Attachment 04 - PPQ.pdf
PDF 567 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Foam Buoys Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70Z08425RWOPL0001
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) used by the U.S. Coast Guard Operational Logistics Command to evaluate a contractor's previous performance. The form is designed to be completed by a reference familiar with the contractor's work, assessing performance across five key areas: quality of product/service, schedule adherence, cost control, business relations, and management of key personnel. The evaluation uses a rating scale of Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory for each performance category, with space for detailed comments and an overall recommendation on whether the organization would award another contract to the contractor.
The PPQ is part of a solicitation (70Z08425RWOPL0001) for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract for Foam Buoys, which will provide waterway aids to navigation for the U.S. Coast Guard. The form requires the reference to submit the completed questionnaire directly to the Contract Specialist, Barbara Spruill, via email (barbara.t.spruill@uscg.mil) or fax ((757) 628-4135), and must be received by the offer due date. The final section allows the reference to provide an overall assessment of the contractor and recommend whether they would work with the contractor again.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 02 - Clauses-Provisions-Addenda - Rev-1.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 01 - Statement of Work Rev-1.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 03 - Schedule of Prices (Foam Buoys)Rev-1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 05 - Shipping Destination Rev-1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 05 - Shipping Destinations.pdf | ||
| Attachment 07 - DD250.pdf | ||
| Attachment 09 - Spec. 393_C.1 High Intensity Films.pdf | ||
| Attachment 10 - Spec. 460-I_Buoy Solar Battery Box.pdf | ||
| Drawings combined Attachments 11-25.pdf | ||
| Attachment 01 - Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Attachment 03 - Schedule of Prices (Foam Buoys).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 06 - Request for Clarification.pdf | ||
| Attachment 08 - Spec. 450_G_Foam Buoys.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis-Solicitation 70Z08425RWOPL0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 02 - Clauses-Provisions-Addenda.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
70Z08425RWOPL0001
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Attachment 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. COAST GUARD
OPERATIONAL LOGISTICS COMMAND (LOG-9)
CONTRACTING AND PROCUMENT
300 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 965
NORFOLK, VA 23510-9112
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
I. INSTRUCTIONS
The company (i.e., contractor) that sent you this questionnaire intends to submit an offer in response to a U.S. Coast Guard solicitation and has identified you as a reference to validate their performance. This PPQ must be completed by the person most familiar with the contractors’ performance on a present or previous contract and then submitted directly to the U.S. Coast Guard by the person completing the PPQ. Please DO NOT send the completed PPQ to the contractor being evaluated. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. We are thanking you in advance for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire.
Please submit the completed form to the Contract Specialist via one of the following methods: (1) E-mail to barbara.t.spruill@uscg.mil or (2) Fax to (757) 628-4135, Attn: LOG-95, Barbara Spruill (Contractor).
Please contact the Contract Specialist, (Barbara Spruill), at (757) 628-4159 if you have any questions.
The completed PPQ is due on or before the “Offer Due Date/Local Time”, unless the due date is extended via a Solicitation Amendment.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATOR & ORGANIZATION/COMPANY
INFORMATION
1 Your Name:
2 Your Title:
Your Organization/
Company Name:
4 Address:
5 Your Phone Number:
6 Your Fax Number:
7 Your E-mail Address:
8 Date:
9 Your Signature:
B. CONTRACTOR NAME & CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1 Name of Contractor being evaluated:
2 Type of Instrument (e.g., Contract, Purchase Order, Task Order, Other):
3 Pricing Type (e.g., Fixed Price, Time & Material, Cost Reimbursement, Other):
4 Contract or Reference Number:
5 Subcontract Number (if applicable):
6 Order Number (if applicable):
Role of Contractor listed in #1 above
(if sub, also provide name of prime)
Prime Contractor
Subcontractor 8 Description of Service/Supply:
9 Competitive (Y/N):
10 Follow-On (Y/N):
11 Date of Award:
12 Initial Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
13 Final Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
14 Period of Performance:
15 Place(s) of Performance:
16 Complexity of Work
17 If applicable , type and extent of subcontracting:
III. GENERAL GUIDANCE
Please use the following ratings to score the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):
RATING DESCRIPTION
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the evaluation area being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
IV. EVALUATION: Rate the contractor in each of the following Evaluation Areas.
A. Quality of Product or Service. Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., specified technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards). List and assess any sub-elements to indicate different efforts where appropriate. For example: Are reports/data accurate? Does the service provided meet the specifications of the contract? Does the contractor’s work measure up to commonly accepted technical or professional standards? What degree of Government technical direction was required to solve problems that arise during performance?
RATING Satisfactory Unsatisfactory N/A
Check
Comment(s):
B. Schedule. Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance). For example: Is the Contractor completing the services in a timely manner? Did the Contractor adequately schedule the work? Has the Contractor met administrative milestone dates?
Has the Contractor meet physical milestone dates specified by contract, or agreed to, in the project schedule? If the schedule has slipped through the Contractor’s fault or negligence, has the Contractor taken appropriate corrective action of its own volition? Has the Contractor furnish all required deliverables on or ahead of schedule? Has the Contractor furnished updated project schedules on a timely basis?
C. Cost Control. Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract or order cost. For example: Does the contractor keep within the total estimated cost (what is the relationship of the negotiated costs and budgeted costs to actuals)? Did the contractor do anything innovative that resulted in cost savings? Were billings current, accurate and complete? Are the contractor’s budgetary internal controls adequate? Has the Contractor notified the Government and taken necessary corrective actions when the cost estimate exceeds available funds? (Not required for Fixed Price type contracts or orders.)
D. Business Relations. Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification and resolution of issues in controversy), and customer satisfaction. Is the contractor oriented toward the customer? Is interaction between the contractor and your organization satisfactory, or does it need improvement? Also, in making the assessment, include the adequacy of the contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems; and the contractor’s management of, if a substantial amount of property has been provided to the contractor under the contract.
E. Management of Key Personnel. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel. For example, how well did the contractor match the qualifications of the key position, as described in the contract, with the person who filled the key position? Did the contractor support key personnel so they were able to work effectively? If a key person did not perform well, what action was taken by the contractor to correct this? If a replacement of a key person was necessary, did the replacement meet or exceed the qualifications of the position as described in the contract schedule?
V. SUMMARY
Would your organization/company award another contract to this Contractor (or use the services of the Contractor again)? Yes / No
In summary, if you care to, please give your overall assessment of this Contractor.
Do you have any additional comments to add?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .