Attachment 1 - North Little Rock EUL Developer.docx

DOCX document 144 KB Posted

Attached to
R799--North Little Rock EUL Developer COR: Richelle Wagner
Solicitation number
36C77625Q0160
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs for an Enhanced-Use Lease (EUL) opportunity at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System Eugene Towbin campus in North Little Rock, Arkansas. The VA is seeking qualified organizations to redevelop underutilized vacant buildings, with potential uses including supportive housing for Veterans, assisted living facilities, technical job training centers, research facilities, and mixed-use developments that directly or indirectly benefit Veterans.

The RFQ (#36C77625Q0160) provides detailed submission requirements with responses due by May 30, 2025, at 5:00 PM ET. The solicitation allows for multiple developers to potentially be selected, with the VA evaluating submissions based on five equally weighted factors: Development Plan, Operations Plan, Development Team Qualifications, Operations Team Qualifications, and Financial Wherewithal. The lease can have a term of up to 99 years, and the VA expects to select one or more developers by summer 2025. Offerors must demonstrate their ability to finance, design, develop, renovate, construct, operate, and maintain the project while complying with various federal requirements including historic preservation, environmental regulations, and sustainable design standards.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C77625Q0160.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 - North Little Rock EUL Developer Attachments A - C.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Department of Veterans Affairs RFQ #: 36C77625Q0160

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

No. 36C77625Q0160

CENTRAL ARKANSAS VETERANS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM (CAVHS)

EUGENE TOWBIN CAMPUS

ENHANCED-USE LEASE PROJECT

North Little Rock, Arkansas

March 30, 2025

DATE AND TIME RESPONSES DUE: May 30, 2025, 5:00 PM ET

DATE AND TIME QUESTIONS DUE: April 18, 2025, 5:00 PM ET

DISCLAIMER

The information presented in this Request for Qualifications and all supplements, revisions, modifications, updates, and addenda thereto (collectively, the “RFQ”), including (without limitation) narrative descriptions and information, is not represented to be all of the information that may be material to Offerors’ decisions to submit responses to this RFQ to finance, design, develop, renovate, construct, operate and maintain projects on a portion of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) campus described in Attachment A.

Neither VA, nor any of its contractors, subcontractors, officers, employees, counsel, advisors, or agents make any representation or warranty, whether express, implied, or created by operation of law, as to the accuracy or completeness of this RFQ or any of its contents or materials referred to or provided pursuant to or in connection with this RFQ, and no legal liability with respect thereto is assumed or may be implied. Any information or site description is merely provided to assist Offerors in their independent analysis of the decision to submit a response. The transactions contemplated by this RFQ involve significant risks. Offerors and their advisors should review carefully all the information set forth in the RFQ and any additional information available to them to evaluate such risks.

No additional representation or warranty, whether express, implied, or created by operation of law, will be made by VA. No person has been authorized to make or give on behalf of VA any other written or oral representation, warranty or assurance with respect to the project(s) or the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this RFQ or otherwise and, if any such representation, warranty, or assurance is made or given, it may not be relied upon by any Offeror as having been made by or on behalf of VA, and VA shall not have any liability for or with respect to such statements.

Table of Contents

1EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1
1.1Authority to Outlease1
1.2RFQ Terms and Condition Acceptance1
2PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF SITE2
2.1Overview of Solicitation Structure2
2.2Location, Background and Description of the Assets2
2.3Development Considerations3
3LEASE EXHIBITS6
4SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS7
4.1Time and Date of Submission7
4.2Manner of Submission7
4.3Response Content8
5EVALUATION CRITERIA18
5.1Initial Review18
5.2Formal Presentations18
5.3Selection Process18
5.4Selection Timeline18
5.5Evaluation Factors18
6MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS RFQ22
6.1Authorizations by Submission of Response22
6.2Teaming Arrangements and Special Purpose Entities23
6.3Hold Harmless23
7Ineligibility23
8Additional Information24
ATTACHMENT A: MAPS OF EUL ASSETS AND DESCRIPTION OF ASSETS25
ATTACHMENT B: SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SAMPLE LEASE EXHIBIT OUTLINES29
ATTACHMENT C: OTHER USES SAMPLE LEASE EXHIBIT OUTLINES31

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

CENTRAL ARKANSAS VETERANS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM (CAVHS)

ENHANCED-USE LEASE OPPORTUNITY

NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), under its Enhanced-Use Leasing (EUL) authority (38 U.S.C. §§ 8161 to 8169) is pleased to issue this Request for Qualifications (RFQ or Solicitation), seeking competitive responses from qualified organizations (Offerors) in redeveloping certain underutilized vacant buildings (described in Attachment A) on the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (CAVHS) Eugene Towbin campus in North Little Rock, Arkansas. Uses may include supportive housing for Veterans and their families who are homeless and/or at-risk of homelessness and/or other uses that benefit Veterans directly or indirectly.

Authority to Outlease VA is authorized to outlease land and improvements to non-Federal entities through the EUL Program. Such leases can have a term of up to ninety-nine (99) years.

VA’s Office of Asset Enterprise Management (OAEM) administers the EUL Program. The EUL authority allows VA to partner with the public or private sector to maximize returns to Veterans from underutilized capital assets. It allows the selected Offeror(s) to finance, design, develop, renovate, construct, operate and maintain supportive housing and/or other uses that benefit Veterans directly and/or indirectly. VA envisions that development of the EUL assets will entail well-planned and coordinated endeavor, which is compatible with the campuses’ ongoing mission-related activities and the surrounding non-VA community.

Offeror(s) under the EUL authority will be authorized and responsible for financing, designing, developing, renovating, constructing, operating, and maintaining the development site in accordance with detailed development plans approved by VA (“Development Plan”) and applicable Federal, State, and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations.

RFQ Terms and Condition Acceptance VA reserves the right, at any time, without notice, at its sole and absolute discretion, to: (a) reject any or all responses; (b) extend any deadline set forth in this RFQ; and (c) terminate the RFQ process, in whole or in part.

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF SITE

Following passage of Public Law No. 117-168, The Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (PACT Act), VA may now enter into EULs that provide supportive housing and/or other uses that enhance the use of the leased property by directly or indirectly benefitting Veterans.

Project types may include but are not limited to:

· Supportive housing

· Skilled nursing facilities

· Assisted living facilities

· Technical job training centers

· Research facilities

· Mixed-use, etc.

Offeror(s) must propose a project concept that directly or indirectly benefits Veterans. Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 8162(b)(5), the proposed EUL(s) may not provide for any acquisition, contract, demonstration, exchange, grant, incentive, procurement, sale, other transaction authority, service agreement, use agreement, lease, or lease-back by VA or any other Federal entity. VA may only receive cash consideration and no forms of in-kind consideration can be accepted in lieu of cash consideration. VA may enter into an EUL without receiving consideration.

Overview of Solicitation Structure Through this RFQ, VA is presenting certain assets available for redevelopment by one or more Offerors under one or more separate EULs. Offerors may submit a response to this RFQ to develop any number of the assets described in Attachment A. See Sections 4 and 5 of this RFQ for required response content and evaluation criteria. Comment by OAEM Team: May require further discussion with OGC - Public Hearing referenced a single EUL but VA select multiple developers and enter into multiple EULs through this RFQ?

The intent of this Solicitation is to outline the requirements for selection of one or more Offeror(s) for purposes of redeveloping certain underutilized vacant buildings to benefit Veterans (directly or indirectly) and their families. It is expected that any redevelopment would also enhance CAVHS’ Eugene Towbin campus.

The Offeror(s) entering into EUL agreement(s) with VA will be responsible for all financing, designing, developing, renovating, constructing, operating, and maintaining the facility(ies).

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §8163, VA conducted a virtual Public Hearing on the EUL concept on January 23, 2025, at 5:00 PM CT.

Location, Background and Description of the Assets Attachment A contains information regarding the location, background information, and description of the subject assets.

Development Considerations In deciding whether to submit a response to develop the proposed assets, Offerors should consider certain factors.

National Historic Preservation Act Prior to entering into an EUL agreement with VA, Offeror(s) shall work with VA to fulfill the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. §§ 300101, et seq. (“NHPA”) in conjunction with the development and finalization of the proposed development plans. Section 106 of NHPA, 54 U.S.C. §§ 306108, requires the consideration of the effects of the EUL on historic properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and provides representatives of the State and local governments, tribes and other interested consulting parties sufficient opportunity to comment on the Development Plan prior to execution of the EUL agreement. Section 106 of the NHPA also requires Offerors to seek ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects (e.g., demolition) that the Development Plan might have on any historic properties during the execution stage of the EUL agreement. Consummation of this effort will be accomplished by VA. VA will act in concert with the Offeror(s), when necessary, in the accomplishment of historical compliance. For guidelines related to historic preservation requirements, visit https://www.achp.gov/protecting-historic-properties.

National Environmental Policy Act and Other Environmental Considerations The EUL(s) will be subject to all applicable Federal, State, and local environmental laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations, including but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901, et seq; and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347. NEPA requires that Federal agencies, including VA, identify and evaluate the potential environmental impacts of a major Federal action (e.g., an EUL) on the human environment. VA will complete the NEPA analysis upon VA’s selection of Offeror(s). The Offeror(s) will be required to provide development-specific information to support the analysis. The NEPA analysis must be completed by VA, prior to execution of the EUL agreement. The Offeror(s) will be responsible for complying with mitigation requirements of the NEPA analysis, if required. The Offeror(s) shall comply with all applicable environmental laws and will be responsible for any required cleanup/remediation activities. Additionally, the Offeror(s) will be responsible for any necessary environmental studies, reports, site assessments, seismic, etc. that are needed by Offeror(s) to meet obligations. Lastly, the Offeror(s) will be responsible for complying with any regulatory requirements for the abatement and removal of any asbestos and/or lead-containing material. VA expects Offeror(s) to remove (not encapsulate) hazardous materials.

Infrastructure Any available information about infrastructure regarding the EUL assets is included in Attachment A. It is the responsibility of Offerors to pay utility providers for all utilities through separate metering. It is the responsibility of Offerors to bring in the necessary utility lines (water, sewer, gas, electricity, fiber optics, communication, cable, etc.) to operate the EUL assets. VA is not obligated to provide the selected Offeror(s) access to VA-owned utilities or resources.

Legal Considerations Overview

Offerors are responsible for conducting its own due diligence regarding the EUL assets including, without limitation, whether (a) the development of the EUL assets, as contemplated by the Response, can be accomplished in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local requirements (including fire, life safety, accessibility, zoning, State and local building codes, and other local land use restrictions); (b) the condition of the EUL assets is suitable for the Offeror’s contemplated use; (c) the necessary permits, variances, special exceptions and other governmental actions or approvals required for the contemplated developments can be reasonably obtained (at no cost or expense to VA); and (d) the contemplated use(s) is otherwise practical, economically feasible and can be accomplished in accordance with relevant Federal, State and local requirements for applicable facilities. Property is under concurrent jurisdiction. Prior to the execution of the lease agreement, Offeror(s) will need to have written executed agreements (e.g., Memorandum of Understanding) regarding fire, police, and emergency services in place, including VA concurrence.

Taxes

In accordance with the pertinent provisions of the EUL Statute (i.e., 38 U.S.C. § 8167), the Offeror(s) during the EUL term will be subject to any and all applicable State and local taxes, fees, assessments, and special assessments legally chargeable to the EUL, the Offeror’s leasehold interest, and the Offeror’s underlying improvements. However, neither VA’s interest in the EUL nor the United States’ fee interest in the underlying properties shall be subject, directly or indirectly, to any State or local laws relative to taxation, fees, assessments or special assessments.

Security Offerors are responsible for providing security for the EUL assets. Offerors shall include in their response an overview of the physical security and electronic monitoring that will be provided based upon the individual space requirements and proposed EUL use. As part of the response, it should be noted that it is the requirement of Offerors to provide an appropriate level of security for the EUL assets.

Energy Conservation and Sustainable Design Requirements The VA Sustainable Design Manual (<http://www.cfm.va.gov/til/sustain.asp>) is the guidance that defines the methodology to incorporate sustainable design, including energy efficiency, in the EUL. VA encourages Offerors to incorporate sustainability over and above the standards found in the current VA Sustainable Design Manual. In previous projects, some Offerors have proposed more aggressive energy efficiency and sustainability milestones that made their proposals, all other elements considered equal, more attractive. To take advantage of existing sustainability work in the private sector that is well accepted in the construction industry, VA has determined that using a third-party rating system is the best method for fulfilling VA sustainable building requirements in the EUL(s). Offerors may propose using the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) rating system, the Green Globes® rating system, or an alternate rating system. VA requires that the project achieve at least LEED Silver, Two Green Globes, or an equivalent certification level by the alternate rating organization. Offerors proposing to use an alternate rating system must submit a memo to the VA Project Manager demonstrating that the alternate solution achieves an equivalent level of certification as LEED Silver, Two Green Globes, or both.

Prevailing Wages Unless Offerors can demonstrate to the satisfaction of VA in the form of a written determination or written correspondence from the U.S. Department of Labor that the Offeror or the project are exempt therefrom, Offeror shall comply with the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended, 40 U.S.C. § 3141, et seq. and the relevant rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor applicable thereto.

Handicap Accessibility Offerors will be required to ensure that its design, development, construction, operation, and maintenance plan and activities on the EUL assets comply in all respects with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq., and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4151, et seq., as amended.

EUL Statutory Requirements VA’s EUL and statutory requirements are codified at 38 U.S.C. §§ 8161-8169, as amended and including modifications made by Public Law No. 117-168, The Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (PACT Act), Sec. 705, “Modifications to Enhanced-Use Lease Authority of Department of Veterans Affairs”.

VA’s Goals and Objectives VA’s goals and objectives for the EUL effort include but are not limited to:

(a) Revitalize / redevelop property for the benefit of Veterans.

(b) Provide services that benefit Veterans (directly or indirectly) and/or create supportive housing for Veterans and their families who are homeless and/or at-risk of homelessness.

(c) Avoid ongoing operating costs associated with the upkeep of vacant and/or underutilized assets.

(d) Meet VA’s obligations under NHPA to better preserve and protect historic property.

(e) Create local jobs.

Other Considerations VA will not participate in or allow its or the United States’ underlying fee interest in the land to be used as security for financing for the project or otherwise, including without limitation, providing any kind of guaranty or act in any way as a beneficiary for a financing vehicle.

In regard to any proposed project-related financing to be obtained by the Offerors, VA as a general rule will not approve any financing that includes requirements that operate to deny, restrict, or subordinate VA’s right to terminate the EUL upon the Offeror’s failure to cure an outstanding event of default thereunder. This includes any document, to include the EUL that would prevent VA from terminating the EUL due to “cross default” arising from one or more parcels on the Property. Any proposed project financing that does not comply with this restriction must be explicitly identified in the RFQ response for VA’s unilateral review and evaluation. The successful Offeror(s) must establish and maintain positive relations and communications with State and local governmental authorities and the local communities during negotiations with VA and any of its representatives.

The successful Offeror(s) must integrate development activities with cultural resources and historical and environmental policy management requirements in support of VA’s mission and operations.

The Offeror(s) will be responsible for coordinating the work schedule(s) with VA in order to minimize disruption to the campus’ activities and operations. This coordination includes the work of any contractor or subcontractor that the Offeror(s) retains in connection with the project(s).

LEASE EXHIBITS

Following its selection, the Offeror(s) will be responsible for preparing detailed lease exhibits to include a Development Plan and Operations and Maintenance Plan. Attachment B and Attachment C contain sample outlines for lease exhibits for supportive housing and other uses. In addition, the Offeror(s) will need to provide other lease exhibits such as Site and Design Plans. Following Offeror selection, VA will provide detailed lease exhibit templates.

VA recognizes that formulation of the lease exhibits will require the Offeror(s) to work closely and cooperatively with VA. VA will provide final approval and cooperate with the Offeror(s) during the drafting process to facilitate preparation of the final Development Plan. It is anticipated that the Offeror(s) will provide VA with drafts of the lease exhibits throughout the drafting process. The lease exhibits will be subject to VA’s review and approval and may be subject to review and comment by local government and other stakeholders.

SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS

Time and Date of Submission Responses must be received by May 30, 2025, at 5:00 PM ET (the “Closing Time”). Responses received after the Closing Time will not be considered.

Questions regarding this RFQ may be submitted in writing by emailing Richelle Wagner at richelle.wagner@va.gov by April 18, 2025, at 5:00 PM ET. Questions received after this date may not be considered. Responses will be provided by an amendment to the RFQ. All Government communication regarding this RFQ shall be from the Portfolio Manager, Richelle Wagner.

Manner of Submission Responses will be accepted by electronic means and hard copy. For electronic submission, please submit responses via email to Richelle Wagner at richelle.wagner@va.gov. Please note, due to the size of response content, Offeror will need to submit RFQ response in multiple emails (20MB capacity per email to include attachments) labeled by section name and subsection (see RFQ Section 4.3 for additional details). The entire response must be in PDF format. In addition, any Excel or other spreadsheets that allow data to be manipulated must be included in their native (i.e., Excel), unprotected and accessible format. However, one hard copy must be delivered by mail, courier, or hand delivery to the following address:

Attention: C. Brett Simms Designated VA Representative Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Asset Enterprise Management (044C) 810 Vermont Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20420

Each hard copy of the response must be bound in a three-ring binder (to allow VA to easily remove parts for copying and/or circulation).

Responses must be in a sealed envelope or package with the following information conspicuously and legibly written or typed on the outside:

· Offeror’s name;

· Offeror’s complete mailing address;

· Name and contact information for Offeror’s contact person (e.g., telephone, email and facsimile); and

· The following statement (to be completed upon delivery to VA):

“Response Received by VA as of _____________(time) on _____________ (date)”

Response Content Each response must contain the following sections in the following order, with each section clearly labeled, beginning on a new page and not exceeding the applicable section page limit. Note: Resumes count towards the page limit.

Section #
Section Name and Subsections

(Note: Separate sections and subsections with tabs in hard copy) Page Limit

NA
Cover Letter (including Background and Administrative Information)
5 pages
1
Development Plan

Tab 1A: Development Team Composition and Structure Tab 1B: Development Concept Tab 1C: Direct and/or Indirect Veteran Benefits Provided by Project Tab 1D Development Financing Plan Tab 1E: Development Timeline Tab 1F: Veteran Hiring and Community Relations Strategies 10 pages

2
Operations Plan

Tab 2A: Operations Team Composition and Structure Tab 2B: Operations Financing Plan Tab 2C: Operations Management Approach 10 pages

3
Development Team Qualifications, Experience, and Past Performance

Tab 3A: Development Team Qualifications and Experience Tab 3B: Development Team Past Performance Tab 3C: Development Team Key Personnel Qualifications Tab 3D: Veteran Hiring and Community Relations Experience 20 pages

4
Operations Team Qualifications, Experience, and Past Performance

Tab 4A: Operations Team Qualifications and Experience Tab 4B: Operations Team Past Performance Tab 4C: Operations Team Key Personnel Qualifications 20 pages

5
Financial Wherewithal and Experience Securing Financing

Tab 5A: Financial Wherewithal Tab 5B: Experience Securing Financing 15 pages (excludes financial statements)

Appendix A
Financial Statements and Auditor’s Opinion Letter
No limit
Appendix B
Explanation of any legal issues (if any)
No limit

Pages submitted that are in excess of any page limit (including a section page limit) will, at VA’s sole discretion, be discarded and not reviewed or evaluated by VA. Supporting data, such as explanations of any legal issues, and auditor’s opinion letter, will not count against the page limits. Responses must be typewritten in Arial 11-point font size or greater. For purposes of the response, a “key team member” should be considered any member that will be responsible for approximately 20% or more of the services or fees under the proposed EUL.

Cover Letter with Background and Administrative Information A cover letter (on the Offeror’s letterhead) must state that the Offeror has read and agrees to comply with all the terms, conditions, and instructions provided in this RFQ. Any requests for waivers or exceptions must be clearly identified in the cover letter and shall be subject to VA’s review and approval.

The cover letter must also contain the following general information about the Offeror and the Offeror’s Team (if applicable). (Note: In the case of an Offeror that is a special purpose entity, include information on each partner, member, or shareholder of the Offeror.)

· Administrative Information: Company/Organization name; Employer/Tax Identification Number; Dunn and Bradstreet (DUNS) number; proof of VetBiz verification (if a service-disabled Veteran-owned small business or Veteran-owned small business); mailing address; main telephone number; and main facsimile number.

· Authorized Representative: Name and contact information (mailing address; telephone number; e-mail address; and facsimile number) of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the Offeror.

· Day-to-Day Point of Contact: Name and contact information (mailing address; telephone number; e-mail address; and facsimile number) of the individual designated by the Offeror as the person to whom questions and/or requests for information are to be directed.

· Form of Business: Description of the Offeror’s form of business (whether a for-profit corporation, a nonprofit or charitable institution, a partnership, a limited liability company, a business association or a joint venture), state of incorporation, a brief history of the organization and its principals, and the following:

· Articles of incorporation, partnership, joint venture, or limited liability company agreement (Note: For any Offeror or Team member, as applicable, that is a sole proprietorship, provide current mailing address and a summary of current business activity);

· Current certificate of good standing;

· By-laws;

· Copy of corporate resolutions, certified by a corporate officer, authorizing the Offeror’s submission of, or Team member’s participation with the Offeror in the submission of, the response and the entity’s authority to proceed with the project (assuming an RFQ award is made, and VA’s approval is obtained); and

· List of principals.

Legal Requirements

· State whether the Offeror or any Offeror’s Team member, as applicable, has ever been terminated for default, non-compliance, or non-performance on a contract or lease, or debarred from any Federal, State, or local government contracts and, if so, provide the date and a detailed description of the occurrence in an appendix (Note: this additional detail does not count against page limits); and

· List each instance within the past ten (10) years and explain in sufficient detail in an appendix as necessary (detail does not count against page limits) in which the Offeror, or any Offeror’s Team member, or any principal, partner, director, or officer of such entities was:

· Convicted of or pleaded guilty or nolo contendre to a crime (other than a traffic offense);

· Subject to an order, judgment, or decree (including as a result of a settlement), whether by a court, an administrative agency, or other governmental body, or an arbitral or other alternative dispute resolution tribunal, in any civil proceeding or action in which fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct, misrepresentation, deceit, dishonesty, breach of any fiduciary duty, embezzlement, looting, conflict of interest, or any similar misdeed was alleged (regardless of whether any wrongdoing was admitted or proven);

· Subject to an action or other proceeding, whether before a court, an administrative agency, governmental body, or an arbitral or other alternative dispute resolution tribunal, which, if decided in a manner adverse to the Offeror, Team member, principal, partner, director, or officer (as applicable), would reasonably be expected to adversely affect the ability of the Offeror or Team member to perform its obligations with respect to the project (including the ability to obtain or repay financing);

· Debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal, State, or local department or agency;

· Notified that it is in default of any Federal, State, or local contract or grant – if yes, provide the reason for the default and whether the default was cured;

· Terminated for cause or default on one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local); and

· Party to litigation or a formal Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process (e.g., binding arbitration) involving a claim in excess of $50,000. For those matters involving a claim equal to or in excess of $500,000, describe in detail the litigation or ADR process.

Section 1: Development Plan In this section, the Offeror should include all relevant information necessary to allow VA to assess the Offeror’s overall Development Plan. Specifically, this section must include the following:

Tab 1A: Development Team Composition and Structure

Provide brief descriptions of Offeror entity and the Offeror’s Development Team members (i.e., organizational purposes or missions, services provided, etc.), including key roles and responsibilities. The Offeror should describe past experience working with the Offeror’s Team members. Provide an organizational chart showing the relationship between the Offeror and the Offeror’s Team members, as appropriate, along with their roles and responsibilities. Explain the Offeror’s approach to managing the Team, including prior experience engaging and overseeing the work of multiple Team members and subcontractors.

Tab 1B: Development Concept

Provide a brief description of the Development Concept (e.g., supportive housing and/or other uses) to include conceptual site layout showing parking, amenities, etc. If the Offeror Team proposes to redevelop only a portion of the assets identified in Attachment A, specify which assets are proposed for redevelopment and their intended use. The project description should also address any intended phasing associated with the development. Include a narrative describing the proposed construction methods associated with the project. Provide a summary of the Offeror Team’s understanding of VA’s development objectives (see RFQ Section 2.3.8). Identify potential risks and challenges associated with the project and related mitigation strategies.

If supportive housing is proposed, include the type of project (e.g., permanent housing, assisted living, etc.), target populations, and estimated breakdown of units. Offerors should provide a justification that supports the proposed project size for the given target residents. Offerors should support the proposed project size and target population by citing available market demand data and local market knowledge. The project developed on the EUL assets must be affordable to the applicable target population(s).

Tab 1C: Direct and/or Indirect Veteran Benefits Provided by Project

Identify how the proposed development will enhance the use of the leased property by directly or indirectly benefitting Veterans as authorized by 38 U.S. Code §8162(a)(2)(A)(ii)(I-II).

Tab 1D: Development Financing Plan

Provide a narrative that describes the Offeror Team’s strategy to obtain development financing for this project, including contingency plan(s) in the event one or more sources of funding are not available. The narrative should also explain key assumptions reflected in the Development Budget (Sources and Uses) to be provided in a working Microsoft Excel document (excluded from page count).

The Development Budget must show estimated: (a) total development costs for the project, including hard and soft costs; (b) financing costs, including types and amounts of debt and equity, and underlying amortization periods; (c) ownership structure, including percentage of ownership by the Offeror (or in the case of a special purpose entity, each Team member); and, (d) all capital funding sources, equity provided by the lessee, Federal, State and local government funding, grant proceeds, loan proceeds, etc.) used to finance the project.

Tab 1E: Development Timeline

The Offeror’s response must contain a timetable for the project containing the following key dates:

(1) Project financing sources: Anticipated application, award, and closing dates for each project phase (as applicable).

(2) Design milestones: Completion dates for each project phase (as applicable).

(3) EUL Execution: EUL execution cannot occur until all financing commitments have been obtained, the Office of Management and Budget has completed its review of the EUL, and Congress has been provided 45-day notification of VA’s intent to execute the EUL;

(4) Construction: Start and completion dates for each project phase (as applicable); and,

(5) Occupancy: Date the facility is open for operation for each project phase (as applicable).

Tab 1F: Proposed Veteran Hiring and Community Relations Strategies

The project will require a staff of qualified development professionals, administrators, and support staff. Describe the Offeror’s outreach strategies to maximize participation of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs), local small businesses, and other small businesses. Provide a summary of the Offeror Team’s plan to increase employment opportunities (to also include internships) for Veterans associated with this project.

Explain the Offeror Team’s customized approach to managing community relations and interacting with State and local government officials (i.e., zoning, environmental, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), local community, stakeholders, etc.) in developing and/or operating similar projects.

Section 2: Operations Plan In this section, the Offeror should include all relevant information necessary to allow VA to assess the Offeror’s overall Operations Plan. Specifically, this section must include the following:

Tab 2A: Operations Team Composition and Structure

Provide brief descriptions of Offeror entity and the Offeror’s Operations Team members (i.e., organizational purposes or missions, services provided, etc.), including key roles and responsibilities. The Offeror should describe past experience working with the Offeror’s Team members. Provide an organizational chart for project operations showing the relationship between the Offeror and the Offeror’s Operations Team members, as appropriate, along with their roles and responsibilities. Explain the Offeror’s approach to managing the Operations Team, including prior experience engaging and overseeing the work of multiple Team members and subcontractors.

Tab 2B: Operations Financing Plan

Provide a narrative that describes the Offeror Team’s strategy to obtain operating revenues for this project, including contingency plan(s) in the event one or more sources of revenue are not received / available. The narrative should also explain key assumptions reflected in the Annual Operating Budget to be provided in a working Microsoft Excel document (excluded from page count). List all estimated annual revenues for the project, including expected fees, payments, and rates associated with the development project type (i.e. supportive housing and/or other uses). In addition, list all expected annual operating expenses associated with the project. Provide a 30-year cash flow projection in a working Microsoft Excel document (excluded from page count).

Tab 2C: Operations Management Approach

Describe the Offeror Team’s approach to operation, management, security, and maintenance of the project in accordance with private sector standards. Provide a staffing plan (number of FTEs and type) for the ongoing operation of the project. The response shall contain the physical and electronic security measures that will be provided based upon the individual space requirements and tenant mix of the proposed EUL.

For supportive housing, identify which supportive/resident services are to be provided on-site, as well as who is going to provide them. The Offeror Team should clearly differentiate between any services to be provided by VA as a part of the HUD-VASH Program versus other unrelated services proposed to be provided by the Offeror’s Team. As a reminder, the Offeror Team is required to provide services above and beyond the VA-provided HUD-VASH case management services. The response should also contain information about coordination with other programs and service providers, as well as performance objectives. Supportive services may include but not be limited to:

· An initial assessment and collaborative case management/self-sufficiency planning in coordination with the Veteran and VA staff; support, coordinate, monitor, and evaluate on-going service needs with each Veteran.

· On-site substance abuse/mental health counseling and health assessments and referrals.

· Employment / income assessments, supported work and community service opportunities based on skills and employment readiness; on-site training of employment skills programs to include computer skills, employment placements and new programs that target mobility for handicapped Veterans.

· Specialized services for women, chronically mentally ill, frail and elderly Veterans that provide enhanced clinical and case management supports and specialty programming.

Tab 2D: Proposed Veteran Hiring and Community Relations Strategies for Project Operations

The project will require a staff of qualified property management, administrators, and support staff. Describe the Offeror’s outreach strategies to maximize participation of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs), local small businesses, and other small businesses, in all aspects of project operations. Provide a summary of the Offeror Team’s plan to increase employment opportunities (to also include internships) for Veterans associated with this project.

Explain the Offeror Team’s experience and customized approach to managing community relations in operating similar projects. Describe any experience in managing relations with the surrounding community (i.e., participation in local Town Hall meetings, relationships with community-based service providers, etc.).

Section 3: Development Team Qualifications, Experience, and Past Performance In this section, the response should include all relevant information necessary to allow VA to assess the Offeror Team’s relevant development qualifications, experience, and past performance in supportive housing development and/or other uses, as applicable. Specifically, this section must include the following:

Tab 3A: Development Team Qualifications and Experience

List and explain in sufficient detail the Offeror Team’s relevant development qualifications and experience. Identify any past experience working with VA and Federal, State and local governments, if any. Describe the Team’s experience securing financing for comparable projects. Identify any past experience working with VA and Federal, state and local governments, if any. If already selected, provide the proposed:

· Architecture firm’s background and experience, design philosophy, location; and,

· Construction firm’s background and experience, location, number of employees, and bonding capacity.

If these entities have not yet been selected, the Offeror should describe the anticipated selection process.

Tab 3B: Development Team Past Performance

Describe three (3) similar projects (past or current) developed by the Offeror or one of its Team members that are comparable to the proposed development (i.e. supportive housing and/or other uses, as applicable). Each project described should have been completed within the past ten (10) years. For each project listed, the following information should be included:

· Project name

· Location

· Type of project / use

· Size of project (square footage, units, number of buildings, acreage, etc.)

· Amount, type, and sources of financing

· Historic buildings (if any)

· Description of the associated infrastructure

· Date of project completion

· Number of years involved with the development

· Role of the Offeror Team member(s)

· Contact information for a reference who VA can contact regarding performance and client or stakeholder (as applicable) satisfaction. Note: Including a reference on this list will constitute authorization for VA to contact and discuss the Offeror’s or Team member’s performance.

Tab 3C: Development Team Key Personnel Qualifications

Identify the Key Personnel who will lead the development tasks, as well as the day-to-day point of contact. For each Key Personnel named provide a:

· Description of their proposed role;

· Discussion of the extent to which key personnel have worked together on other similar projects; and,

· Resume that includes a description of the person’s duties and responsibilities, education, years of relevant experience, certifications/licenses, skills, expertise, other relevant qualifications (Note: Resumes count against page limits).

Tab 3D: Veteran Hiring and Community Relations Experience

Describe any experience implementing targeted Veteran hiring efforts and the results of those efforts. Explain the Offeror Team’s experience managing community relations and interacting with State and local government officials (i.e., zoning, environmental, SHPO, local community, stakeholders, etc.). Describe any experience in managing relations with the surrounding community (i.e., participation in local Town Hall meetings, relationships with community-based service providers, etc.).

Section 4: Operations Team Qualifications, Experience, and Past Performance In this section, the response should include all relevant information necessary to allow VA to assess the Offeror Team’s relevant property management and operations qualifications, experience, and past performance in supportive housing management and/or other uses, as applicable. Specifically, this section must include the following:

Tab 4A: Operations Team Qualifications and Experience

List and explain in sufficient detail the Offeror Team’s relevant property management and staff qualifications and experience. Identify any past experience working with VA, Federal, State and local governments, if any.

Tab 4B: Operations Team Past Performance

Describe three (3) relevant property management efforts (past or current) operated by the Offeror or one of its Team members that are comparable to the proposed project (i.e. supportive housing and/or other uses, as applicable). Each project described should have been completed within the past ten (10) years. For each project listed, the following information should be included:

· Project name

· Location

· Type of project / use(s)

· Size of project (square footage, units, number of buildings, acreage, etc.)

· Amount, type, and sources of financing

· Historic buildings (if any)

· Description of the associated infrastructure

· Date of project completion

· Number of years involved with the development

· Role of the Offeror Team member(s)

· Contact information for a reference who VA can contact regarding performance and client or stakeholder (as applicable) satisfaction. Note: Including a reference on this list will constitute authorization for VA to contact and discuss the Offeror’s or Team member’s performance

Tab 4C: Operations Team Key Personnel

Identify the Key Personnel who will lead the Property Management (and, if applicable, supportive services) tasks, as well as the day-to-day point of contact. For each Key Personnel named provide a:

· Description of their proposed role;

· Discussion of the extent to which key personnel have worked together on other similar projects; and,

· Resume that includes a description of the person’s duties and responsibilities, education, years of relevant experience, certifications/licenses, skills, expertise, other relevant qualifications (Note: Resumes count against page limits).

Section 5: Financial Wherewithal and Experience Securing Financing

In this section, the response should include all relevant information necessary to allow VA to assess the Offeror Team’s financial wherewithal and ability to secure financing for supportive housing development and/or other uses. Specifically, this section must include the following:

Tab 5A: Financial Wherewithal

Provide a general overview of the Offeror Team’s financial stability and evidence of their financial wherewithal to develop supportive housing and/or other uses, as applicable, with associated infrastructure and amenities. Please attach supporting documentation to include an auditor’s opinion letter(s) and the Offeror and its Team members’ most recent audited financial statements. If audited financial statements are not available, please submit unaudited financial statements. (Note: Supporting documentation and financial statements do not count against the page limits.)

Tab 5B: Experience Securing Financing

Summarize the Offeror Team’s experience directly securing financing for similar projects to the proposed project in the last 10 years. Provide brief descriptions of three (3) similar efforts for which the Offeror’s Team has directly secured financing. For example, include project information, including:

· Project name

· Location

· Description of project type / use(s)

· Total development cost

· Specific funding sources secured / received (development and revenue sources), and

· Role of the Offeror Team member(s).

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Initial Review Following the RFQ submission deadline, VA will initially review all submissions for completeness and adherence to the requirements and conditions set out in this RFQ. VA reserves the right to reject submissions that are incomplete or fail to adhere to the requirements set forth in this RFQ.

Formal Presentations Complete and acceptable submissions will be further reviewed and evaluated by VA, ranked in order, and a “competitive range” established. Offerors whose submissions are found to be within the competitive range may be given the opportunity, at VA’s sole discretion, to make a formal presentation to VA and receive questions regarding their response. If a presentation is required, notice will be provided to those Offerors asked to make a presentation and the details regarding that presentation (i.e., length of presentation, etc.) will be provided in the notice.

Selection Process The Government intends to review all factors for award in making its selection. Selection will be based on an integrated assessment of the factors set forth in Section 5.5 below.

Selection Timeline VA anticipates selection of one or more Offeror(s) by summer 2025.

Evaluation Factors The responses will be evaluated based on the following five equally weighted factors. Where factors include subfactors, each subfactor will also be equally weighted. The evaluation factors are as follows:

5.5.1 Factor 1: Development Plan

Factor 1 will consist of an assessment of the Offeror’s Development team composition and structure, development concept for supportive housing and/or other uses, as applicable, direct and/or indirect Veteran benefits, financing plan, timeline, and Veteran hiring and community relations for this project. Factor 1 is comprised of the following six (6) equally weighted subfactors:

Subfactor 1A: Development Team Composition and Structure

VA will assess the Offeror Team’s composition to assess capabilities and skillsets, including key roles and responsibilities. VA will also assess the extent to which the Offeror’s Team has worked together previously on similar projects. The organizational chart will be reviewed to understand the relationships between the different Team members and establish whether clear lines of accountability are in place.

Subfactor 1B: Development Concept

VA will review the Offeror Team’s Development Concept (including conceptual site layout, proposed assets to be redeveloped, and proposed construction methods) and understanding of VA’s development objectives to assess how the Offeror Team proposes to effectively accomplish the project. The response should demonstrate the Offeror Team’s understanding of the project, potential risks and challenges, proposed mitigation strategies, and the importance of close communication and collaboration with VA throughout the process. The response should also provide a strong understanding of all of the elements required for supportive housing development and/or other uses, as applicable.

Subfactor 1C: Direct and/or Indirect Veteran Benefits Provided by Project

VA will assess if Offeror(s) development plans include a clear concept that provides direct and/or indirect benefits to Veterans under the EUL authority such as supportive housing and/or other uses, as applicable. The Offeror must provide an explanation of how the development would be consistent with statutory requirements.

Subfactor 1D: Development Financing Plan

A realistic and viable financing plan should be provided for the project. VA will review the anticipated sources and uses for the project’s development to assess the Offeror Team’s understanding of the project and funding availability, including contingency plans.

Subfactor 1E: Development Timeline

VA will review the proposed project timeline for completeness and inclusion of all required milestones. The Offeror Team should provide a realistic project development timeline for VA’s review.

Subfactor 1F: Veteran Hiring and Community Relations Strategies

VA will assess the Offeror Team’s community relations strategy for the project’s development and the extent of the Offeror Team’s local knowledge and understanding. VA will also assess the extent to which the Offeror Team’s proposed outreach plan will maximize the participation of SDVOSBs, VOSBs, local small business, and other small businesses in all aspects of the project. It is also important that the Offeror Team provide a clear and realistic plan to hire Veterans (and provide internships for Veterans) in association with this project.

5.5.2 Factor 2: Operations Plan

Factor 2 will consist of an assessment of the Offeror’s Operations team composition and structure, operations financing plan, operations management approach, supportive services (if applicable), and Veteran…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .