, or additions not called for in this RFQ may be rejected. The County reserves the right to waive minor irregularities in any proposal received from a prospective CMAR and to make an award pursuant to this RFQ in the best interest of the

County.

B. Disposition and Ownership of Response Documents

The County will treat all information submitted in SOQs as available for public inspection once negotiations with the selected party are concluded. If copies of SOQs are anticipated to be included with Board materials, the

County will make such documents available for public inspection once staff have made a recommendation for the award.

If a prospective CMAR believes protected data is included in its SOQ, the prospective CMAR shall clearly identify the data and provide the legal basis in support of the asserted classification. Prospective CMARs must present such claimed protected information separately as part of its SOQ, OR type in bold red letters the term “CONFIDENTIAL” on that specific part or page of the SOQ which prospective CMAR believes to be confidential. Classification of data as trade secret data will be determined pursuant to applicable law, and, accordingly, merely labeling data as “trade secret” does not necessarily make the data protected as such under any applicable law.

In order for the County to assert the confidentiality of any such information in the event a Public Records Act request is received, the prospective CMAR must request, execute and submit a County-prepared written agreement to defend and indemnify the County for any liability, costs and expenses incurred in asserting such confidentiality.

The final determination of whether the County will assert a prospective

CMAR’s claim of confidentiality shall be at the sole discretion of the County.

Any information determined to be non-confidential shall be considered a public record. If the County determines that the Respondent’s information does not meet the criteria for confidentiality, the prospective CMAR will be notified of the County’s intent to release the public record pursuant to any

Public Records Act request.

The prospective CMAR agrees, as a condition of submitting its SOQ, that the

County will not, as between the parties, be liable or accountable for any loss or damage, which may result from a breach of confidentiality related to the

SOQ. The prospective CMAR agrees to indemnify and hold the County, its officials, agents, and employees harmless from all claims arising out of, resulting from, or in any manner attributable to any violation of any provision of the California Public Records Act, including legal fees and disbursements paid or incurred to enforce this provision.

End of Section VII

VIII. Appendices

Appendix A: Initial Screening Questionnaire (Pass/Fail)

Provide a clear check mark or “X” on either “yes” or “no” answers to all the following screening questions. If any one answered question results in a “not eligible” answer, the CMAR will not be able to continue with the application process. Passing questionnaires must be included in the SOQ.

1. Does the Firm currently have a worker’s compensation policy as required by California Law?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, continue to the next question.

☐ No - If this answer is chosen, the Firm is not eligible to continue with the application.

2. Does the Firm currently hold all contractors’ license(s) necessary to perform the work described and have all of the necessary licenses been consistently active for at least five (5) years without revocation or suspension?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, continue to the next question.

☐ No - If this answer is chosen, the Firm is not eligible to continue

3. Has the Firm, or an associated firm, been found non-responsible, debarred, disqualified, forbidden or otherwise prohibited from performing work and/or bidding on work for any public agency within

California within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, the Firm is not eligible to continue

☐ No - If this answer is chosen, continue to the next question.

4. Has the Firm, or an associated firm, defaulted on a contract or been terminated for cause by any public agency on any project within

California within the past five (5) years and if challenged, has that default or termination been upheld by a court or an arbitrator?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, the Firm is not eligible to continue

5. Has the Firm or an associated firm or any of their owners or officers been convicted of a crime under federal, state or local law within the past ten (10) years involving:

a. Bidding for, awarding of, or performance of a contract with a public entity,

b. Making false claim(s) to any public entity, or

c. Fraud, theft, or other act of dishonesty to any contracting party?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, the Firm is not eligible to continue

6. Relating to construction activities of the Firm or an associated firm within the past five (5) years, has a performance bond surety for the

Firm or the performance bond surety for an associated firm had to:

a. Take over or complete a project,

b. Supervise the work of a project, or

c. Pay amounts to third parties?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, the Firm is not eligible to continue with the application.

☐ No - If this answer is chosen, the Firm has passed the screening questionnaire.

End of Appendix A

Appendix B: Scoring Questionnaire

Provide a clear check mark or “X” on either “yes” or “no” answers to all the following scoring questions. Where the answer selected is “yes,” provide an explanation with the question number reference on a separate page. Provide a non-black ink signature of an authorized representative following the last explanation. If an answer is not clear, it could be deemed nonresponsive.

1. Has the Firm paid liquidated damages pursuant to a contract for a project with either a public or private owner within the last five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, provide project name(s), damage(s), and date(s) when occurred.

☐ No

2. Has the Firm paid a premium of more than one percent (1%) for a performance and payment bond on any project(s) within the last five

(5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, provide project name(s), damage(s),

3. Has any insurer had to pay amounts to third parties that were in any related to the Firm’s construction activities within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, provide project name(s), damage(s),

4. Has any insurer, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the insurance policy for the Firm in the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, describe the insurance type, the year and basis of the refusal.

5. Has the Firm’s worker’s compensation Experience Modification Rate

(EMR) exceeded 1.0 at any time for the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, provide the EMR(s) and the application dates.

6. Has there been a period when the Firm had employees but was without workers’ compensation insurance or state-approved self-insurance within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, explain the reason(s) for not having insurance and the date(s).

7. Has the Firm declared bankruptcy or been placed in receivership within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, describe the bankruptcy type, recovery plan and date(s).

8. Has the Firm been denied bond coverage by a surety company, or has there been a period of time when the Firm had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, provide details on denied coverage and the name of surety which denied coverage, and the period(s) during which no surety bonds were in place.

9. Has a project owner filed claim(s) as defined by California Code, Public

Contract Code 9204 claims, items subject to formal dispute resolution processes, in an amount exceeding $50,000 against the Firm, or has the Firm filed claim(s) in an amount exceeding $50,000 against a project owner in the past (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, describe the project name(s), claim(s) and the date(s).

10. Has your Firm been cited and/or assessed penalties by the

Environmental Protection Agency, any air quality management district, any regional water quality control board, or any other environmental agency or local conservation commissions within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, provide project name(s), claim(s), and the date(s).

11. Has CAL OSHA and/or federal Occupational Safety and Health

Administration cited and assessed penalties against your Firm, including and “serious”, “willful” or “repeat” violations of safety or health regulations within the last five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, provide project name(s), violation(s), and date(s). If the citation was appealed and a decision was issued, state the case number and the decision date.

12. Has the Firm or an associated firm been cited and/or assessed any penalties for non-compliance with state and/or federal laws and/or regulations, including public bidding requirements and Labor Code violations, within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, indicate the project name(s), violation(s), and date(s) of citation(s) and/or assessment(s).

13. Has the Firm been cited for violations of the Contractor’s State

License Law (Business and Professional Code § 7000 et. seq.), excluding alleged violations of federal or state law including the payment of wages, benefits, apprenticeships requirements, or personal income tax withholding, within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, provide project owner name, the nature of the violation(s), and date(s) when citations occurred.

14. Has the Firm been required to pay either back wages or penalties for its failure to comply with California’s prevailing wage laws, with

California’s apprenticeship law or regulations, or with federal Davis-

Bacon prevailing wage laws within the past five (5) years?

☐ Yes - If this answer is chosen, describe the project name(s), the nature of the violation(s), the name and owner of the projects, the number of employees who were initially underpaid and the amount of back wages and penalties that the Firm was required to pay.

End of Appendix B

Appendix C: Acknowledging Receipt of All Addenda

Follow submission instructions V.

The Affidavit shall be one page written on the respondent’s letterhead to include the following:

• The legal name of the Firm along with address, telephone number, email address.

• A statement indicating acknowledgement of receipt of all addenda issued for the RFQ process

• The date of the latest addendum is received by the Firm.

• Name, title and signature in non-black ink of the person authorized to sign on behalf of the Firm.

Appendix D: Affidavit Indicating Degree of Acceptance of the Sample

Contract

A Sample Contract is attached to this RFQ as Attachment 3. Within this portion of the response the Firm shall indicate that the terms and conditions described in the Sample Contract are acceptable. Areas of concern with the

Sample Contract should be identified, if applicable. If there are proposed additions, deletions, or revisions to the terms in the Sample Contract, these matters must be described in the SOQs and be clearly identified as exceptions to the Sample Contract. The County reserves the right, but has no obligation, to consider said exceptions during contract negotiations with the selected Firm.

The Affidavit shall be one page written on the respondent’s letterhead to include the following:

• The legal name of the Firm along with address, telephone number, email address.

• A statement indicating degree of acceptance of the Sample Contract

• The date of the latest addendum is received by the Firm.

• Name, title and signature in non-black ink of the person authorized to sign on behalf of the Firm.

End of Appendix D

Appendix E: CMAR Fee Proposal and Instructions

SACRAMENTO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Construction Manager At-Risk (CMAR) FEE PROPOSAL FORM

THIS FORM SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN A SEPARATE SEALED ENVELOPE

AT THE TIME OF INTERVIEW. ENVELOPE WILL BE OPENED AFTER

THE INTERVIEW SCORING IS COMPLETE. SEALED ENVELOPES WILL

BE RETURNED TO EACH CMAR NOT SELECTED AFTER THE

INTERVIEW.

The following project parameters will be the basis to determine the CMAR cost component.

Construction Budget $18,000,000 Range ($17,500,000 –

$18,500,000)

Preconstruction Duration

9 months Range 9 – 10 months

Construction Phases 2 phases Range 2 – 3 phases

Construction Duration 12 months Range 12 – 18 months

In determining the CMAR Fee Proposal, the County will evaluate the total fee for CMAR Services by adding the:

a. CMAR Preconstruction Phase Staff Costs

b. CMAR Construction Phase Staff Costs

c. CMAR Construction Phase Services Fee

The Total Fee (for evaluation purposes only) will be the lump sum cost based on (a) + (b) + (c).

(a) and (b) will be determined by filling in the proposed labor rates in chart

(a) and chart (b). These rates are all inclusive, staff rates that will be allowed to be billed during the project (no more than 40 hours per week).

For comparison purposes only, the form has included hours for the positions.

The actual hours that will be included will be developed during the preparation and negotiation of the Preconstruction Services Agreement and in the Final Guaranteed Maximum Price. The allowable billable labor rates will be no greater than the rates listed in this proposal.

The Construction Phase Services Fee will be the percentage multiplied by the actual Direct Cost of Work plus General Conditions for the CMAR. For evaluation purposes only, the Direct Cost of Work plus General Conditions will utilize $18,000,000. The Fee percentage only applies to the Construction

Phase GMP. No Fee Markup is allowable on the Preconstruction Phase

Proposal.

Proposal Form:

(a) CMAR Preconstruction Phase Staff Costs: We propose the following

Billable Hourly Staff Rates to provide the work through the Preconstruction

Phase of the Project. These rates are all inclusive.

*Evaluation Purposes Only

(b) CMAR Construction Phase Staff Costs: We propose the following Billable

Hourly Staff Rate to provide the work for the Construction Phase of the

Project. These rates are all-inclusive.

Contractor’s Position Name *Hours With burden & fee x raw Billable Rate

Total

CMAR Preconstruction

Manager

1,560 $ $

CMAR Senior Estimator 780 $ $

Project Superintendent

1,560 $ $

(a) Total Preconstruction

Staff Cost Component

3,900 $ $

Contractor’s Position Name *Hours Billable Rate *Total

Project Executive 624 $ $

Senior Project Manager 2,080 $ $

Project Superintendent 2,080 $ $

Assistant

Superintendent

2,080 $ $

Project Engineer 2,080 $ $

QC Manager 2,080 $ $

Senior Scheduler 2,080 $ $

*Evaluation Purposes Only

c) CMAR Service Fee Percentage: We propose a Fee% to be applied to the

Construction Phase Direct Cost of Work plus General Conditions as follows:

*Evaluation Purposes Only

Total for (a) + (b) + (c) = $________________________________

Note: Only the fee percentage and hourly rates are being locked in for preparation of progressive GMPs.

ACCEPTANCE

This offer shall be open to acceptance and is irrevocable for one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of SOQ submittal.

CERTIFICATION

The Undersigned hereby certifies that he/she represents the Firm, has authority to sign on behalf of the

Firm, understands the scope of work, has read the documents in its entirety including Exhibits, and that the information submitted has been carefully reviewed and is submitted as correct and final. If selected, Firm further certifies and agrees to furnish any or all services in accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein; to willfully enter into negotiations;

and to faithfully execute an agreement with the County upon successful negotiations.

Accountant 1,560 $ $

Safety Manager 624 $ $

Administrative Assistant 2,080 $ $

(b) Total Construction Staff Cost Component

17,368

CMAR Service Fee

Percentage

*Direct Cost of Work Plus General

Conditions (For Evaluation

Purposes Only)

*Total

CMAR Fee

____________% $XXX,XXX.00 $

The individual signing this RFQ certifies that he/she is a legal agent of the

Firm, authorized to submit on behalf of the Firm, and is legally responsible for the decisions as to the supporting documentation provided.

PROPOSAL FORM SIGNATURE

FIRM: ________________________________________

SIGNED: ________________________________________

PRINTED NAME: ________________________________________

TITLE: ________________________________________

DATE: ________________________________________

End of Appendix E

IX. Attachments

Attachment 1: Projected RFQ Timeline

The Department anticipates the following dates as Project milestones leading to Preconstruction Services Contract award. This schedule is subject to revision by the future Addenda.

The Department requests that teams reserve availability for the dates indicated from 8:00 am-5:00 pm, in the event the Department conducts interviews. Detailed invites to follow if the interviews are scheduled.

Any dates and times listed throughout the document are approximate and are subject to change. The Department reserves the right to modify, at its sole and absolute discretion, this schedule and any specific deadlines, including the successful CMAR’s construction start date.

End of Attachment 1

RFQ TIMELINE Date / Time

BOS Approval for CMAR RFQ Advertising 08.25.2026

Advertise/Release RFQ 09.10.2026

Optional Pre-Proposal Conference 09.29.2026

All Final Questions due by 5:00 pm PST 10.27.2026

Final Answered Questions posted, by 5:00 pm PST 11.13.2026

Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) due by 2:00 pm PST 12.01.2026

RFQ SOQ Review Period 12.02.2026 – 12.17.2026

Interview Reservations (Tentative) 01.18.2027 – 01.22.2027

Tentative date to Send Notifications of Intent to Award 5:00 p.m. PST

02.03.2027

Projected Board of Supervisors Approval of the

Selection of a CMAR 03.2027

Projected Preconstruction Services Notice to Proceed

The Department requests that teams reserve availability the week indicated from 8:00 am-5:00 pm, in the event the Department conducts interviews. Detailed invites to follow if the interviews are scheduled.

Any dates and times listed throughout the document are approximate and are subject to change. The Department reserves the right to modify, at its sole and absolute discretion, this schedule and any specific deadlines, including the successful CMAR’s construction start date.

04.2027

Attachment 2: Pre-Proposal Conference Location Map

End of Attachment 2

Attachment 3: Sample Contract

SAMPLE CONTRACT

Contract No. XXXX

SMF AFMX Facility Project Agreement For CMAR Services Page 1

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT-RISK SERVICES

SACRAMENTO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on , by and between the County of Sacramento, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY,” and [Firm name and entity type] hereinafter referred to as

“CMAR”. COUNTY and CMAR may be individually referred herein as “Party” and collectively referred to herein as “Parties.”

RECITALS

WHEREAS, California Public Contract Code section 20146 authorizes COUNTY, with approval of its Board of Supervisors, to utilize construction manager-at-risk construction contracts for the erection, construction, alteration, repair or improvement of certain County-owned infrastructure projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000); and

WHEREAS, COUNTY intends to use the construction manager at-risk project delivery method for the “Sacramento International Airport Airfield Maintenance Facility” Project

(“Project”) at Sacramento International Airport (“Airport”); and

WHEREAS, COUNTY has conducted a competitive qualifications-based selection process to procure, on the basis of best value, construction manager at-risk (CMAR) services for the Project and has determined that CMAR possesses the necessary experience, personnel, financial strength, and safety record to furnish said services at the price guaranteed by CMAR in this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, CMAR is capable of providing the services sought by COUNTY; and

WHEREAS, COUNTY and CMAR desire to enter into this Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual…