Attachment 1_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

ATTACHMENT 1: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offerors Sending Reference Questionnaire Forms:

Section A shall be completed by the Offeror (the firm requesting the reference) prior to issuing the questionnaires to references. The Offeror shall send the questionnaires for relevant projects that are in progress or completed in the past five (5) years to the individuals who will provide the reference. For Government contracts, send to the Contracting Officer or Technical Representative. For commercial references, send to personnel with similar duties to those for Government contracts. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to follow-up and encourage references to submit the questionnaire. The completed questionnaire shall be submitted via email directly from the person providing the reference.

Instructions to Person Providing Reference:

In order to assess potential vendors under Solicitation No. BAA-NOAA-GPD-2023 – Ground Processing Demonstrations (GPD) Broad Agency Announcement (BAA), the Department of Commerce (DOC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Acquisition and Grants Office (AGO), Satellite and Information Acquisition Division (SIAD) is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. As a reference for work performed by the firm identified in Section A of this questionnaire, your candid response will assist in the evaluation process. Please complete Section B of the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Information included in Section A of the questionnaire shall not be altered by the evaluator. If there are inconsistencies noted in Section A when received, please provide the inconsistencies found within your response. The questionnaire must be completed and submitted to the Contract Specialists bryton.curtis@noaa.gov and jadwiga.baranowski@noaa.gov and the Contracting Officer gabriela.bravo@noaa.gov no later than 3:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on May 22, 2023. The subject line in the submission email shall clearly indicate: “BAA-NOAA-GPD-2023 – Past Performance Questionnaire Submission for <Company Name>”, and the message shall originate from the reference’s government or commercial email address.

In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. This is a major NOAA acquisition and your input into this evaluation is greatly appreciated. If you have questions regarding this questionnaire or require assistance, please submit inquiries to bryton.curtis@noaa.gov, jadwiga.baranowski@noaa.gov, and gabriela.bravo@noaa.gov.

Sincerely, Gabriela Bravo Contracting Officer

BAA-NOAA-GPD-2023

SECTION A

TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR (THE FIRM REQUESTING THE REFERENCE)

PART I: OFFEROR INFORMATION

COMPANY NAME AND DIVISION NAME OF OFFEROR:

OFFEROR ADDRESS:

OFFEROR CAGE CODE # AND DUNS #

OFFEROR OPERATED AS A JOINT VENTURE (JV) DURING REQUESTED REFERENCE: YES NO

PART II: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

TITLE OF PROJECT FOR WHICH REFERENCE IS REQUESTED:

PROCUREMENT VEHICLE (e.g. CONTRACT/ORDER/SUBCONTRACT/OTHER):

TYPE OF CONTRACT (e.g. NEGOTIATED, SEALED BID):

Requirements Labor-Hour Other (Specify)

DATE OF AWARD:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):

PLACE(S) OF PERFORMANCE:

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING OFFICER / COR / COMMERCIAL PROCURING ACTIVITY’S CONTACT INFORMATION FOR WHICH REFERENCE IS REQUESTED:

· Name:

· Organization:

· Phone:

· Email:

CONTRACT AMOUNT:

· INITIAL CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE (W/OPTIONS):

· FINAL CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE (W/OPTIONS):

ROLE ON PROJECT:

PRIME

SUBCONTRACTOR (EXPLAIN TYPE AND EXTENT OF SUBCONTRACTING, IF APPLICABLE):

OTHER (EXPLAIN):

DESCRIBE THE CONTRACT OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONTRACT (E.G. TYPE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES REQUIRED, DELIVERY TIME FRAMES, PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.):

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

BAA-NOAA-GPD-2023 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

DESCRIBE RELEVANCE OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS TO THE SUBJECT SOLICITATION:

DESCRIBE HOW OFFEROR MET, DID NOT MEET, OR EXCEEDED CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:

WERE THERE DOCUMENTED ISSUES RELATED TO CONTRACT PERFORMANCE?

(CHECK BELOW, AND PROVIDE A COPY WITH PROPOSAL SUBMISSION IF APPLICABLE):

NOT APPLICABLE (DO NOT ANSWER FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS BELOW) CURE NOTICE(S)

SHOW CAUSE(S)

IF ISSUES WERE DOCUMENTED, DID THESE ISSUES RESULT IN CONTRACT TERMINATION?

(IF YES, THEN ALSO CHECK THE APPLICABLE TYPE OF TERMINATION)

NO (DO NOT ANSWER FOLLOW-UP QUESTION BELOW)

YES - - TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT/CAUSE TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE

OTHER (Specify):

IF THE CONTRACT WAS TERMINATED, BRIEFLY EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR THE TERMINATION:

SECTION B - ASSESSMENT

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR (PERSON PROVIDING REFERENCE)

PART I: REFERENCE INFORMATION

NAME & TITLE:

ORGANIZATION (INCLUDING AGENCYAND/OR COMPANY):

CONTRACT ROLE (e.g. CO, COR, PM):

ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

FAX NUMBER:

E-MAIL:

PART II: INFORMATION ABOUT PROJECT/CONTRACT FOR WHICH REFERENCE IS REQUESTED

Please identify and correct any information that is not accurate in Section A.

Please objectively assess the requesting firm in each performance element below by assigning an “X” to the most appropriate rating:

· Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

· Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

· Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

· Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

· Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Very Good

Satisfactory

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule).

Comments:

3. COST CONTROL

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.* *Cost Control – not required for Firm Fixed Price (FFP). If FFP please extend N/A in the comments box.

Comments:

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award, and management of subcontractors.

Comments:

5. MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing personnel.

Comments:

6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

FAR Subpart 19.7 and 15 U.S.C. 637 contains statutory requirements for complying with the Small Business Subcontracting Program. Assess whether the contractor provided maximum practicable opportunity for small business to participate in contract performance consistent with efficient performance of the contract.* *Not required for Small Businesses.

Comments:

7. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE:

SIGNATURE DATE

image1.png image0.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png