Attachment 04 ATFS - 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 159 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aerial Target Flight Services (ATFS-4)
- Solicitation number
- W900KK21R0002
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and information on a related federal contract opportunity for aerial target flight services. The opportunity seeks proposals for aerial target flight operations and maintenance services at locations including Fort Bliss, Texas and White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, as well as other domestic and overseas sites. Services required include target assembly, flight, recovery, maintenance, and environmental and quality assurance functions. The contract type is non-commercial and has a period of performance of 60 months. The past performance questionnaire is intended to collect feedback on offerors' relevant previous work for consideration in the contract award. It asks respondents to evaluate offerors on criteria such as compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness, cost controls, and customer satisfaction.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does [and/or notify the Contracting Officer]. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| Source Selection Plan - Subjec - ATFS-4 - Rev 01 (16 SEP 20) 33 |
| Source Selection Plan - Subjec - ATFS-4 - Rev 01 (16 SEP 20) 34 |
| Source Selection Plan - Subjec - ATFS-4 - Rev 01 (16 SEP 20) 35 |
| Source Selection Plan - Subjec - ATFS-4 - Rev 01 (16 SEP 20) 36 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .