Attach1_Contractors_Performance_Evaluation_Sheet.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- J028 - Caterpillar Engines Yearly Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6264922Q0082
About this file
This document contains a contractor performance evaluation sheet template and information on a related federal contract opportunity for caterpillar engine yearly maintenance services. The evaluation sheet template lists areas to be rated including quality of service, regulation compliance, and invoices. Descriptions are provided for exceptional, very good, acceptable, marginal, and unsatisfactory ratings. The related federal solicitation is for caterpillar boat engine yearly maintenance services under solicitation number N6264922Q0082 issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attach3_Past_Performance_Info.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach2_Financial_Info_Data_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Combined_Syn-Sol_N6264922Q0082.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SHEET
1. NAME OF CONTRACTOR:
2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. PERFORMANCE PERIOD OR DATE OF OPERATION:
AREAS TO BE EVALUATED
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Quality of Service
Regulation Compliance
Invoices
COMMENTS:
Name and Title of Evaluator:
Phone No.:
Signature:
Date:
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS:
(a) Exceptional (E): The services performed by the Contractor are considered to have exceeded the performance standards described in “Performance Based Service Contract (PBSC)” and demonstrates a high probability of success without any problems during the remaining period of the contract.
(b) Very Good (VG): The services performed by the Contractor are considered to have satisfied the performance standards and demonstrates a good probability of success during the remaining period of the contract. Even if the Contractor had minor problems on its performance, the Contractor has demonstrated that it could correct such problems without any damage to the Government.
(c) Satisfactory (S): The Contractor’s performance is considered to have substantially met the stated performance standards and demonstrates a good probability of success during the remaining period of the contract. Even if the Contractor had minor problems on its performance, the Contractor has demonstrated that it could correct such problems with minimal damage to the Government. Although some minor inconsistency or weakness exists, it can be readily corrected.
(d) Marginal (M): The Contractor’s performance is considered to have partially failed meeting the stated performance standards, and the response to correct the deficiency was marginal. That is, a substantial number of the Contractor’s performance records responses “good,” but a deficiency or weakness exists, and it/they may be susceptible or correction through the exchange of information. There is marginal probability of success during the remaining period of the contract.
(e) Unsatisfactory (U): The Contractor failed meeting one or more of the stated performance standards, and the failure was considered “major.” Even if the failure was minor, the Contractor did not or could not correct the deficiency properly and/or it adversely affected the Government operation. In such a case, probability to success during the remaining period of the contract is minimal unless a proper corrective action is made.
N6264922Q0082 Attachment (1)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .