This file is a self-scoring matrix template for offerors responding to the Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Phase I evaluation. The matrix is designed for offerors to self-score their technical experience in chemical production capabilities across multiple volume thresholds. Offerors complete only the yellow cells in the template by entering their company name and providing self-scores for production experience ranging from over 30 million pounds down to 1.5 to 2.99 million pounds, with corresponding point values and weight factors applied to calculate weighted self-scores. The matrix allocates a maximum of 1000 points with a weight factor of 750, yielding a maximum possible weighted score of 250 points for the technical experience evaluation criterion.
This template is part of a phased evaluation approach for the RFAAP competition managed by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Rock Island Arsenal under Notice ID W519TC-26-R-00003. The government is requesting industry feedback on the phased evaluation methodology and the self-scoring matrix approach for Phase I, with industry responses to be submitted to designated government points of contact. This is a Request for Information (RFI) announcement; responses are not reimbursable and no contract award is contemplated at this stage.
The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Production
Attachment XXXX
EXPERIENCE SELF SCORING MATRIX - MAINTENANCE
Note: See Instructions for Offerors Section L for Instructions
OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE]
Offerors only update the yellow cells below
Points:
Weight Factor
Max Possible Weighted Score
Offeror's Self- Score Pts
Weighted Self-Score
Work Sample Title
Section L
Technical Experience
1000
750
250
Production of chemicals
>30M lbs.
5-29.9M lbs.
<4.9M lbs.
Work Sample 1
3
3000
0
Work Sample 2
3
3000
0
Work Sample 3
3
3000
0
Production of NC
>10M lbs.
3-9.9M lbs.
<2.99M lbs.
Work Sample 1
2
2000
0
Work Sample 2
2
2000
0
Production of Single Base Propellant
>4M lbs.
2.5-3.99M lbs
<2.49M lbs.
Work Sample 1
3
3000
0
Work Sample 2
3
3000
0
Production of Double and/or Triple Base Propellant
>3M lbs.
1.5-2.99M lbs
<1.49M lbs.
Work Sample 1
2
2000
0
Performance Related Experience
1000
900
750
500
0
Average of the Most Recent CPARS Rating the Offeror has Received on its Production of chemicals Work Samples for the Quality, Schedule, and Management Categories.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory/ Neutral / No CPARS Available
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
2
2000
0
Average of the Most Recent CPARS Rating the Offeror has Received on its Production of NC Work Samples for the Quality, Schedule, and Management Categories.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory/ Neutral / No CPARS Available
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
2
2000
0
Average of the Most Recent CPARS Rating the Offeror has Received on its Production of Single Base Propellant Work Samples for the Quality, Schedule, and Management Categories.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory/ Neutral / No CPARS Available
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
2
2000
0
Maximum Possible Weighted Score
27,000
Offeror's Total Weighted Self-Score
0
Government-Validated Weighted Self-Score
Safety
Attachment XXXX
EXPERIENCE SELF SCORING MATRIX - MAINTENANCE
Note: See Instructions for Offerors Section L for Instructions
OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE]
Offerors only update the yellow cells below
Points:
Weight Factor
Max Possible Weighted Score
Offeror's Self- Score Pts
Weighted Self-Score
Work Sample Title
Section L
Technical Experience
500
0
Corporate Safety Culture
Samples include project-specific safety plans that were accepted by the client
Samples do not include project-specific safety plans that were accepted by the client
Work Sample 1
2
1000
0
Work Sample 2
2
1000
0
Safety Management System
Samples provide an SMS plan (e.g., ISO 45001) that was used on a relevant project.
Samples do not provide an SMS plan (e.g., ISO 45001) that was used on a relevant project.
Work Sample 1
3
1500
0
Work Sample 2
3
1500
0
Hazard Analysis Process
Samples include a completed Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), HAZOP, or similar study for a relevant industrial process.
Samples do not include a completed Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), HAZOP, or similar study for a relevant industrial process.
Work Sample 1
2
1000
0
Work Sample 2
2
1000
0
1000
900
750
500
0
Experience Modification Rate (EMR)
<0.75
0.75-0.85
0.85-1.00
1.01-1.15
>1.15
3
3000
0
3-Year Average Total Case Incident Rate (TRIR)
<1.0
1.0-2.0
2.1-3.0
3.1-4.0
>4.0
3
3000
0
Performance Related Experience
1000
900
750
500
0
Average of the Most Recent CPARS Rating the Offeror has Received on its Corporate Safety Culture Work Samples for the Quality, Schedule, and Management Categories.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory/ Neutral / No CPARS Available
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
2
2000
0
Average of the Most Recent CPARS Rating the Offeror has Received on its Safety Management System Work Samples for the Quality, Schedule, and Management Categories.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory/ Neutral / No CPARS Available
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
2
2000
0
Average of the Most Recent CPARS Rating the Offeror has Received on its Hazard Analysis Process Work Samples for the Quality, Schedule, and Management Categories.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory/ Neutral / No CPARS Available
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
2
2000
0
Maximum Possible Weighted Score
19,000
Offeror's Total Weighted Self-Score
0
Government-Validated Weighted Self-Score
Small Business
Attachment XXXX
EXPERIENCE SELF SCORING MATRIX - MAINTENANCE
Note: See Instructions for Offerors Section L for Instructions
OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE]
Offerors only update the yellow cells below
Points:
Weight Factor
Max Possible Weighted Score
Offeror's Self- Score Pts
Weighted Self-Score
Work Sample Title
Section L
Experience
1000
900
750
500
250
0
Number of Small Business Categories Met or Exceeded (Small Business Concerns, Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns, HUBZone Small Business Concerns, and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns) on ISR/SSR
