Attachment_0005__Past_Performance.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replacement Roofing Visitor Center CAHA Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P5125Q0029
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity to replace the roof at the Fort Raleigh Visitor Center at Cape Hatteras National Seashore in Nags Head, North Carolina. The solicitation (Number 140P5125Q0029) involves removing and reinstalling solar panels, mounts, and associated wiring during the roof replacement project. The questionnaire is designed for a previous or current contractor to provide detailed performance ratings across five evaluation categories: overall performance, timeliness, quality of work, ability to resolve problems, and an overall contractor performance rating. The evaluation uses a scale ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with the intent of collecting source selection information for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Question_and_Answers_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5125Q0029_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5125Q0029.pdf | ||
| Attachment_0001__140P5125Q0029.pdf | ||
| Attachment_002__SOW.pdf | ||
| Attachment_0003__Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment_0006__Bid_Bond.pdf | ||
| Attachment_0004__Price_Schedule.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation#140P5125Q0029
Please complete this Questionnaire and Submit with your Quote
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf, Solicitation Number: 140P5125Q0029 for Cape Hatteras Island National Seashore, Nags Head, North Carolina, 27954. Replacement of Roofs. To replace roof on the Fort Raleigh Visitor Center and remove and reinstall the Solar Panels and all associated mounts and wiring. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Notice to Contractor
Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
Please complete this Questionnaire and submit with your quote
Questionnaire is due to prior to the closing of RFP #140P5125Q0029.
POC name:
POC phone number:
POC e-mail address:
Thank you.
************************************************************************************* NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: ________________________ Fax: _____________________
E-Mail: _______________________
I. Current or Historical Contract Information CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number:
2. Contract Value:
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
Title: Phone:
E-mail:
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the |
Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation Question 1. Performance What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Work
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .