Attach. 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire PPQ.pdf

PDF 703 KB Posted

Attached to
DPM Schedule I, II & III Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA462024QA200
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for a Department of the Air Force solicitation for Deployed Prime Mission Need (DPM) Schedule I, II, and III services at Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington. The contractor is seeking feedback on its past performance of similar services from respondents for use in evaluating proposals. Respondents are asked to provide information on their organization and complete the questionnaire by rating the contractor's performance on a scale of 1 to 5 in areas such as personnel adequacy, employee knowledge and experience, performance of duties, deficiency correction, and overall performance. The completed questionnaires must be returned to the Contract Specialist by December 4, 2023.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DPM Schedule I, II & III, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amend 0004.pdf PDF
Amend 0003.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Amend 0001.pdf PDF
Attach. 1 PWS.pdf PDF
Attach. 2 - Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach. 4 - OPSEC Pamphlet.pdf PDF
24QA200 - Combo - DPM Schedule I. II, & III.pdf PDF
Attach. 3 - WD 15-5537 (Rev 20).pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FAIRCHILD DPM Schedule I, II & III

FAIRCHILD AFB, WA

SOLICITATION NO: FA462024QA200

1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the below present/past performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated since this survey will measure the present/past performance of each prospective offeror for providing DPM Schedule I, II & III at Fairchild AFB, WA.

2. INSTRUCTIONS FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand or electronically and email the results to the Contract Specialist(s), Paul Blais, at paul.blais@us.af.mil and Michelle Domfort at michelle.domfort.1@us.af.mil. Email submissions are preferred but you can also return by mail to the following address:

92 CONS/PKA

Attn: Ms. Michelle Domfort or Mr. Paul Blais 110 W. Ent St Fairchild AFB WA 99011

3. Please direct questions to Paul Blais (509) 247-4864. Your participation is greatly appreciated.

4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 4 December 2023, at 1:00 PM (Pacific Time)

Section A: Contractor Information.

Contractor’s name and address:

a. Point of Contact:

b. Phone #:

c. Contract Number:

d. Project Title:

e. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

a. Respondent’s name and address: Organization: _

Address:

City: _ State: _ Zip: _

b. Respondent’s Name and Title:

c. Signature:

d. Commercial Phone #: DSN Phone #:

Fax #: E-Mail:

e. Contract Type (i.e.: Firm Fixed Price):

f. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $

g. What was the job title(s) for this project?

FA462024QA200

Attach. 5 - PPQ mailto:paul.blais@us.af.mil mailto:michelle.domfort.1@us.af.mil

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract?

If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please call Paul Blais @ 509-247-4864.

For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.

1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Good Exceptional

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

CONTRACTOR PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. How effective was the contractor at having adequate personnel to meet the requirement of the Performance Work Statement?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. Were the contract employees knowledgeable and experienced in their position?

3 How well did contract personnel perform assigned duties?

FA462024QA200

Attach. 5 - PPQ

4. How well did the contractor correct deficiencies and valid customer complaints in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures?

5. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

6. Were Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR) issued, Yes/No ____ Were they addressed appropriately? Yes/No ______ If so, how?

7. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

Yes/No ___

8. Would you award another contract to this contractor? Yes/No ____ Please explain in "comments/remarks”.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

FA462024QA200

Attach. 5 - PPQ

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .