Attachment 0001_M299 Launcher and Engineering Services SOW_11072024.pdf

CUI/CTI/EXPT/PROCURE W31P4Q-XX-X-XXXX

Contract Attachment 0001

Statement of Work

CUI/CTI/EXPT/PROCURE

Statement of Work (SOW) For Production, Spares, and Services For

M299 Longbow HELLFIRE (LBHF)

Launcher

W31P4Q-XX-X-XXXX

07 November 2024

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C. Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies and their contractors; Administrative or Operational Use, Export Controlled; 23 Apr 2020. Other requests for this document shall be referred to Tactical Aviation and Ground Munitions (TAGM)

WARNING - This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms

- . Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate in accordance with

C-1.0 – Production of the M299 Longbow HELLFIRE Launcher (LBHL)

C-1.0 - Production C-1.1 – Applicable Documents C-1.2 – Program Management C-1.3 – Production Engineering and Planning

C-1.3.1 – Production Status Reporting C-1.3.2 – Manufacturing Process Planning & Control C-1.3.3 – Production Working Group (PWG) C-1.3.4 – C- – Product/Process Validation (P/PV) C-1.3.6 – Parts Obsolescence Program

C-1.4 – Product Assurance C-1.4.1 – Quality System C-1.4.2 – Product Acceptance

C-1.4.2.1 – Government Validation C-1.4.2.2 – Test Procedures C-1.4.2.3 – Software and Firmware C-1.4.2.4 – Product Acceptance Changes C- – Configuration C-1.4.2.6 – Accuracy C-1.4.2.7 – Point of Contact C- – Maintenance of Government Furnished Test Equipment

(GFTW)

C-1.4.3 – Process and Fabrication C-1.4.4 – First Article Test (FAT) C- – Parts Management Program (PMP) C-1.4.6 – Failure Reporting and Corrective Action System (FRACAS)

C-1.4.6.1 – Corrective Action Board (CAB) C-1.4.7 – Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) C- – Supplier Control C- – Non-Conforming Material

C- – Material Review Board (MRB) C-1.4.10 – Materials, Finishes, and Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPC)

Program C-1.4.10.1 – Corrosion Prevention and Deterioration Control (CPDC) Plan C-1.4.10.2 – Process/Finish Specification C-1.4.10.3 – Verification and Testing Methods

C-1.4.11 – Warranty Status Report C-1.4.12 – Supplier Assessment Survey (SAS) C-1.4.13 – Special Inspection Equipment (SIE) Validation and Control C-1.4.13.1 – Maintenance of Government-Furnished SIE

C- – Configuration & Data Management (CDM) C- – Administration C- – Configuration Identification and Control

C- – Functional Baseline C- – Allocated Baseline C- – Product Baseline

C- – Configuration Status Accounting (CSA)

C- – Physical Configuration Audits (PCA) C- – Data

C- – Data Management C-1.6 – Test and Evaluation C-1.7 –

C-1.7.1 – Preservation and Packaging C-1.7.1.1 – Design

C-1.7.2 – Transportation C-1.7.3 – Item Unique Identification (IUID) C-1.7.4 – Unique Identifier (UID) C- – Special Packaging Instructions (SPIs)

C- – Safety C- – System Engineering

C-2.0 – SPARES

C-2.1 – Manufacture C-2.2 – Production Engineering and Planning

C-2.2.1 – Production Status Reporting C-2.2.2 – Manufacturing Process Planning & Control

C-2.3 – Product Assurance/Quality C-2.3.1 – Quality System C-2.3.2 – Quality System Access C-2.3.3 – Product Acceptance C-2.3.4 – First Article Test (FAT) C- – Non-Conforming Material C-2.3.6 – Parts Management Program (PMP) C-2.3.7 – Failure Reporting and Corrective Action (FRCAS) C- – Corrective Action Board (CAB) C- – Environmental Stress Screening

C-2.4 – Configuration Management C- – Test and Evaluation C-2.6 –

C-2.6.1 – Preservation and Packaging C-2.6.1.1 – Design C-2.6.1.2 – Transportation C-2.6.1.3 – Item Unique Identification (IUID) C-2.6.1.4 – Unique Identifier (UID) C- – Special Packaging Instructions (SPIs)

C-2.7 – Program Management C-2. – System Engineering

C-3.0 – Security Requirements C-3.1 – Security C-3.2 – Information Assurance / Cyber Security

C-4.0 – Contractor Manpower Reporting C-5.0 – Business

C- – Integrated Master Schedule C-6.0 – Government Property C-7.0 – Engineering Services

C-7.1 Definitions C-7.2 Technical Management C-7.3 Task Activation and Control C-7.4 Program Management C- C-7.6 Product Assurance C-7.7 Integrated Product Support C- C-7.7.2 Preventing Counterfeit Parts and Materials C-7.7.3 Transportation and Packaging Requirements C- C- C-7.7.6 Operation and Support Cost Reduction Analysis C-7.7.7 Product Support Analysis Data C- C- C- C- C-7.10 Government Property C-8.0 – Acronym List

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

C-1.0 PRODUCTION OF THE M299 LONGBOW HELLFIRE LAUNCHER (LBHL).

This SOW provides for the parts to meet the acceptance criteria in accordance with (IAW) MIS- , MIS- and the requirements of this contract. This effort delivers the hardware quantities identified in Contract Section B which meet the requirements of Performance Specifications (PS), MIS-and MIS- (Attachment 0009).

C-1.1 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS. Applicable top-level documents are identified by Contract

(Attachment 0004) generic references (without revision letters) cited in the SOW.

C-1.2 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.

C-1.2.1 The Contractor shall conduct quarterly Program Management Reviews (PMRs) with the Government (occurring concurrently with AGMS Missile PMRs when practical). The Government and Contractor shall mutually establish the agenda for the PMRs to ensure it covers all the critical issues for the quarter.

C-1.2.2 Integrated Product Teams (IPTs). The Contractor shall establish and implement Integrated Product Teams (IPTs), as needed. Government personnel will participate as members of the IPTs.

C-1.3 PRODUCTION ENGINEERING AND PLANNING.

C-1.3.1 PRODUCTION STATUS REPORTING. The Contractor shall provide production status reports IAW DI-MGMT- CDRL A001) with production line of balance reporting. This report shall include at a minimum an appendix that graphically depicts the production line of balance status to include all major subassemblies produced by the Contractor or procured through a subcontractor. The graph, with supporting narrative, shall address the following elements: (a) cumulative delivery schedule; (b) planned production; (c) current performance; and

(d) program progress to objective. Accompanying narrative shall include the following: (a) explanation of variances from schedule to actual; (b) statement of problems that resulted in variances (c) corrective action taken (d) proposed corrective actions; (e) production recovery date; and (f) impact on hardware delivery schedules.

C-responsible for all production related activities required to successfully develop, plan, and manage the manufacturing technologies and processes required to build and deliver the M2 manufacturing process plans, manufacturing technical data, and production control documentation at the contractor’s site. The Government will be allowed to participate in any production status or readiness reviews conducted at either the Contractor’s facility or a subcontractor’s facility. The Contractor shall provide a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days advance notification via the IPT Working Group Meeting of any planned reviews.

C-1.3.3 PRODUCTION WORKING GROUP (PWG). The Contractor shall conduct PWG meetings with the Government quarterly to cover the status of all ongoing production activities. Attendees shall include planning and production control personnel.

C-provided under this contract and required to resolve production and manufacturing issues includes the following disciplines: systems engineering, design engineering, test engineering, and planning.

C-that the Contractor’s production processes comply with the design, manufacturing, inspection, and test requirements of the launcher system. The P/PVs shall be assessed using “work-in-process” hardware being built on the Contractor’s and/or supplier’s qualified production line. The Government will be allowed to participate and support contractor and subcontractor Validations, First Article Test (FAT) activities, supplier program and supplier technical reviews as required in the execution of this contract.

C- C-1.3.6.1 The Contractor shall implement a predictive parts obsolescence program for the identification, resolution, and implementation of all obsolescence issues associated with . The Contractor shall include obsolescence management as part of the contractor’s ongoing Parts Management Program. The Contractor shall flow the obsolescence requirements defined down to the subcontractors.

C-1.3.6.2 In the event the Contractor is unable to obtain parts, components, subassemblies, or assemblies from its suppliers due to obsolescence or non-availability, then the Contractor shall notify the procuring contracting officer (PCO) in writing as soon as possible of such obsolescence or non-availability.

a. The Contractor shall submit a Indentured Bill of Material (BOM)/Generation Breakdown (CDRL A002) that includes an indentured system breakdown to the piece part level for electronic parts with valid commercial manufacturer any identified alternate components for use as a form, fit, and function drop-in replacement of electronic components identified by the OWG as having a high-risk potential for obsolescence. The Contractor shall provide an initial BOM to the government at contract award. Updates to the BOM shall be provided on a semi- annual basis, highlighting each change to the BOM that occurred since the previous submittal.

b. OWG Support: The Contractor shall participate in an Obsolescence Working Group (OWG). The Contractor shall conduct OWG meetings with the Government every two weeks to cover the status of all ongoing parts obsolescence activities. Attendees shall include engineering, production operations, logistics, and procurement (subcontracts) personnel.

The Contractor shall participate as defined in the following subparagraphs.

1. The Contractor may invite subcontractors to participate, when appropriate.

2. The Contractor shall work all action items as a result of OWG meetings to a Government and Contractor agreed to closure date.

3. The Contractor shall reconcile all obsolescence/DMS risks identified by the OWG to an agreed to closure date.

4. The Contractor shall provide the OWG with relevant cost, inventory, and

The Contractor shall provide the OWG with inventory quantities of obsolete components available for consumption under this contract.

6. The contractor shall coordinate resolution of obsolescence issues through the

OWG.

c. Obsolescence/DMS Notification: The contractor shall notify the PCO within 20 days of discovery of unavailability of materials or parts required for delivery of AGMS hardware due to obsolescence or diminishing manufacturing sources. The notice will include the supplier’s production discontinuation notice (PDN) or additional written confirmation from the supplier. The initial notification may include any Contractor assessment of impact or possible solution, if available. Once the Contractor has a recommended solution, the Contractor shall coordinate with the OWG to finalize the mechanism for obsolescence resolution. The Contractor shall then notify the PCO via updated contracts letter whether additional Government action is required. This notification may incl with obsolescence/DMSMS issue resolution. The contractor will status each notice as to progress toward a recommended solution through the OWG meeting. The Government and the contractor agree to work together to solve the Obsolescence/DMSMS issue which gave rise to the previously mentioned notification. If after all efforts stated in this provision have been exhausted and the contractor notifies the Government in writing that no vendor can be obtained or qualified, and the component part cannot be redesigned due to technical or cost limitations, the PCO will commence with the issuance of a termination for convenience of the Government for that contract line item.

d. Obsolescence Solutions:

1. The contractor shall develop recommended solutions for each

OWG identified problem part, material and/or process. Per SD-22, Obsolescence cases may be closed under the following solution types:

• No solution required

• Approved Part

• Simple Substitute

• Complex Substitute

• Extension of production or support

• Repair/Refurbish/or Reclamation

• Development of a new item or source

• Redesign/Re-spin

2. The Contractor shall track the solution status of each problem part, material and/or process.

3. The Contractor shall identify opportunities for technology refresh of electronic assemblies to reduce long-term obsolescence risk.

e. Obsolescence/DMS Event Summary: The Contractor shall provide the Government an obsolescence summary on a semi-annual basis that includes a cumulative list of all cases tracked in the OWG, including open alerts, watch items and closed items

(CDRL A003).

C-1.4 PRODUCT ASSURANCE

C-systems as agreed to between the Contractor and the Government. The Contractor’s quality system shall provide controls of process and product characteristics and include criteria and methodology that are used to validate conformance to performance specifications and to achieve continuous improvement.

This quality system shall be integrated with all other functional disciplines. The Contractor shall make available for Government review quality system manuals/procedures, planning, and all other documentation and data that comprise the Contractor’s quality system, for hardware, software, and firmware. The Government will perform any necessary in-plant inspections or evaluations to confirm conformance to requirements and the adequacy of the quality system.

C-1.4.2 PRODUCT ACCEPTANCE. The Contractor shall develop, implement, document and maintain a product acceptance system which demonstrates compliance to performance requirements in MIS-

- n and test equipment, software, firmware, calibration procedures, and acceptance test procedures, shall require a current Government validation. The Government will monitor changes to the product acceptance system through the Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) process and through contact with the Contractor. The Government and the Contractor shall mutually determine the need to revalidate the product acceptance system based on the number and scope of changes. Any technical issues regarding the product acceptance system that are not resolved between the Contractor and the Government shall be resolved between senior Contractor and Tactical Aviation and Ground Munitions (TAGM) Project Office management. The Contractor shall notify the Government a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days in advance of all validation efforts to enable Government attendance.

C- Government validation prior to use and following the changes in paragraph C-1.4.2.4.

C-1.4.2.2 TEST PROCEDURES. The supplier shall provide acceptance test procedures for all tests required for acceptance IAW DI-NDTI- CDRL A004). Each item or part thereof that requires acceptance testing shall be covered by an acceptance test procedure.

C-1.4.2.3 SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE. When acceptance tests use equipment controlled by computer software or firmware, the software or firmware associated with, or affecting those acceptance tests, will be approved by the Government via IPT Working Group agreement.

changes to the product acceptance system to the Government. Changes shall void the existing validation and shall require Government concurrence or re-validation. Changes include modifications to test equipment, software, firmware, calibration procedures, test procedures, and physical relocation within and among facilities. The Contractor shall notify the Government no later than fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the start of validation via IPT Working Group Meeting. The Government will be allowed to participate on site at all validations. The Contractor shall provide validation plans IAW DI-MISC-

CDRL A005). The Contractor shall provide validation reports IAW DI-SESS- CDRL A006).

C-acceptance inspections and tests. The listing shall include: (1) equipment description configuration (brand, model, serial number, etc.); (2) the corresponding product characteristic(s) the equipment measures or tests; (3) a crosswalk between MIS- , MIS- and each piece of inspection and test equipment; (4) master software version description, to encompass each active acceptance test set, and be provided IAW DI-IPSC- CDRL A007), to record the exact, current version(s) of validated software for each acceptance test set.

C-and test equipment is capable of the required accuracy and precision for determining conformance to design, performance, and process characteristics during its use. All inspection and test equipment, whether standard or non-standard, shall be calibrated with accuracies traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology or equivalent international standards.

C-1.4.2.7 POINT OF CONTACT. The Contractor shall designate a specific point of contact responsible for all aspects of, and communication regarding, the product acceptance system for the duration of this contract.

C- (GFTE). The Contractor shall be responsible for hardware maintenance (including calibration) of government-owned test equipment located at the Contractor’s facility. The Contractor shall perform normal “wear and tear” maintenance of government owned property as required. Maintenance includes labor and materials required to keep the GFTE operational to support launcher production. Any software maintenance or hardware/software upgrades to the equipment shall be handled via a separately funded Engineering Services task. The Contractor shall notify the Government of any issues encountered with the TE that might affect launcher performance, reliability, form-fit-function, or any other adverse conditions.

C-1.4.3 PROCESSES AND FABRICATION. Fabrication and soldering of electrical and electronic assembles shall be IAW IPC J-STD-001, Class 3. Cable and wire harness assemblies shall be IAW

-A-620, Class 3. The use of a Government Approved Single Process Initiative for Electronic Fabrication is acceptable.

C- The FAT requirements are specified in the applicable allocated and product baselines. The Government and the Contractor shall determine when a change necessitates a new FAT, up to and including system level. Should the Government and the Contractor not agree on what change necessitates a new FAT, the Contractor shall request a waiver for the FAT.

The sample size for launcher and subassembly first article test is six (6) units each, or a number defined by agreement between the Contractor and the Government. The Government further reserves the right to require a new FAT in the event that any of the following occur: (a) the production line is down for more than 12 months; (b) the production line for critical assemblies is relocated or moved to new facilities; (c) a new Critical Source builds an existing design which has already passed design qualification. All costs of any FAT resulting from any change elected by the Contractor or subcontractors or resulting from a break in production of twelve (12) months or more due to early delivery by the Contractor or subcontractors that was not specifically required by the Government shall be borne by the Contractor at no increase in contract price (no charge to the government) or other cost to the Government. Costs associated with all such FAT, whether at the level of a component or the level of a contract deliverable end item, are recognized as normal costs of ongoing production. If the Government directs an engineering change, causes a break in the production line that warrants a FAT, or the Government closes a Government Owned/Contractor Operated (GOCO) facility that results in a production line re-location, or shutdown greater than 12 months, the Government will be responsible for the cost of FAT. The Contractor shall notify the Government PCO, in writing, of the start date and location, not later than 14 days in advance of the start of the FAT. If a new FAT is required, the Contractor shall prepare the test plan and test report IAW DI-NDTI- (CDRL A008) and DI- NDTI- (CDRL A009), respectively.

C- PARTS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP). The Contractor and its subcontractors shall utilize a PMP IAW Document (Attachment 0010) as guidance. The PMP: (a) shall govern the selection and control for all classes of components, including commercial off-the-shelf and non-standard parts; (b) shall include parts obsolescence management; (c) shall include counterfeit prevention program and (d) shall ensure that all parts meet the reliability, environmental, and electrical/mechanical performance requirements of the applicable PBSs and PNs. They shall coordinate all exceptions to the PMP with the Government via the Parts Management Program Working Group (PMPWG). Any technical issue differences between the Contractor and the Government related to PMP shall be resolved between senior Contractor personnel (program manager or equivalent) and the TAGM Project Office Management.

C- Contractor shall minimize the recurrence of failure by using a closed loop FRACAS. A FRACAS shall also apply to major subcontracts. “Major subcontracts” is defined as “the subcontractors for all configuration items.” A “configuration item” is defined as “any hardware or software item or combination of both, typically referred to by an alphanumeric identifier that satisfies an end use function and is designated for separate configuration management.” The Government will monitor the FRACAS through its participation in the Contractor’s program Corrective Action Board (CAB) reviews. The FRACAS shall consist of the following: detailed information concerning the failed item, to include nomenclature and part number; dates of failure(s) failure symptoms and mode; details of type of, where, when, and how failure occurred; failure analysis, methods and results; corrective action on individual equipment and measures to prevent other failures; and disposition of failed item.

C-1.4.6.1 CORRECTIVE ACTION BOARD (CAB). As a part of the "closed-loop" FRACAS, the Contractor shall lead a monthly CAB with allowable Government participation to address all problems encountered during production from supplier base. Unverified failures, qualification test failures, flight shall be documented and addressed for root cause and approved by a Failure Review Board (FRB) with Government participation. A fault tree methodology analysis shall be used when directed by the FRB. In addition, corrective action(s) shall be recommended for joint Government/Contractor senior management approval. A Failure Summary and Analysis Report shall be submitted IAW DI-SESS- (CDRL A010).

C- The Contractor shall identify and eliminate latent defects from hardware without causing it damage or reducing its useful life.

The Government reserves the right to monitor and provide input for the ESS program development, implementation, evaluation, and optimization including any critical program change. The Contractor DI-ENVR-the test requirement documents (i.e., those documents contained in the AGM Product Baseline

Contractor shall not implement any launcher or launcher subassembly ESS program changes without prior Government approval.

Any technical issues between the Contractor and the Government related to ESS shall be resolved between senior Contractor (program manager or equivalent) and the TAGM Project Office management. Technical reviews of ESS program at the Contractor quarterly. Technical review can be conducted concurrently with AGMS missile ESS technical review.

C-associated specifications, and any other contractual agreements are flowed down to their lower tier subcontractors/suppliers and that compliance is verified. In addition to the requirements of

ANSI/ISO/

of any proposed changes in design, materials, fabrication methods, tooling, facilities, or processes previously approved by the Contractor and obtain written approval of the changes from the Contractor.

C- - The Contractor shall use a documented system for evaluation and disposition of non-conforming material. This system shall be used for tracking, analyzing to determine root cause, and assuring effective preventative/corrective action implementation. The Contractor shall ensure that all products meet specified contractual requirements. Installation or use of non-conforming products without specific Government authorization is not permitted. Non-conformances shall not be given a disposition of “use as is” or “repair” through Contractor action without Government approval. Root Cause and Corrective Action will be documented before any disposition to “use-as-is” is considered. Rework to engineering is acceptable using Government approved Standard Repair Procedures (SRP). The Contractor shall maintain a procedure to control the identification, documentation, evaluation, disposition, and segregation requirements of non-conforming products. The Government shall be notified of any non-conforming products via the Material Review Board (MRB) or Request for Variance (RFV) process. The Contractor shall notify the PCO immediately of any discovered non-conformances that may exist in previously delivered products. Notification shall include a description of the suspected nonconformance, potential risk or product impact, contract number, Part Number, National Stock Number (NSN), affected serial numbers, or lot numbers, when applicable.

C- (MRB). The determination authority to accept or reject minor nonconformance, MRB Authority, is delegated to Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) in accordance with FAR 46.407, subject to the following: Engineering analysis and documentation will be performed by the Contractor to demonstrate that the item is safe to use and will perform in a manner that enables the end-item to meet its performance requirements. Root Cause and Corrective Action will be documented before any disposition to “Use-As-Is” is considered. MRB will not be used as a substitute for the corrective action to prevent the manufacture and presentation to the Government of non-conforming supplies. There will not be repeated tendering of non-conforming supplies. Defects classified as critical (safety related defects) or major (defects which affect form, fit, function or flow down requirements from the system level specification) require Government approval prior to use.

Existing TAGM Project Office approved Standard Repair Procedures (SRP) shall be used for any repairs of major defects. For a repair not covered by a SRP, the Contractor may propose a procedure for Government approval.

All Q-Notes with MRB disposition and Standard Repair items as well as all non-conforming material data are made available to DCMA via the Contractor’s MRB processing system as they are dispositioned. DCMA personnel shall have access to the Contractor’s internal procedures and systems for non-conforming material control. DCMA will be responsible for review and validation that the Contractor has performed technical assessment, identified root cause and corrective action IAW policies, procedures, and the Quality Assurance Program (QAP). A summary of the closed Q-notes with MRB disposition shall be submitted on a bi-weekly (twice per month) basis in electronic format via a secure transmittal method with notification to a specified email distribution list for DCMA approval. If a Q- Note references any additional information, this information will be made available to the Government.

If approval with or without comments cannot be provided by DCMA to the Contractor within two business days, the issue will be elevated to TAGM for evaluation and recommendation to the PCO/ACO. The Contractor is responsible for maintaining a record of DCMA approval and providing it upon request. In addition, all DCMA approved MRBs will be presented during the monthly Corrective Action Board (CAB) meetings.

C- PROGRAM. For any newly developed hardware, the Contractor shall implement a CPC program using the guidance in the DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control Planning Guidebook. The CPC program shall include the following elements:

Establishment of a management structure for hardware being designed, procured, and maintained to address CPC issues throughout the acquisition life cycle of the system, including a Contractor Corrosion Team (or equivalent)

A Corrosion Prevention and Deterioration Control Plan A Process/Finish Specification Verification and Testing Methods

All existing, qualified hardware shall not be subject to the provisions of the CPCP.

C-1.4.10.1 Corrosion Prevention and Deterioration Control (CPDC) Plan. The Contractor shall prepare a CPDC Plan consistent with the DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control Planning Guidebook and submit IAW DI-MFFP- CDRL A011). The program CPDC Plan shall define corrosion prevention control requirements and considerations for system definition, design, engineering development, production, and sustainment phases, consistent with the design life of the system.

C-1.4.10.2 Process/Finish Specification. The Contractor shall prepare a process/finish specification

-STD-

specific organic and inorganic surface pretreatments and coatings, and other corrosion prevention and control materials and processes intended to be used for protection against corrosion of the materials selected, as previously identified in the CPDC Plan. The Contractor shall submit the specification report IAW DI-MFFP- CDRL A012). The Contractor shall use the established requirements to develop production drawings and maintenance documents.

C-1.4.10.3 Verification and Testing Methods. The Contractor shall define corrosion criteria in testing.

The Contractor shall ensure that the test plans include and define the types and level of corrosion testing, and the Contractor shall provide rationale for verification of the corrosion design.

C- Contractor shall provide warranty status report documenting the applicable data for the warranted items delivered under this contract IAW DI-MGMT-

CDRL A013).

C-1.4.12 ASSESSMENT (SAS). The Contractor shall conduct SAS reviews of the All-Up- Contractor’s production

Contractor shall conduct annual SAS reviews at its Ocala, facility, Archbald, PA facility, and Marvin Engineering’s (or mutually agreed upon major suppliers), production facilities during each fiscal year’s production buy, if an option is exercised. Concurrent with these annual reviews at the Contractor’s acility and Marvin Engineering. The Contractor shall also conduct a minimum of one (1) additional SAS review at major/critical suppliers. The Government and the Contractor shall mutually agree upon the major/critical suppliers at which the SAS review will be conducted. The Contractor shall perform the SAS using “work-in-process” hardware being built on the Contractor’s and/or supplier’s qualified production line. The Contractor shall retain SAS documentation as baseline documentation, to include actual inspection data.

C- . If the Government makes any change that affects the performance interchangeability/interoperability of the missile with the SIE, then the Government is responsible for the validation effort. For any Government validation activity, the Contractor currently being built on the production line). If the Government subsequently determines that the Contractor’s technical support is required to support its validation activity, the Government will issue a tasking direction under an Engineering Services Contract for the Contractor to perform specific activities related to its SIE validation.

The Contractor shall verify the SIE is ready for validation and notify the TAGM Product Office a

The Contractor shall prepare an SIE validation plan IAW DI-MISC- and make it available in calendar days prior to scheduled validation (CDRL A014). The base design upgrade will be validated and the implementation of the same upgrade on multiple test sets will each get an Acceptance Test Procedure.

Upon completion of the validation, the Contractor shall maintain control of SIE through the configuration control process. The Contractor shall maintain control of calibration, and revalidation if the location of SIE changes. The requirement to revalidate will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the TAGM Product Office.

C.1.4.13.1 MAINTENANCE OF GOVERNMENT- The Contractor shall be responsible for hardware maintenance, including calibration, of government-owned SIE, utilizing GFE spares, located at the Contractor’s Ocala, Fl facility to the line replaceable unit level using government- furnished guidance section. The Government will provide technical support for troubleshooting SIE maintenance issues upon request by the Contractor. The Contractor shall inform the Government of any issues encountered that might warrant the replacement of existing guidance section or a requirement for additional guidance section(s).

This excludes any software maintenance or hardware/software upgrades to the current SIE.

C-1.5 CONFIGURATION & DATA MANAGEMENT (CDM)

C- ADMINISTRATION. The Contractor shall implement a CDM System that shall control the Contractor's CDM system shall address the following elements: Administration; Configuration Identification and Control; Configuration Change Management; Configuration Status Accounting; and Configuration Audits. The Contractor shall designate a single Point of Contact who shall be the technical authority and have the program responsibility for all CDM functions.

C- The configuration identification follows:

Configuration Item (CI) Performance Specification

MIS-

MIS-

C- 1.1 Contractor shall provide an ECP IAW DI-SESS- (CDRL A015) and applicable Notices of Revisions (NOR) IAW DI-SESS- (CDRL A016). The Contractor shall identify temporary changes in hardware IAW DI-

SESS- (CDRL A017).

incorporated into the contract by formal contract modification prior to Contractor implementation.

C- 2

C- 2 Contractor shall prepare and deliver an ECP IAW DI-SESS- (CDRL A015) and NORs IAW DI-SESS- CDRL A016). The Contractor shall prepare and deliver RFVs to document temporary changes in hardware IAW DI-SESS- CDRL A017).

C- 2.2 Contractor shall prepare and deliver performance specifications with proposed modifications IAW DI-SDMP- CDRL A018 -STD-provide the official performance specification via contract modification to the Contractor after Government approval of the applicable ECP.

C- 2.3 Contractor shall prepare, maintain, and deliver product drawings/models and associated lists IAW DI-SESS- CDRL A019 -STD-31000 (Contract Attachment 0006), the Technical Data Package (TDP) Selection Worksheet– The Contractor shall address Item Unique Identification (IUID) requirements in drawings IAW

- -STD-130.

C- .4 Contractor shall identify and provide a list of all technical publications that require update/revision due to the ECP. The accompany the ECP submittal.

C- 3 maintain the hardware, software, firmware and all data necessary to support the production build The

C- 3.1 Contractor -SESS- (CDRL A015) and Applicable NORs IAW DI-SESS- (CDRL A016). The Contractor shall identify

-SESS- (CDRL

A017).

C- 3.2 Contractor shall prepare and deliver performance specifications with proposed modifications IAW DI-SDMP- CDRL A018 -STD-provide the official performance specification via contract modification to the Contractor after Government approval of the applicable ECP.

C- 3.3 Contractor shall allow Government participation in their Configuration Control Board (CCB) as a non-voting member.

C- 3.4 Media for delivery of engineering data, drawings, associated lists, and specifications that define the hardware shall be IAW MIS-STD- -IS. All documentation containing classified

-M. The Contractor shall deliver all classified data on CD ROM or via a method approved by the TAGM Security Officer.

C- CONFIGURATION STATUS ACCOUNTING (CSA)

C- Contractor shall maintain a CSA system IAW the Contractor’s internal CDM policy and procedures to assure an accurate identification of each delivered unit of hardware.

C- components shall be IAW the Contractor’s existing serialization plan. The Government will provide assigned serial numbers for all-up-round

Contractor upon request.

C- Contractor shall provide CSA information IAW DI-SESS- (CDRL A020) for the as-built record. As each unit is manufactured and delivered to the Government, the Contractor shall establish a record detailing the exact configuration. The Contractor documentation is an accurate reflection of the hardware build, and the Contractor shall include this certification on the transmittal document for this data.

C- Contractor shall correlate as-built data to the as-designed engineering data and manufacturing/quality records. The as-built data shall subordinate parts, associated serial or lot numbers, and, where applicable, engineering changes incorporated; (2) the variance from as-designed configuration.

C- CONFIGURATION AUDITS. The Government may attend any Contractor configuration audits or inspections. The Government must be notified 30 days prior to any configuration audits or inspections taking place. The Government may at any time during this

C- MANAGEMENT.

The Contractor shall implement an electronic data management program which utilizes a web-based password protected SharePoint Collaborative Data Environment (CDE) (or an approved alternative by the Government) approach and provides: (a) uniform planning and status reporting of all program contract data; (b) visibility of actual data requirements; and (c) current and timely submittal of all contractually required data. The Contractor shall provide a data management report IAW DI-MGMT-

CDRL A021). In lieu of a CDE, the Contractor shall use the US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (CCDC), Aviation and Missile Center Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE) site (https://safe.apps.mil)

C- Contractor shall provide electronic access to, and delivery IAW Exhibit A of, unclassified data in digital form using the Contractor’s SharePoint. Delivery shall be accomplished by placing the electronic data onto the SharePoint and notifying the intended recipients via e-mail notification. The Contractor -

Contractor shall deliver classified data on CD ROM, SDREN, or a method approved by the Government. The Contractor shall make provisions for the delivery of large data sets by CD ROM or DVD when online access is ineffective. If the Contractor is utilizing the CDE, the Contractor shall maintain all active CDE data in an electronic form and make it available to all authorized Government users, reviewers, and their authorized representatives. All performance specifications, indentured parts lists, and as-built records shall be provided in text searchable format.

C- Contractor shall deliver large data sets that may not be efficiently downloaded from SharePoint by data disks or if mutually agreeable, by Department of Defense Secure Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE).

C- Contractor shall provide data in text searchable format. The following formats are acceptable for data to be digitally delivered under this contract: Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word (docx*), Microsoft Excel (xlsx*), or other Microsoft Office Suite formats. Naming conventions for contract deliverable data files shall be established to support traceability of data by system users.

C- Contractor shall continue to maintain this data, in electronic format, throughout the contract period of performance.

C-with the requirements of the software product that generated the data. Metadata shall define, as a minimum, the document number, title, and revision level. The following formats are acceptable for data to be digitally delivered under this contract: Adobe (PDF), Microsoft Word (DOCX*), Microsoft

SX*), or other Microsoft Office Suite formats. Unless specifically stated herein, these requirements do not replace or amend requirements for delivery of technical data in digital or non-digital formats specified elsewhere in the contract. Specific data delivery format and other information will be specified on the applicable contract data requirements list.

C-1.6 TEST AND EVALUATION.

C- - Contractor proposes to deliver launchers which are of a different configuration (changes that result in a part number change to any of the ), than those which have successfully passed qualification testing at system level, the Contractor shall be responsible for re-qualification testing per MIS- Contractor shall not present launchers for delivery until re-qualification is successfully completed.

C-1.6.2 The Government reserves the right to conduct periodic tests as needed to verify hardware delivered under this contract complies with MIS- Government reserves the right to suspend hardware acceptance until the Contractor implements appropriate corrective action.

C-1.7 LOGISTICS.

C-1.7.1 PRESERVATION AND PACKAGING.

C-1.7.1.1 DESIGN. The Contractor then preserved to provide physical protection, water protection, water-vapor protection, and applicable requirements of MIS-

C-1.7.2 TRANSPORTATION. Items shipped to the Government shall be Free-On-Board (FOB) origin.

C-1.7.3 ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (IUID) The Contractor shall provide DoD IUID, or a DoD- - -STD-130 as a guide.

The Contractor 7003 and the data submission procedures located at http://www.acq.osd.mil.dpap.UID.DataSubmission.html.

C-1.7.4 UNIQUE IDENTIFIER (UID). The Contractor shall provide UID marking of items IAW DFARS- - -STD-130. A listing of items for which UID is required is provided is as follows:

NOMENCLATURE NSN PART NUMBER

1440-01- -6361

1440-01- - Circuit Card Assy, Power Supply -01- - Circuit Card Assy, Processor -01- -1141

-01- -1142 Transformer/Rectifier Assy -01- -

-01- -01- -7402

Rail Assy - 1440-01-624- *NOTE: Containers shall reflect identical readable data media as reflected on the above items

The equivalent items shall be marked for other services, other agencies, and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) configurations.

C- DI-

PACK- the latest SPI per Contract (Attachment 0005).

C-1.8 SAFETY.

C-this contract, the Contractor shall take the necessary immediate precautions to protect personnel and property. The Contractor shall then notify the Government PCO, Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), and the Government Project Manager (SFAE- -TA) immediately by telephone with follow-up memorandum of such conditions. The memorandum shall outline the Contractor’s plan for surveillance, management, and resolution of the conditions inherent in the unsafe situation, specifically, the detailed corrective action taken/planned.

C-test, or operation of the systems are not permitted without prior written authorization from the applied. Radioactive materials shall be defined as those with a specific radioactivity of 0.002 microcuries or greater.

C- radioactive, or carcinogenic materials as defined above, shall be made available for survey by Government safety personnel on request.

C-1.8.4 Hazardous Materials Management

C- Contractor and subcontractor activities shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. The Contractor shall ensure that design, maintenance, operation, manufacturing, programmatic decisions, and trade-off studies strive to eliminate or reduce hazardous materials and wastes. The Contractor National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 411. The Contractor update IAW DI-MISC- (CDRL A022).

materials; beryllium; coatings SPEC); functional fluids (e.g. coolant, hydraulic fluid, petroleum products); energetics/solid rocket motor components (including Explosives Class Number);

advanced composite materials (e.g. fabricated from silica, graphite, carbon, boron, fiberglass); batteries;

Class I/Class II ODS/ODC materials; and asbestos. (2) A general description (to include a graphic or drawing) of where these materials are located within the end item. (3) Required maintenance/repair/support materials to include

Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) 302/313 materials utilized in the manufacturing process. The Contractor shall include all material safety data sheets for all hazardous materials contained within the

C- The Contractor shall request Government approval to use any of the substances identified in the EPA 17 - list available at https://www.epa.gov/epcra/consolidated-list-lists .

C- Contractor shall not use any Class I Ozone Depleting Chemical/Ozone Depleting Substance (ODC/ODS) ( identified at https:// www.epa.gov/ozone-layer-protection/ozone-depleting-substances ) or any ODC/ODS solvents identified as “ODS being replaced” in the manufacture or support of items required by this SOW unless a waiver is obtained from the Army Acquisition Executive. Any ODC/ODS refrigerant alternatives used must appear in the EPA’s Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) list identified at https://www.epa.gov/snap and must have received a toxicity clearance from the

C- 4 The Contractor shall immediately notify the PCO and the TAGM Project Office in writing of any proposed hazardous material mitigation/elimination efforts that may adversely impact schedules and/or cost or performance.

C-1.9 SYSTEM ENGINEERING. The Contractor shall apply the System Engineering Process in the Contractor shall implement a comprehensive, iterative, and recursive problem-solving process during all aspects of the production process.

C-2.0 SPARES.

C-2.1 MANUFACTURE. The Contractor shall manufacture the initial and replenishment spares, identified in Section B, to the configuration identified by the performance specification at each appropriate contract line-item Contractor shall plan, budget, schedule, and control resources allocated for this effort.

C-2.2 PRODUCTION ENGINEERING AND PLANNING.

C-2.2.1 PRODUCTION STATUS REPORTING. The Contractor shall provide production status reports IAW DI-MGMT- CDRL A001) with production line of balance reporting. This report shall include at a minimum the production line of status shall be supplemented via facility visit or weekly telephone conference as requested by the Government.

C-2.2.2 right to review all Contractor manufacturing process plans, manufacturing technical data, and production control documentation. The Government reserves the right to participate in any production status or readiness reviews conducted at either the Contractor’s facility or a subcontractor’s facility. The Contractor shall provide a minimum thirty (30) calendar days advance notification to the Government of any planned reviews.

C-2.3 PRODUCT ASSURANCE/QUALITY.

C-2.3.1 QUALITY SYSTEM. The Contractor shall implement and maintain an effective and systems as agreed to between the Contractor and the Government. The Contractor’s quality system shall provide controls of process and product characteristics and include criteria and methodology that are used to validate conformance to performance specifications and to achieve continuous improvement.

This quality system shall be integrated with all other functional disciplines. The Contractor shall provide quality system data for Government review (to include all quality system manuals/procedures, planning, and all other documentation and data that comprise the Contractor’s quality system, for hardware, software, and firmware). The Government will perform any necessary in-plant inspections or evaluations to confirm conformance to requirements and the adequacy of the quality system. In addition, the Contractor shall implement other contract quality requirements within this SOW.

C-2.3.2 QUALITY SYSTEM ACCESS. The Contractor shall provide the Government with access while on Contractor’s site to all quality system plans, procedures, and all documentation and data generated in the performance of this contract.

C-2.3.3 PRODUCT ACCEPTANCE. The Contractor shall develop, implement, document, and maintain a product acceptance system which demonstrates compliance to performance requirements in

MIS- -

software, firmware, calibration procedures, and acceptance test procedures, shall require a current Government validation. The Government will monitor changes to the product acceptance system through the ECP process and through contact with the Contractor. The Government and the Contractor shall mutually determine the need to revalidate the product acceptance system based on the number and scope of changes. Any technical issues regarding the product acceptance system that are not resolved between the Contractor and the Government shall be resolved between senior Contractor and TAGM Project Office management. The Contractor shall notify the Government a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days in advance of all validation efforts to enable Government attendance.

C-2.3.4 FIRST ARTICLE TEST (FAT). The FAT requirements are specified in the applicable allocated and product baselines. The Government and the Contractor shall determine when a change necessitates a new FAT, up to and including system level. Should the Government and the Contractor not agree on what change necessitates a new FAT, the Contractor shall request a waiver for the FAT.

The sample size for launcher and subassembly first article test is six (6) units each, or a number defined by agreement between the Contractor and the Government. The Government further reserves the right to require a new FAT in the event that any of the following occur: (a) the production line is down for more than twelve (12) months; (b) the production line for critical assemblies is relocated or moved to new facilities; (c) a new Critical Source builds an existing design which has already passed design qualification. All costs of any FAT resulting from any change elected by the Contractor or subcontractors or resulting from a break in production of twelve (12) months or more due to early delivery by the Contractor or subcontractors that was not specifically required by the Government shall be borne by the Contractor at no increase in contract price (no charge to the government) or other cost to the Government. Costs associated with all such FAT, whether at the level of a component or the level of a contract deliverable end item, are recognized as normal costs of ongoing production.