Attach. 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire PPQ.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
CES Manlift Maintenance
Solicitation number
FA462024QA235
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) related to a federal contract opportunity for CES Manlift Maintenance at Fairchild AFB, WA under Solicitation No. FA462024QA235.

The PPQ requests information from a respondent regarding the contractor's past performance in areas such as having adequate personnel, employee knowledge and experience, timely correction of deficiencies, and overall performance. The questionnaire includes a rating scale and asks the respondent to provide comments for any ratings less than satisfactory. Additional questions address whether Contract Discrepancy Reports were issued, if the contractor was issued a cure or show cause notice, and if the respondent would award another contract to this contractor. The completed PPQ is requested to be returned by August 21, 2024 at 1:00 PM Pacific Time.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amend 0002 SF30.pdf PDF
Amend 0001 SF30.pdf PDF
24QA235 Manlift Combo.pdf PDF
Attach. 1 - Manlift SOW.pdf PDF
Attach. 2 - Pricing list and workload data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach. 3 - WD 15-5537 (Rev 23).pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CES Manlift Maintenance

FAIRCHILD AFB, WA

SOLICITATION NO: FA462024QA235

1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the below present/past performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated since this survey will measure the present/past performance of each prospective offerer for providing CES Manlift Maintenance at Fairchild AFB, WA.

2. INSTRUCTIONS FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand or electronically and email the results to the Contract Specialist(s), SrA Brandon Terry at brandon.terry.9@us.af.mil Email submissions are preferred but you can also return by mail to the following address:

92 CONS/PKA

Attn: SrA Brandon Terry 110 W. Ent St Fairchild AFB WA 99011

3. Please direct questions to SrA Brandon Terry (509) 247-4868. Your participation is greatly appreciated.

4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 21 August 2024, at 1:00 PM (Pacific Time)

Section A: Contractor Information.

Contractor’s name and address:

a. Point of Contact:

b. Phone #:

c. Contract Number:

d. Project Title:

e. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

a. Respondent’s name and address: Organization: _

Address:

City: _ State: _ Zip: _

b. Respondent’s Name and Title:

c. Signature:

d. Commercial Phone #: DSN Phone #:

Fax #: E-Mail:

e. Contract Type (i.e.: Firm Fixed Price):

f. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $

g. What was the job title(s) for this project?

FA462024QA235

Attach. 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire mailto:paul.blais@us.af.mil

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract?

If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please call Paul Blais @ 509-247-4864.

For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.

1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Good Exceptional

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

CONTRACTOR PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. How effective was the contractor at having adequate personnel to meet the requirement of the Performance Work Statement?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. Were the contract employees knowledgeable and experienced in their position?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

3 How well did contract personnel perform assigned duties?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

FA462024QA235

Attach. 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

4. How well did the contractor correct deficiencies and valid customer complaints in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

5. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

6. Were Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR) issued, Yes/No ____ Were they addressed appropriately? Yes/No ______ If so, how?

7. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

Yes/No ___

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

8. Would you award another contract to this contractor? Yes/No ____ Please explain in "comments/remarks”.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

FA462024QA235

Attach. 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .